| Date |
Text |
| 2002-10-08 00:00:00 | CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-SURVEY AND PLANS DON'T MATCH. SURVEY |
| | SHOWS OLD HOUSE. NOT THE NEW LAYOUT. |
| | 2-PROVIDE RECEIPT OF PAID IMPACT FEES. |
| | 3-NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WASN'T RECORDED |
| | IN THE COURTHOUSE. |
| | 4-WINDOW SCHEDULE IS NOT CLEAR. EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS SHOW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS. ALSO, CLARIFY SIZES |
| | CALLED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE. EG: WHAT IS |
| | A PELLA #322020? ETC. |
| | 5-SOIL TEST REPORT TO HAVE ORIGINAL SEAL |
| | AND SIGNATURE AS REQ'D BY CHAPTER 471 |
| | FL. STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | 6-THERE WASN'T PRODUCT APPROVAL & STRUC- |
| | TURAL SPECS SUBMITTED FOR THE EPICORE |
| | FLOOR SYSTEM TO BE USED. SEC 104.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 7-ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE REVIEW STAMP AT |
| | ANY PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SHOP DRAWING. |
| | THIS SHOW PROOF OF REVIEW DONE BY HIM. |
| | 8-ITEM #14 FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLIST IS |
| | STILL UNCLEAR.SOME STRUCTURAL WALL |
| | SECTIONS SHOW MONOLITHIC CONCRETE SLAB |
| | AND OTHERS SHOW CONCRETE SLAB WITH |
| | EXPANSION JOINT. CLARIFY WHY?. |
| | RESPONSE TO ITEM #14 CALLS FOR ALL CON |
| | CRETE WORK TO BE MONOLITHIC. SEE STRUC |
| | TURAL WALL SECTIONS AND CLARIFY. |
| | SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | 9-WHERE IS THE BEAM SCHEDULE? SECTION |
| | 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 10-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A)SKYLIGHT. |
| | B)INSWING FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | C)INSWING FRENCH DOORS WITH TRANSOM |
| | ABOVE SINGLE ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PLAN |
| | D)FIXED WINDOWS. SEE SIZES ON PLANS BY |
| | STAIRWAY AND AT MASTER BATHROOM. |
| | E)ROOF TILE. |
| | F)FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. |
| | G)FIREPLACE UL LISTING AND SPECS. |
| | H)BBQ UL LISTING AND SPECS. |
| | 11-SPECIFY HOW TO GET THE R-11 INSUL. AT |
| | MASONRY WALLS AS SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | ENERGY CALCS.SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 12-PROVIDE FRAMING DETAILS FOR SKYLIGHT. |
| | BUILDING SECTION ON SHEET A-10 DOESN'T |
| | HAVE ENOUGH STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. |
| | SPECIFY ALL FASTENERS. ETC.SECTION |
| | 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | 13-CLARIFY IF USING STORM SHUTTERS OR |
| | MISSILE IMPACT GLASS GLAZING. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR MISSILE |
| | IMPACT GLAZING. IF USING STORM SHUTTER |
| | THEN PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. ALSO, SPECIFY |
| | ON PRODUCT APPROVAL DWGS SPECIFIC |
| | MOUNTING CONDITIONS AND ANCHORS TYPE & |
| | SPACING TO BE USED. SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001 & CITY STANDARD |
| | FOR STORM SHUTTERS INSTALLATION. |
| | 14-OWES $793.83 FOR UPDATED VALUE AND |
| | RADON FEES. |
| | 15-PROVIDE SHORING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- |
| | TIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE |
| | FLOOR SYSTEM AS CALLED FOR EPICORE |
| | SYSTEM. SEC. 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS |
