| Date |
Text |
| 2002-11-05 00:00:00 | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 02101504 |
| | ADD: 720 KAYE STREET |
| | CONT: JAMES T. WADSWORTH JR |
| | TEL: (561)421-1742 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | |
| | LOOK FOR COMMENTS BY THE OTHER PLAN |
| | REVIEW DISCIPLINES THAT MAY BE WRITTEN |
| | ON THE APPLICATION, PLANS, OR ATTACHED |
| | SEPARATELY. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS |
| | PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | ANDREMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESS- ARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A |
| | DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDEN- |
| | TIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE |
| | WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND, WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU |
| | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1) CORRECTION: SHEET A-1 GENERAL NOTES, |
| | NOTE:1) WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS |
| | RECEIVE APPROVED SHUTTER PER FBC 2315? |
| | PLEASE CORRECT CODE SECTION, THIS |
| | REFERSTO HIGH WIND HURRICANE ZONES, |
| | DADE / |
| | BROWARD CONTIES. |
| | |
| | 2) CORRECTION: SHEET A-1 GENERAL NOTES, |
| | NOTE:2) EGRESS WINDOWS SHALL MEET |
| | THEREQUIREMENTS OF FBC 3122B, CORRECT!!! |
| | |
| | 3) SOIL STATEMENT CLARIFY,2500LBS/ SQ |
| | FTBY RATIONAL ANLYSIS, EXPLAIN TESTING |
| | PROCEDURES TO ACHIEVE THIS VALUE? |
| | |
| | 4) PERMIT VALUE: VALUE IS LOW, VALUATION |
| | RATES FOR SUCH PERMIT FEES SHALL BE |
| | BASED ON, STANDARD BUILDING CODE EVALUA- |
| | TION TABLES LATEST EDITION, CITY CODE |
| | ORDANANCE # 3355-00.SUCH PERMIT FEES |
| | SHALL INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS, LABOR AND |
| | ASSOCIATED FEES, TOTAL COST OF JOB. THIS |
| | WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | LAND VALUE $36,300.00 |
| | IMPROVEMENT VALUE 95,885.00 |
| | DEPENDING ON THE CALCULATED VALUE |
| | OF THE JOB SEC 3407.1.7.2 WILL ESTABLISH |
| | TO WHAT EXTENT THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | MADE TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE TOTAL |
| | SCOPE OF WORK THAT SHALL BE REQUIRED, |
| | ADDITONS THAT WERE PARTIALLY ENCLOSED, |
| | THE SIZE OF EXISTING OPENINGS VS THE |
| | NEW SIZES. AREAS OF THE BUILDING THAT |
| | HAVE NO FOUNDATION, DISCOVERED THROUGH A |
| | FIELD INVESTIGATION BY CHIEF INSPECTOR |
| | LOU HATTEN. |
| | |
| | 6)PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND |
| | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS (MANUAL J) |
| | AS REQUIRED BY THE 2001 FLORIDA ENERGY |
| | EFFICIENTCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUC- |
| | TION. PLANS INDICATE NO ADDITIONAL A/C |
| | SQ FT. INDICATE A/C FOR THE 1ST FLOOR |
| | LIVING AREA, THIS IS SUPPOSEDLY NEW |
| | WORK. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET GN-1 PLYWOOD FASTENING SCHEDULE |
| | DELETE ANY REFRENCES TO SEMCO PRODUCTS, |
| | THEY ARE OUT OF BUSINESS. REFRENCE TO |
| | GUN NAILS IF THEY ARE A SMALLER DIA. |
| | THAN 0.131" THE MANUFACTURER IS TO SPEC- |
| | IFY WHAT THE EQUIVELENT SPACING SHALL BE |
| | |
| | 8) PLANS ARE MISSING THE FLOOR & CEILING |
| | JOIST LAYOUT FOR THE FIRST & SECOND |
| | FLOOR PLUS THE INTERIOR BEARING WALLS. |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET A-1 LOWER LEFT DETAIL, |
| | ROOF FRAMING @ COVERED ENTRY, MISSING |
| | INFORMATION, DETAIL OF NEW MAIN ENTRY, |
| | HEADER SIZE SPECIES OF WOOD, THE AMOUNT |
| | OF FULL STUDS REQUIRED, JACK STUDS, THE |
| | UPLIFT LOADS, GRAVITY LOADS, THE ANCHOR- |
| | ING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | THE DETAIL INDICATES 5/8" ANCHORBOLT |
| | BUT NOT THE LENGTH? THERE IS NO INFORMA- |
| | TION ON THE SIZE OF THE GIRDER TRUSS, |
| | SINGLE MEMBER OR DOUBLE, HEIGTH OF THE |
| | GIRDER? THE STEEL COLUMN DOESN'T INDI- |
| | CATE THE WIDTH OF THE SEAT. |
| | DETAIL 3/A-2, 4/A-2 ARE NOT INDICATED |
| | WHERE THEY ARE TO BE USED, OR THE LOADS |
| | TO BE IMPOSED ON THEM? THE ENTRY DETAIL |
| | DOESN'T INDICATE HOW THE GIRDERS ENDING |
