| Date |
Text |
| 2003-06-26 00:00:00 | SECOND PAID PLAN REVIEW, NOT A PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO BOTH |
| | BUILDING TYPES. |
| | |
| | THE TRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE |
| | SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED WHEN SUBMITTED |
| | FOR PERMIT APPLICATION.THE STATEMENT |
| | CONTAINED IN FBC 105.13.4.4 MUST APPEAR |
| | ON THE PERMIT PLANS. |
| | |
| | ADVISORY NOTE:THE U904 THREE HOUR FIRE |
| | RATED MASONRY WALL SYSTEM REQUIRES |
| | BLOCKS WITH UL CLASSIFICATION.THERE |
| | ARE FEW IF ANY MANUFACTURERS IN THIS |
| | AREA THAT PROVIDE UL CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | SHEET S3.01 GENERAL NOTE #3 DECLARES |
| | COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES OF |
| | +37.1 AND -48.4.THE "ROOF FASTENING |
| | ZONE" SHOWS 4' AND 5' FOR ZONE 3. |
| | SHEET 3.02 DECLARES A "BASIC PRESSURE" |
| | FROM TABLE 1606.2A AS P=38.5 PSF.THE |
| | TABLE WITH THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS IN WALLS CALLS |
| | OUT AN INTERIOR ZONE AND EDGE STRIP. |
| | THIS TABLE HAS A COEFFICIENT OF 1.10 |
| | AND LIST OF VALUES.THE ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER DATED 5/28/03 STATED |
| | THAT THE SIMPLIFIED WINDLOAD METHOD IN |
| | FBC 1606.2 WAS TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | WHERE ARE THE PRESSURES IN GENERAL NOTE |
| | # 3 TO BE APPLIED?HOW WERE THEY |
| | DETERMINED? |
| | |
| | TABLE 1606.2A IS THE TABLE FOR THE MAIN |
| | WIND FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM, NOT |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING.FBC 1606.2 |
| | DOES NOT USE A "BASIC PRESSURE" SUCH AS |
| | THAT DECLARED AS "P= 38 PSF."SEE FBC |
| | 1606.2.2.1. |
| | |
| | WHERE IS THE DETERMINATION FOR THE ZONES |
| | 1 THROUGH 5?SEE FBC 1606.2.3. |
| | |
| | AS AN EXAMPLE: SEE FBC TABLE 1606.2B, |
| | UNDER HEADING "WALL" ZONE 5, EFFECTIVE |
| | WIND AREA 20 SF, READ ACROSS TO COLUMN |
| | NUMBERED 140 MPH, TO FIND 33.7 AND |
| | -44.0.SEE FOOTNOTE 2 TO TABLE 1606.2B. |
| | |
| | GO TO TABLE 1606.2D, USING A MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT OF 50' FIND A COEFFICIENT OF |
| | 1.16 TO BE USED FOR EXPOSURE B. |
| | |
| | 1.16 X -44.0 = -51.04.THIS DOES NOT |
| | AGREE WITH THE NUMBERS IN THE TABLE ON |
| | SHEET S3.02 OR THE GENERAL NOTE #3. |
| | |
| | WILL THERE BE ANY TESTS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | REINFORCED MASONRY?SECTION 04000 OF |
| | THE CITED PROJECT MANUAL DOES NOT SPEAK |
| | TO FREQUENCY OF GROUT TESTS, IF ANY, |
| | PRISM TESTS, IF ANY OR EVEN |
| | MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION.THERE |
| | ARENO QUALIFICATIONS FOR HEIGHTS OF |
| | GROUT LIFT, CLEAN OUT, CORE SIZE OR ANY |
| | SIGNIFICANT PORITION OF THE CRITERIA |
| | CONTAINED IN ACI 530-99/ASCE 5-99/TMS |
| | 402-99, AS NOTED IN FBC 2103.1. |
| | |
| | THE DRAFTSTOPPING ON SHEET A5.08 DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR TO BE EFFECTIVELY PLACED. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2305.2.3 EXCEPTION #3 |
| | FOR BEST APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | THE ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE |
| | ON FORM 400.SEE FBC 13-400.0 AND |
| | 13-101.2.1.ENSURE ALL SIGNATURES AS |
| | REQUIRED ON THAT FORM ARE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | SHEET A7.01 SHOWS A SLAB RECESS OF |
| | 3/4",THE CITY HAS AMENDED THIS CODE |
| | SECTION AND REQUIRES 1.5".PLEASE |
| | REVISE AS NECESSARY. |
