| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-06 13:39:02 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) TRUSS PACKAGE NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED |
| | IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | B) ALL DRAWINGS, INCLUDING GENERAL DETAILS, LETTERS |
| | NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED WITH WITH ORIGINAL SEAL, |
| | SIGNATURE AND DATE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA |
| | STATUTEAND SEC. 61G15-23 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | C) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES TO HAVE ENGINEER'S |
| | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, NOT COPIES, AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER |
| | 471 FLORIDA STATUTEAND SEC. 61G15-23 FLORIDA |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | |
| | D) ALL DESIGN LOADS SHOWN IN GENERAL DETAILS AND |
| | INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES TO MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, |
| | COORDINATEWITH ITEM 1(E) BELOW. |
| | |
| | E) TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED TO SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE |
| | LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 1604.1 FBC 2001. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- ROOF TILE UPLIFT TEST REPORT REFERENCES FBC 2004. |
| | THIS BUILDING WASDESIGNED AND APPROVED UNDER FBC |
| | 2001. REVISE AS REQUIRED.THERE IS NOT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR CONCRETE TILE, THEREFORE UNABLE |
| | TO VERIFY WHICH TESTING WAS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE 2 COMPLETE COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | NOT JUST A LIST OFNOA NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | 4- NOA 02-0131.03 EXPIRED ON AUGUST 31, 2006. |
| | THEREFORE, IT CAN'T BE USED. |
| | |
| | 5-PROVIDEALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AND ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED ON PROVISO DATED 11/21/02 AS |
| | AGREED WITH THE OWNER TO EXPEDITE THE PERMITTING |
| | PROCESS. OWNER IGNORED THIS PROVISO AS WELL AS |
| | REMAINDERGIVEN TO THE OWNER ON 4/19/5 WHEN REVISIONS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED.SEE ATTACHED COPIES. |
| | OWNER TO PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION IN THE |
| | PROVISO DATED 11/21/02. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