| | AT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ARE TO BE SUPP |
| | ORTED? |
| | |
| | 10) AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN "NO FOUINDA |
| | TION" PLEASE PROVIDE HOW STRUCTURE SHALL |
| | BE SHORED UP WHILE FOUNDATION IS CON- |
| | STRUCTED, GIVE SHORING AND FOUNDATION |
| | DETAIL WITH FOOTING SIZE, STEEL AND |
| | ANCHORING. |
| | |
| | 11) NEW STAIRWAY, 1007.3.1 THE SUM OF |
| | 2 RISERS + 1 TREAD SHALL EQUAL BETWEEN |
| | 14" & 25". THE PLAN ALSO INDICATES THE |
| | USE OF 14 RISERS @ 6"= 84". THE CEILING |
| | HEIGTH IS 7'-8" OR 92" PLUS THE FLOOR |
| | JOIST AND FLOORING OF 2ND FLOOR? |
| | |
| | 12) EXISTING PATIO, NO NEW WORK, FIELD |
| | INVESTIGATION, INDICATES A 30" CBS WING |
| | WALL, WITH A OPEN SCREEN PORCH, WITH A |
| | 2X6" OPEN PLANK CEILING, NO INFORMATION |
| | IS GIVEN ON THE ENCLOSING OF THIS STRUC- |
| | TURE, NOR INFORMATION ON THE RESISTEING |
| | OF UPLIFT ON THE EXISTING STEM WALL? |
| | THIS AREA TO BE A/C? THE EXISTING ROOF |
| | SHEATHING THICKNESS, SPACING OF RAFTERS, |
| | NOR THE ANCHOR REQUIUREMENTS OF THE |
| | FRAME WALL, RAFTERS NOR LEDGER? |
| | |
| | 13) FRONT ELEVATION, 2ND FLOOR, THERE IS |
| | NO DETAILS OF THE FRAMING ABOVE THE NEW |
| | WINDOWS NOR ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS, NO IN- |
| | FORMATION ON THE DECORATIVE ADDITON TO |
| | THE PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 14)1503.3 COPING. PARARET WALLS SHALL |
| | BE PROPERLY COPED WITH NONCOMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIALS OF A WIDTH NO LESS THAN THE |
| | THICKNESS OF THE PARAPET WALL. |
| | |
| | 15) RIGHT ELEVATION SHED ROOF EXISTING |
| | FOR WATER HEATER, NOT ENCLOSED, GIVE |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AS LISTED UNDER |
| | COMMENT # 12. |
| | |
| | 16) EXTERIOR ENTRY TO 2ND FLOOR, INDI- |
| | CATE HOW THE ARCHED ROOF AND CEILING |
| | ARE TO BE ENCORPORATED WITH THE ARCHED |
| | WINDOWS OF THE SIDE VIEW? |
| | |
| | 17)1503.4 ROOF DRAINS UNLESS ROOFS ARE |
| | SLOPED TO DRAIN OVER THE ROOF EDGE, ROOF |
| | DRAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOWEST |
| | POINT OF THE ROOF. WHERE REQUIRED FOR |
| | ROOF DRAINAGE,SCUPPERS SHALL BE LOCATED |
| | AS DETERMINED BY THE ROOF SLOPE AND CON- |
| | TRIBUTING ROOF AREA. |
| | |
| | 18)1503.4.2 OVERFLOW DRAINS SHALL BE |
| | THE SAME SIZE AS ROOF DRAINS, INSTALLED |
| | WITH THE INLET FLOW LINE LOCATED 2" |
| | ABOVE THE LOWEST POINT OF THE ROOF LINE. |
| | OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 4"IN HEIGTH AND SHALL BE PLACED IN WALLS |
| | OR PARARETS WITH THE INLET FLOW LINE |
| | NOT LESS THAN 2" ABOVE THE ROOF SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 19) 1503.4.4 PROTECTION AGAINST DECAY & |
| | TERMITES. CONDENSATE LINES & ROOF DOWN |
| | SPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1 FT. |
| | AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL, |
| | WHETHER BY UNDERGROUND PIPING, TAIL EX- |
| | TENSIONS, OR SPLASH BLOCKS. |
| | |
| | 20) FL. BLD CODE 1606.1.7 THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND SHALL BE |
| | SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, |
| | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH |
| | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING |
| | CATEGORY |
| | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE"B" NOT D |
| | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, 0.18 |
| | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN |
| | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. |
| | |
| | ALSO WIND PRESSURE ASCE 7-98! |
| | |
| | 21) WINDOWS INDICATED ON PLAN ARE TO BE |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS, INDICATE THE CLEAR |
| | OPENING SIZE OF THESE WINDOWS, INDICATE |
| | THE HINGE SIDE FOR CASEMENT WINDOW? |
| | |
| | 22)1606.1.4(1) IN WIND BORNE DEBRIS |
| | REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| | POSITIVE PRESSURE IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE |
| | ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS UNLESS SUCH |
