| Date |
Text |
| 2001-11-14 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PLAN CHECK# 01101295 |
| | 4017 PINEWOOD AV |
| | CITY PROJECT "GYMNASIUM" |
| | TEL: (561) 848-1988 |
| | |
| | SBC= 1997 STANDARD BUILDING CODE |
| | SBC*= AMENDMENTS/ STANDARD BUILDING CODE |
| | |
| | **** PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER JAN. 1,2002 |
| | FOR PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED |
| | UNDER THE 2001 FLORIDA CODE.****** |
| | |
| | 1)- SBC 104.2.2 ADD INFORMATION REQUIRED |
| | A CURRENT SURVEY INDICATE THE PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION OF BUILDING ON SURVEY FOR TABLE |
| | 600 ISSUES. |
| | |
| | 2)- SBC 1804.2.7.2(3) SOILS REPORT/ WITH |
| | THE MINIMUM SOIL BEARING VALUE. |
| | |
| | 3)- ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH MANUAL "J" |
| | |
| | 4)- A SITE PLAN WITH HANDICAPPED INDICA- |
| | TING AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM CURB FOR |
| | (PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION) AND FROM THE |
| | HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES. |
| | INDICATE WHAT AREAS ARE TO BE ACCESS |
| | IBLE, FOR AXAMPLE FROM THE EXTERIOR |
| | HANDICAPPED RESTROOMS TO THE RECEPTION |
| | AREA DO YOU GO BACK OUT TO THE CITY SIDE |
| | WALKS OR ARE THERE OTHER EGRESS PATHS |
| | NOT INDICATED? |
| | |
| | 5)- S.S.553.79.(5A) THIS BUILDING |
| | QUALIFIES AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING. |
| | THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE GYM, 704 PEOPLE |
| | QUALIFIES THIS BUILDING AS A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING. |
| | A) A THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE ENFORC- |
| | ING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPEC- |
| | IAL INSPECTOR TO PREFORM STRUCTUR |
| | AL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| | THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED |
| | BY THE ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT FOR |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING. |
| | B)- THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR SHALL |
| | MEET WITH ASSISTANT BUILDING OFF- |
| | ICAL DON NEELY FOR APPROVAL. |
| | C)- (3) SETS OF PLANS WILLBE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE PERMITED SET. |
| | |
| | 5)- MISSINGINFORMATION, THE MINIMUM |
| | BUILDING TYPE FOR OCCUPANCY SMALL ASSEM- |
| | BLY? SEE SBC TABLE 500, SPRINKLERED/ |
| | PROTECTED?SQ. FT. UNDER ROOF NOT GIVEN |
| | |
| | 6)- SBC 104.2.2.ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOIN, |
| | SBC TABLE 600 PROPERTY LINE CAN NOT BE |
| | ESTABLISHED, NO SURVEY, TABLE 600 % OF |
| | OPENINGS MAY BE AN ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 7)- FOOTING SCHEDULE- MISSING T.E.-1 |
| | ON FOOTING SCHEDULE, THERE IS A THICKEN |
| | EDGE SECTION ON S-4 WHICH IS TO BE USED? |
| | ONE IS 12" THE THER 16" VERTICALLY? |
| | |
| | 8)- MISSING IS INFORMATIONM FOR MC1/MC2 |
| | 2103.1 ENGINEERED MASONARY DESIGN SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH ASCE 530- COLUMNS 5.6.1.4 |
| | VERTICAL COLUMNS MINIMUM NUMBER OF BARS |
| | SHALL BE FOUR. |
| | |
| | 9)- SBC TABLE 1606. IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF |
| | 1.15 TO BE A USE FACTOR, OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | =>300. |
| | |
| | 10)-SBC 1606.2.6.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | (3) PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORTS WILL BE RE- |
| | QUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: |
| | A) EXTERIOR WINDOWS |
| | B) EXTERIOR DOORS |
| | C) ROLL UP OR GARAGE OVERHEAD DOORS |
| | D) SKYLIGHTS |
| | E) ROFFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | THE PLANS ARE LACKING SUFFICIENT INFORMA |
| | TION TO DO A THOROUGH PLAN REVIEW AT |
| | THIS TIME. THE QUESTIONS RAISED UNDER |
| | THIS REVIEW WILL RAISE ADDITIONAL |
| | QUESTIONS NOT ABLE TO BE ANSWER PRESENT- |
| | LY. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096 X 8412 |
