| Date |
Text |
| 2003-05-12 00:00:00 | 1 THE ARDAMAN UNDERPINNING SCHEME IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED WHEN |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD. |
| | |
| | 2ENERGY CODE FORMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | FBC 13-101.1.1 HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED |
| | (FORM 400C) |
| | |
| | 3 SPEC 05520-1 HANDRAILS HAS DESIGN |
| | LOADS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 1608.2. |
| | |
| | 4IF TEST AND/OR NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE |
| | REPORTS FOR THE ROOF COVERINGS, DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS ARE NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION, SEPARATE PERMITS, |
| | FEES AND INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5THE ARCH/STRUCT SPECIFICATIONS ARE |
| | NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 6SPEC 07240-1 EPS FOAM TRIM IS |
| | PROHIBITTED BY FBC F102.2.7 AMENDED AND |
| | FBC 1404. |
| | |
| | 7SHEET A 1.03, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNITS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 8FBC 1006.1.1 REQUIRES EXIT STAIRS TO |
| | BE ENCLOSED WITH FIRE RATED |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND THE OPTION OF FBC |
| | 412.11 #5 IS APPLICABLE AS WELL. |
| | STAIRS SHOWN AS #5, #6, #8 AND #10 DO |
| | NOT COMPLY, PLEASE REVISE AS NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | 9SHEET LS 1.03, UNITS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, |
| | 9, 10, 13, 16, 27, 30, 33, 34, AND 38 |
| | HAVE TRAVEL DISTANCE GREATER THAN 75' |
| | TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE EXIT ACCESS AND |
| | DO NOT COMPLY WITH FBC 1004.1.2.SEE |
| | ALSO FBC 1004.1.4. |
| | |
| | 10SHEET M7.02, SEQ OF OP NOTES C #1 & |
| | #2 CITES .005 WC DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE. |
| | MINIMUM IS 0.05 PLEASE REVISE |
| | NECESSARY.REFERENCES ON THIS SHEET |
| | AND M4.03 TO ELEVATOR PRESSURIZATION |
| | ARE NOT REFLECTED IN THE FAN SCHEDULE |
| | ONM5.03.PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 11SHEET M 4.03 CALLS FOR A STATIC |
| | PRESSURE SENSOR SET TO MAINTAIN 0.75". |
| | THE MAX PRESSURE WATER COLUMN ALLOWED |
| | BY FBC 1005.6.9.9 IS 0.35". |
| | |
| | 12THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE A |
| | DAMPERED RELIEF OR EXHAUST FAN AT THE |
| | TOP TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 2500 CFM |
| | DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | 13THE UNSIGNED, UNDATED LETTER |
| | "RESPONSE TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT |
| | COMMENTS" ON THE BRITO COHAN LETTER |
| | HEAD HAS BEEN REVIEWED. |