| | GLAZING IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED |
| | WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEET- |
| | ING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM |
| | E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996 OR MIAMI-DADE. |
| | |
| | 1) GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FT |
| | OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | LARGE MISSLE TEST.MISSING REPORTS: |
| | A) WINDOWS |
| | B) DOORS |
| | C) MULLIONS |
| | D) STORM SHUTTERS |
| | E)ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | 23)FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORT, SBCCI OR DADE COUNTY |
| | REPORT ARE ACCEPTED. |
| | |
| | 24) 1707.4.5.1 MULLIONS OCCURRING |
| | BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL WINDOW AND GLASS |
| | DOOR ASSEMBLIES. TESTING REPORTS ARE |
| | REQUIRED BY AN APPROVED TESTING |
| | LABORATORY OR BE ENGINEERED. |
| | |
| | 25) 1707.4.5.2 MULLIONS SHALL BE DESIGN- |
| | ED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS |
| | APPLIED BY THE WINDOW OR DOOR ASSEMBLIES |
| | TO THE ROUGH OPENING SUBTRATE. |
| | |
| | 26)PROVIDE STORM PANEL INFORMATION WITH |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN WITH |
| | SPECIFIC ANCHORS AND MOUNTING TO BE USED |
| | FOR ALL NON-IMPACT GLAZING. |
| | FBC 1606.1.4. |
| | |
| | 27)FL BLD CODE 2001 SECTION 103.6, |
| | 1606.1.4, 1707.4 & 3401.7.2.4. |
| | PROCEDURES: 1(B) A COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE SUMMARIZING & IDENTIFYING |
| | OPENING SIZES, STORY HEIGHTS, UNIT MARK |
| | NUMBERS, UNIT SPANS/WIDTHS, UNIT STORM |
| | BAR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS, WALL PRES- |
| | SURE ZONES, SLAT TYPES, ETC., SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | TO FACILITATE PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | 28)FL BLD CODE 2001 SECTION 103.6, |
| | 1606.1.4, 1707.4 & 3401.7.2.4. |
| | PROCEDURES: 1(B) A COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE SUMMARIZING & IDENTIFYING |
| | OPENING SIZES, STORY HEIGHTS, UNIT MARK |
| | NUMBERS, UNIT SPANS/WIDTHS, UNIT STORM |
| | BAR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS, WALL PRES- |
| | SURE ZONES, SLAT TYPES, ETC., SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | TO FACILITATE PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 29) 1606.4.4 ANCHOR METHODS. PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION FOR INSTALLATION OF DOOR |
| | AND WINDOW BUCKS. |
| | |
| | 30) 1707.4.4.1 ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS: |
| | WINDOW & DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE ANCHOR |
| | ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| | MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO |
| | ACHIEVE THEDESIGN PRESSURE SPECIFIED. |
| | SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEM USED FOR |
| | THE SUBSTRATE NOT SPECIFIED BY THE |
| | FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE |
| | EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING AS DEMONSTRA- |
| | TED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. |
| | |
| | 31) INDICATE THE USAGE OF 2/D-1 THIS DE- |
| | TAIL CAN NOT BE USED FOR ANY BEARING |
| | WALL, NOT INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN! |
| | |
| | LOOK FOR COMMENTS BY THE OTHER PLAN |
| | REVIEW DISCIPLINES THAT MAY BE WRITTEN |
| | ON THE APPLICATION, PLANS, OR ATTACHED |
| | SEPARATELY. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS |
| | PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION AND |
| | REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESS- |
| | ARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A |
| | DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDEN- |
| | TIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE |
| | WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND, WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU |
| | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | PLAN REVIEW |
| | TEL: (561)659-8096 EX.8412 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
