| Date |
Text |
| 2002-10-09 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING IS A REVIEW OF THE PLAN |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL MADE IN RESPONSE J.WITMER'S |
| | 8/27/02 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | |
| | CITY CODE 12-22(B)(1)'SUBSTANTIAL |
| | IMPROVEMENT' OF THE EXISTING HOME SHALL |
| | REQUIRE THE LOWEST FLOOR TO BE ELEVATED |
| | TO 7'-6" NGVD, WHICH IS 6" ABOVE BASE |
| | FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7'-0" NGVD. ACCORDING |
| | TO CITY CODE 12-17, THE PROPOSED WORK |
| | VALUED AT $81,500 IS 'SUBSTANTIAL |
| | IMPROVEMENT' BECAUSE IT REPRESENTS A |
| | REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR |
| | IMPROVEMENT COST EXCEEDING 50% 0F THE |
| | MARKET VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE.PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER LISTS |
| | THE MARKET VALUE AS $154,252.EITHER, |
| | PROVIDE PROPOSALS TO RAISE THE FLOOR |
| | LEVEL, REDUCE THE SCOPE OF WORK TO |
| | ACHIEVE A COST LESS THAN 50% OF THE |
| | MARKET VALUE, OR SUBMIT A LICENSED |
| | APPRAISER'S REPORT TO JUSTIFY A HIGHER |
| | MARKET VALUE OF AT LEAST 200% OF THE |
| | COST OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. |
| | |
| | FBC 13-103.0THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORM IS NOT COMPLETE.ENTER |
| | THE PERMIT# (02080881), JURISDICTION# |
| | (604700), THE PERMITTING OFFICE (CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH) AND BUILDING TYPE UNDER |
| | ITEM #2. SEE ALSO, THE END COMMENT WHICH |
| | REFERS TO FBC 3401.7.1.2 |
| | |
| | FBC 1606.1.4HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION. SUBMITTAL OF SHUTTER DETAILS |
| | IS NOTED.SUBMIT A PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE-SPECIFIC ENGINEERING (SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED) FOR THE PROPOSED STORM SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | FBC 1504.1WIND RESISTANCE OF ROOFS. |
| | SHEETS 2 AND 11 OF THE SUBMITTED TAMKO |
| | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 01-0509.01, STATE THAT THE |
| | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE SYSTEM |
| | IS -45PSF.THIS IS LESS THAN THE |
| | PERIMETER ROOF WIND LOAD FOR THE |
| | BUILDING.THE PRODUCT IS NOT SUITABLE |
| | FOR THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | FBC 3401.7.1.2ADDITIONS TO EXISTING |
| | BUILDINGS.THE AREA OF THE ADDITION |
| | EXCEEDS 25% OF THE FLOOR OF THE AREA OF |
| | THE EXISTING BUILDING, SO BOTH THE |
| | ADDITION AND THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | COMBINED SHALL BE MADE TO COMPLY WITH |
| | ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS, EXCEPT THAT THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING SHALL NOT BE MADE TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE CODE.PROVIDE DETAILS TO SHOW |
| | THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING COMPLIES WITH |
| | FBC 1005.4.4 (MIN. 24"H X 20"W EGRESS |
| | WINDOWS FOR BEDROOMS) AND FBC 13-600.0 |
| | (ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE). |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL: |
| | JIM WITMER (561) 659 8096 EXT 8412 OR |
| | ROBERT BROWN EXT 8499 |
