| Date |
Text |
| 2002-06-17 00:00:00 | SHEET S1 DECLARES A DESIGN BASED ON |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE CALCULATIONS, INCLUDING SOURCE |
| | OF REFERENCE(S) FOR WIND LOADS, AS |
| | PROVIDED FOR IN ASCE 7-98 SECTION |
| | 6.5.8.3.DEMONSTRATE WHAT GUST FACTORS |
| | WERE USED AND IN WHAT COMBINATIONS. |
| | SHOW THE LOAD PER FOOT TRANSFERRED TO |
| | THE MASONRY WALLS BY THE ROOF DIAPHRAGM. |
| | |
| | SHOW THE MASONRY SPECIFICATION CRITERIA |
| | CONTAINED IN ACI 530 1.2.1, |
| | PARTICULARLYLENGTHS OF VERTICAL STEEL |
| | EMBED IN THE |
| | SINGLEBOND BEAMS, GROUT, POUR HEIGHT, |
| | CLEAR GROUT SPACE DIMENSION, ETC. |
| | |
| | S2 WRONGLY CITES ASCE 7-93 AND 110 MPH. |
| | THE 2001 FBC INVOKES ASCE 7-98 AND WEST |
| | PALM BEACH IS IN THE 140 MPH WIND ZONE. |
| | PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE IN |
| | ABOVE REQUESTED CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | THE LINTEL SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1 CALLS |
| | OUT AN 8F22-1B THAT IS NOT FOUND IN THE |
| | JCAST CRETE SCHEDULE, PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | THE INTENT. |
| | |
| | SBCCI REPORT #9933 FOR THE ENTEGRA ROOF |
| | TILE IS RATED FOR A 110 MPH WIND ZONE. |
| | SEE TABLE 1606.1.6.1 EQUIVALENT BASIC |
| | WIND SPEEDS. |
| | |
| | THE METRO-DADE NOA #01-0209.10 "DESIGNER |
| | WINDOWS" HAS AN ILLEGIBLE DRAWING. |
| | |
| | WHAT IS THE DRAWING LABELED BINNINGS PAN |
| | AMERICAN PA 7 11 01 464 INTENDED TO BE |
| | USED FOR? |
| | |
| | NOA 99-0223.04 FOR THE LAWSON MULLIONS, |
| | IS EXPIRED. |
| | |
| | THE ROBICO SHUTTERS, 00-0307.04, DRAWING |
| | IS ILLEGIBLE AND THE COMPONENTS ARE NOT |
| | SELECTED. |
