| Date |
Text |
| 2003-02-27 00:00:00 | SECOND PAID PLAN REVIEW NOT A PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND |
| | APPEALS AT A SPECIAL HEARING ON 1/8/03, |
| | IN THEIR CASE # 1224, GRANTED A |
| | VARIANCE TO THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION |
| | 1014.1.1 OF THE 2001 FBC, THAT AT LEAST |
| | 50% OF THE LONG SIDE OF THE BALCONY BE |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | A CONDITION IN THE ORDER GRANTING THE |
| | VARIANCE IS THAT THE BALCONY/STAIR AREA |
| | BE FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED.SECTION |
| | 903.2 OF THE FBC REQUIRES IN PART, |
| | "AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN LIEU |
| | OF,OR AS AN ALTERNATE TO OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS, AS PERMITTED BY THIS |
| | CODE, SHALL BE CONSIDERED REQUIRED |
| | SYSTEMS AND SHALL COMPLYWITH NFPA 13. |
| | |
| | THE FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN BY WAYNE |
| | AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, IS AN |
| | NFPA 13R SYSTEM AND DOES NOT COMPLY FOR |
| | THE "BREEZE WAY" AREA. |
| | |
| | FBC 1006.2.2 REQUIRES IN PART, THAT |
| | "ALLPORTIONS OF THE STAIRWAYS ON EACH |
| | LEVEL BE 1/2 THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE |
| | APART OF THE AREA SERVED".THE PLANS |
| | DO NOT COMPLY. |
| | |
| | AS PROVIDED FOR IN FBC 101.4.1, |
| | THE DESIGNER IS ADVISED THAT ABOVE IS A |
| | "SPECIFIC" REQUIREMENT AND TAKES |
| | PRECEDENCE OVER "GENERAL" REQUIREMENTS. |
| | TO THAT END, THE EXCEPTION IN FBC |
| | 1004.1 IS NOT APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | AS NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, IMPACT |
| | FEES MUST BE PAID, A RESIDENT INSPECTOR |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED, SPECIAL DISPENSATION |
| | FOR THE SHUTTERS IN LIEU OF IMPACT |
| | RESISTANT GLAZING AND A PROPERTY SURVEY |
| | WHENEVER THE PERMITS ARE APPLIED FOR. |
