| Date |
Text |
| 2002-12-27 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-2ND FLOOR PLAN DOESN'T MATCH EXTERIOR |
| | REAR ELEVATION LOCATION OF WINDOW. |
| | 2-FRAMING PLANS ARE VERY CONFUSING AND |
| | MISSING STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND SPECS: |
| | A)TRUSS GIRDERS DON'T SHOW ANY POST AT |
| | THE ENDS. |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AT |
| | FRONT ELEVATION CONSTRUCTION SHOWING |
| | ATTACHMENT OF FRAMED WALL TO GIRDER |
| | TRUSS AND ATTACHMENT OF GIRDER TRUSS |
| | AT THE ENDS. |
| | C)CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE ONLY A COUPLE |
| | OF SHEARWALLS SHOWN ON TWO SIDES ONLY. |
| | WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER SIDES? |
| | D)PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR FRAMING |
| | AT THE CORNERS. HOW ARE THE LOADS |
| | TRANSFERRED AT CORNERS? |
| | E)FOUNDATION PLAN DON'T MATCH BEARING |
| | WALLS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN. |
| | F)2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN IS MISSING |
| | SPECS FOR SOME HEADERS. |
| | G)REVISE/UPDATE ANCHOR SCHEDULE. SEE USP |
| | CATALOGUE FOR PROPER CONNECTOR AND |
| | ENGINEERED VALUES. PROVIDE ENGINEERING |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR VALUES THAT ARE |
| | DIFFERENT FROM THOSE PUBLISHED IN THE |
| | USP CATALOGUE. |
| | H)SOME CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLANS DON'T RESIST CALCULATED |
| | LOADS SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | SECTION 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | 3-SPECIFY CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE |
| | SLAB OR CLEARLY SPECIFY SUPPORTS FOR |
| | WWM. SEE SEC. 1909.3 FBC 2001. |
| | 4-SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS AT BATH #2 AND |
| | AT FAMILY AREA. SEE PLANS AND SECTION |
| | 2405.2 FBC 2001. |
| | 5-PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR |
| | INSTALLATION OF STEEL PIPE AT GARAGE |
| | FOR PROTECTION OF WATER HEATER. |
| | SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | 6-PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS ABOVE GARAGE, |
| | MAIN ROOF AND 2ND FLOOR. |
| | SEC. 2309.6 FBC 2001. |
| | 7-PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTOR AT 1ST FLOOR BY |
| | THE STAIRS. SEC. 905.2.2 FBC 2001. |
| | 8-SITE SPECIFIC STORM SHUTTERS INSTALLA- |
| | TION WILL REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF |
| | COMPLIANCE AND INSTALLATION AFFIDAVIT |
| | AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY IMPLEMENTATION |
| | STANDARD FOR HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION (ITEMS 15, 16 AND 17). |
| | 9-NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A)ROOF CONCRETE TILE: ONE SUBMITTED IS |
| | EXPIRED. |
| | B)GARAGE DOORS: PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | DELETED FROM SBCCI. NEED A NEW ONE. |
| | |
| | 10-REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: UNDER THE |
| | ATTIC AREA IS INCORRECT. SEE SECTION |
| | 604.1.A.1 OF CHAPTER 13 OF FBC 2001. |
| | 11-OWES $236.27 FOR UPDATED VALUE AND |
| | RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER CORREC- |
| | TIONS ARE MADE TO THE ORIGINAL CAD DWGS |
| | IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | IN THE PAST CORRECTIONS WERE DONE ON THE |
| | BLUEPRINTS. DOES WHY MOST OF THE |
| | COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED ON PREVIEWS PLAN |
| | REVIEWS BUT THEY WERE NOT REVISED ON THE |
| | ORIGINAL CAD DRAWINGS. |
