| Date |
Text |
| 2002-05-09 00:00:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-TRUSS LAYOUT: REVISE/UPDATE AGAIN. |
| | NEED SPECIFIC INFORMATION. SBC 1997 |
| | FOR 110MPH AS PER DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | USED FOR THE BUILDING ARCHITECT. |
| | ASCE 7-93 AND SBC 1997 CAN'T BE MIXED |
| | TOGETHER. SEC. 1606.1.2 SBC 1997. |
| | IF USING ASCE, THEN THE CORRECT ONE IS |
| | ASCE 7-95 FOR 140 MPH. |
| | 2-UPDATE AND PROVIDE LEGIBLE AND CLEAR |
| | GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS AND SPECS |
| | ACCORDING TO THE CODE USED. |
| | 3-CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO ENGINEERS |
| | ON GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS. WHO IS THE |
| | ONE WHO PREPARED THE DETAILS? CHECK |
| | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES FOR |
| | ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES. |
| | SAME APPLIES FOR TRUSS LAYOUT. |
| | 4-REVISE ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS: |
| | A)CODE USED TO BE SPECIFIC INCLUDING THE |
| | YEAR. EG: SBC 1997. |
| | B)DESIGN CRITERIA ON MIDDLE OF PAGE SAYS |
| | SBC/ANSI95 WHILE NOTES AT THE BOTTOM |
| | OF PAGE SAYS ASCE 7-93. SBC AND ASCE |
| | CAN'T BE MIXED TOGETHER (SEC 1606.1.2. |
| | SBC 1997). BESIDES, THE RIGHT ASCE IS |
| | ASCE 7-95 FOR 140MPH. |
| | C)NOTE THAT SAYS THAT THIS TRUSSES |
| | COMPLIES WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS |
| | NOT TRUE. REVIEW FBC 2001. BESIDES |
| | FBC 2001 USES ASCE 7-98. |
| | |
| | 5-ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE A CLEAR ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE WITH CONNECTORS THAT RESIST |
| | THE UPLIFT & LATERAL LOADS CALCULATED |
| | ON ENGINEERED TRUSSES. SOME CONNECTORS |
| | DON'T MEET SUCH LOADS. REVIEW TRUSSES. |
| | **NOTE: ANCHOR SCHEDULE CALLS FOR USP |
| | ETA CONNECTORS. WHAT PAGE ON THE USP |
| | CATALOGUE ARE THESE CONNECTORS LISTED? |
| | I LOOKED THROUGHT CATALOGUE AND WAS |
| | NOT ABLE TO FIND IT. |
| | 6-RE-SUBMITTAL FEES WILL BE APPLIED |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING TRUSSES FOR MULTIPLE |
| | REVIEWS. SEE ATTACHED COPY FOR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FEES. |
