| Date |
Text |
| 2002-01-30 00:00:00 | TRUSSES DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS NOT CONSISTENT. |
| | THE TRUSS LAYOUT AND COVER SHEET ON THE |
| | DRAWINGS LIST 1997 SBC (110MPH WINDLOAD) |
| | AND THE TRUSS DRAWINGS LIST ASCE 7-98 |
| | (145MPH WIND SPEED). IF ASCE IS TO BE |
| | USED, THE CORRECT EDITION IS ASCE 7-95, |
| | UNLESS DESIGNING TO COMPLY WITH 2001 |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. BECAUSE THE |
| | BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO 97 SBC, THE |
| | TRUSSES MUST BE ALSO. |
| | |
| | 2) THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE |
| | IS 17', THE TRUSS DRAWINGS LIST A WALL |
| | HEIGHT OF 15 FT.,AS IF STRUCTURE HAD A |
| | FLAT ROOF. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 3) TRUSS GT5 (3477# UPLIFT) EXCEEDS THE |
| | CAPACITY OF THE SPECIFIED ANCHOR(1400#). |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET 7 OF THE PLANS DOES NOT |
| | INDICATE AN ANCHOR FOR THE CENTER BEAR- |
| | ING POINT (JOINT 16) OF TRUSS GT4. |
| | |
| | 5) TRUSS HG2A IS MISLABELED AS HG2 ON |
| | THE TRUSS LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 6) NO ANCHOR IS INDICATED FOR THE CENTER |
| | BEARING POINT (JOINT 18) OF TRUSS GT1. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | SEMCO AND HUGHES HAVE BEEN PURCHASED BY |
| | USP AND THE UPLIFT VALUES OF SOME |
| | CONNECTORS HAVE BEEN REDUCED. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO CURRENT USP CATALOG AND REVISE |
| | THE ANCHOR SCHEDULE ACCORDINGLY ON |
| | FUTURE SUBMITTALS. |
