| Date |
Text |
| 2006-01-17 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 02071105 |
| | ADD: 539 OGSTON ST |
| | CONT: H. CANO |
| | TEL: (561)543-1290 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW / REVISION |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THIS PERMIT WAS LET AS A SHELL PERMIT |
| | AND FOR SINGLE TENANT.UPDATE VALUE OF |
| | PERMIT IF TENANT BUILD OUT IS TO BE PART |
| | OF THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2)FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, |
| | PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE FOR A TENANT BUILD |
| | OUT: |
| | A) BAY # 1 NO REST ROOM. |
| | |
| | B) BAY # 2&3 BOTH INDICATE DOOR OPENINGS |
| | |
| | BUT NO INFORMATION AS TOO DOOR SWING FOR |
| | INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| | 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES |
| | AT DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARENCES |
| | AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC OR |
| | POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| | FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH |
| | IN THE REQUIRED CLEARENCES SHALL BE |
| | CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| | |
| | C) PLANS INDICATE USE OF FIRE STOPPING |
| | MATERIALS (A& B). PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | TECHNICAL SHEETS OF THE ACTUAL SYSTEM TO |
| | BE USED. |
| | 705.7.1 JOINTS INSTALLED IN OR BE- |
| | TWEEN FIRE RESISTANT WALLS, FIRE RESIS- |
| | TANT FLOORS OR FLOOR/ CEILING ASSEMBLIES |
| | AND FIRE RESISTANT ROOFS OR ROOF/ CEIL- |
| | ING ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN |
| | APPROVED FIRE RESISTANT JOINT SYSTEM |
| | DESIGNED TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF FIRE |
| | FOR A PERIOD NOT LESS THAN THE RE- |
| | QUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE |
| | WALL, FLOOR OR FLOOR IN OR BETWEEN |
| | WHICH IT IS INSTALLED. |
| | 705.1.2 PENETRATIONS SHALL BE PRO- |
| | TECTED BY AN APPROVED PENETRATION FIRE- |
| | STOP SYSTEM AS TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | ASTM E 814, WITH A MINIMUM POSITIVE |
| | PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.01 INCH OF |
| | WATER COLUMN AND AN F RATING OF NOT LESS |
| | THAN REQUIRED RATING OF THE WALL |
| | PENETRATED. |
| | PROVIDE A FLEXIBLE SEALANT AT THE |
| | WALL/ ROOF DECK DETAILING SYSTEM TO BE |
| | USED. |
| | |
| | D) 704.2.1.4 CORRIDOR PARTITIONS, SMOKE |
| | STOP PARTITIONS, HORIZONTAL EXIT PART- |
| | ITIONS, EXIT ENCLOSURES, AND FIRE |
| | RATED WALLS REQUIRED TO HAVE PROTECTED |
| | OPENINGS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY AND |
| | PERMANETLY IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNS OR |
| | STENCILING IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE |
| | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. SUCH IDEN |
| | TIFICATION SHALL BE ABOVE ANY DECORATIVE |
| | CEILING CEILING AND IN CONCEALED SPACES. |
| | SUGGESTED WORDING" FIRE & SMOKE BARRIER |
| | PROTECT ALL OPENINGS". |
| | |
| | E) INSPECTION HISTORY INDICATES A |
| | FAILURE NEEDS FOR INFORMATION FOR GARAGE |
| | DOOR ANCHOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | F) PLANS DO NOT INDICATE IF THE BATHROOM |
| | |
| | AND OFFICE WALLS ARE TO CONTINUE TO THE |
| | ROOF DECK ABOVE? PLANS DO NOT INDICATE |
| | A CEILING ASSEMBLY TYPE FOR THE OFFICE |
| | NOR THE RESTROOMS. |
| | |
| | G) PLANS ONLY PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | |
| | FIRE RATED WALL, PLANS INDICATE USE OF |
| | WOOD STUDS FOR THE OFFICE AND RESTROOM |
| | PARTITIONS, DOES THE STUDS CONTINUE TO |
| | THE ROOF DECK? IF NOT ," NOTE" SIGNAGE |
| | MUST BE PROVIDED INDICATINGAREA ABOVE |
| | IS NOT TO BE USED FOR STORAGE. IF |
| | STORAGE IS AN OPTION PROVIDE THE |
| | FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | 106.4.2 STORAGE & FACTORY- INDUS- |
| | TRIAL OCCUPANCIES. IT SHALL BE THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER, AGENT, |
| | PROPIETOR OR OCCUPANT OF GROUP S AND |
| | GROUP F OCCUPANCIES, OR ANY OCCUPANCY |
| | WHERE EXCESSIVE FLOOR LOADING IS LIKELY |
| | TO OCCUR, TO EMPLOY A COMPETENT ARCHI- |
| | TECT OR ENGINEER IN COMPUTING THE SAFE |
| | FLOOR LOAD CAPACITY. ALL SUCH COMPUTA- |
| | TIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY AN AFFA- |
| | DAVIT FROM THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER |
| | STATING THE SAFE ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOADS |
| | ON EACH FLOOR IN POUNDS PER SQ FT.THE |
| | COMPUTATIONS & AFFADAVIT SHALL BE FILED |
| | AS A PERMANENT RECORD OF THE BLDG DEPT. |
| | 106.4.3.SIGNS REQUIRED. IN EVERY |
| | BUILDING OR PART OF A BUILDING USED FOR |
| | STORAGE, INDUSTRIAL OR HAZARDOUS PUR- |
| | POSES, THE SAFE FLOOR LOADS, AS REVIEWED |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ON THE PLAN, |
| | SHALL BE MARKED ON PLATES OF APPROVED DE |
| | SIGN WHICH SHALL BE SUPPLIED & SECURELY |
| | AFFIXED BY THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING IN |
| | A CONSPICUOUS PLACE IN EACH STORY TO |
| | WHICH THEY RELATE. SUCH PLATES SHALL NOT |
| | BE REMOVEDOR DEFACED, & IF LOST, |
| | REMOVED THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING SHALL |
| | REPLACE THEM. |
| | |
| | H) IS THE OFFICE TO BE AIR CONDITIONED? |
| | |
| | I) ELECTRICAL PLANS WILL NEED TO BE UP |
| | DATED TO SHOW THE NEW LAY OUT, NEW |
| | OFFICE, AND EXIT LIGHTING. |
| | |
| | J) PLANS ALSO NEED TO INDICTE THE |
| | OCCUPANCY FOR EACH SPACE? IF DIFFERENT |
| | OCCUAPNCIES MAY REQUIRE MORE THAN A 1 HR |
| | RATED WALL. SEE TABLE 704.1. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY OCCUR ON THE |
| | NEXT REVIEW DEPENDING ON THE ANSWERS TO |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
