| Date |
Text |
| 2002-10-10 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING IS A REVIEW OF THE PLAN |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL MADE IN REPONSE TO JIM |
| | WITMER'S 9/27/02 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THAT PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | |
| | 1) FBC 104.3.1.1MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW |
| | CRITERIA.THIS COMMENT WAS NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.SUBMIT A FLOOR PLAN SHOWING |
| | ANY CHANGE IN FLOOR LEVEL AT THE FORMER |
| | GARAGE DOOR LOCATION, THE WIDTH/LOCATION |
| | OF THE FAMILY ROOM DOORWAY, AND THE |
| | OVERALL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED FAMILY ROOM |
| | SO THAT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | EGRESS (FBC 1012.1.3 AND TABLE 1004) AND |
| | FOR LIGHT AND VENTILATION TO THE NEW |
| | ROOM CAN BE ASSESSED.SUBMIT A CROSS- |
| | SECTIONAL VIEW OF THE WALL SHOWING THE |
| | PROPOSED WALL CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING |
| | SHEATHING) FROM FOUNDATION/SLAB TO ROOF. |
| | |
| | 3,4,5) FBC 1606THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN ADDRESSED.THE PROPOSED 2-1/2" |
| | TAPCONS WILL NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT |
| | EMBEDMENT WHEN USED TO ANCHOR DOWN THE |
| | 2"X 4" SILL PLATE.RE-SPECIFY TO ENSURE |
| | NO LESS THAN 1-1/4" EMBEDMENT. THE PLANS |
| | DO NOT STATE TO WHAT SUBSTRATE THE SILL |
| | PLATE IS BEING ATTACHED.IS THERE A |
| | SLAB AT THIS LOCATION AND WHAT IS THE |
| | EDGE THICKNESS?THE PROPOSED MEANS OF |
| | ATTACHMENT FOR THE SIDES AND TOP OF THE |
| | INFILL WALL FRAMEWORK IS NOT CLEAR FROM |
| | THE PLANS.CLEARLY SPECIFY THE PROPOSED |
| | ATTACHMENT METHOD ON THE PLANS.ALSO, |
| | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THE EXISTING |
| | CONSTRUCTION AT THE SIDES OF THE OPENING |
| | WHICH WILL BE THE SUBSTRATE TO WHICH THE |
| | NEW WALL WILL BE ATTACHED.THE PLANS |
| | SHALL SPECIFY THE MEANS OF ATTACHMENT OF |
| | THE NEW WINDOW TO THE WINDOW BUCK. |
| | |
| | THREE DIFFERENT WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED, INCLUDING BOTH |
| | ARCHED AND RECTANGULAR WINDOWS.WHICH |
| | PRODUCT IS TO BE USED?THE APPROPRIATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL DRAWINGS/TABLES SHALL |
| | BE MARKED TO SHOW WHICH WINDOW TYPE/SIZE |
| | IS PROPOSED.SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE |
| | RELEVANT PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | - TEXT SHEETS 2 & 3 AND ALL OF THE |
| | DRAWING SHEETS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE |
| | SERIES PA-14 ALUMINUM SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA#01-0226.04 ARE FROM |
| | A DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | (NOA# 97-1027.09) WHICH EXPIRED 7-9-01. |
| | - DRAWING SHEET 1 OF THE RECTANGULAR |
| | ALUMINUM FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 01-0209.11 IS A VERY POOR REDUCED |
| | SIZE COPY WHICH CANNOT BE READ.ALSO, |
| | THE 11" X 14" DRAWING SHEET 'PA14....' |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT |
| | PART OF THE APPROVAL DOCUMENT AND SHALL |
| | BE REMOVED FROM THE PACK. |
| | - DRAWING SHEET 1 OF THE RADIUS ARCH |
| | ALUMINUM FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 01-0209.10 IS AGAIN A VERY POOR |
| | REDUCED SIZE COPY WHICH CANNOT BE READ. |
| | THE 11"X 14" DRAWING SHEET 'PA14....' |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT |
| | PART OF THE APPROVAL DOCUMENT AND SHALL |
| | BE REMOVED FROM THE PACK. |
| | - SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF AN APPROPRIATE |
| | CURRENT AND LEGIGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | THE WINDOW. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL: |
| | JIM WITMER(561) 659 8096 EXT 8412 |
| | ROBERT BROWNEXT 8499 |
