| Date |
Text |
| 2001-11-16 00:00:00 | THE SHEET TITLED TABULAR DATA NOTES 3 |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACES USING THE |
| | FORMULA OF 2% OF THE TOTAL.THAT IS |
| | INCORRECT.THE FACBC 4.1.2 (5) |
| | REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 5 SPACES FOR |
| | PARKING LOTS HAVING 101 TO 150 TOTAL |
| | SPACES. |
| | |
| | SHOW THE VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE REQUIRED |
| | BY FACBC 4.1.2 (5) (B). |
| | |
| | SHEET A2.01 SHOWS THE HC SPACES PROPOSED |
| | TO BE 8'-8" WIDE.THE FACBC 4.6.3 |
| | MANDATES 12' WIDE PARKING SPACES. |
| | PLEASE REVISE AS NECESSARY.SEE ALSO 4. |
| | 6.5 FOR VERTICAL CLEARANCES. |
| | |
| | SHEET A2.01EGRESS FROM THE PARKING |
| | SPACES ON THE WEST SIDE RAMP DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH SBC 1004.1.3, COMMON PATH |
| | OFTRAVEL TO AND EXIT MUST BE 75' OR |
| | LESS.THE ROLL DOWN DOOR DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITHSBC 1012.1 AND THEREFORE IS |
| | NOT AN EXIT. REVISE AS NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | SHEET A2.02. HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED ON |
| | THE RAMP IN STAIR #1.SEE SBC 1013.6. |
| | |
| | SHEET A2.01.SBC 412.6.1 REQUIRES |
| | ELEVATOR LOBBIES FOR ALL ELEVATORS ON |
| | ALL FLOORS W/ CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS.THE |
| | GARAGE LEVELS, THE 4TH LEVEL SPA DECK |
| | ELEVATOR #1 AND THE SERVICE ELEVATOR |
| | WEST SIDE ON FLOORS 5 THROUGH 15 DO NOT |
| | QUALIFY FOR THE EXCEPTION.REVISE AS |
| | NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | THE INDIVIDUAL APARTMENTS MUST COMPLY |
| | WITH SBC 412.6.2, ACCESS TO AN EXIT |
| | WITHOUT TRAVEL THROUGH AN ELEVATOR |
| | LOBBY. |
| | |
| | STAIRS #1 AND #2 DO NOT MEET THE 1/2 |
| | DIAGONAL DISTANCE SEPARATION |
| | REQUIREMENT OF SBC 1004.1.4. ON ALL |
| | FLOORS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE |
| | SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL.PLEASE REVISE AS |
| | NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | SHEET A6.02 NOTES, CALLS FOR THE STAIRS |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE SFBC.PLEASE REVISE |
| | TO INCLUDE AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE 1997 SBC. |
| | |
| | SHEET A3.07 DOOR NOTES #3. UNDERCUTTING |
| | OF FIRE RATED DOORS MUST BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 80. |
| | |
| | SHOW A SPECIFIC CONNECTION DETAIL FOR |
| | THE PRECAST STONE DEPICTED ON SHEET |
| | 4.02 AND ELSEWHERE.IF THE DESIGN IS |
| | DELEGATED TO A SPECIALTY ENGINEER |
| | INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE, |
| | MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF THE FORCES |
| | TO BE RESISTED.SEE SBC 104.2. |
| | |
| | THE EIFS SHOWN IN DETAIL #50, SHEET |
| | A7.05 MUST COMPLY WITH SBC 1404.3 |
| | AND SBC APPENDIX F102.7.REVISE AS |
| | NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | SHEET A705 DETAIL 53.WHAT IS THE |
| | PARAPET HEIGHT THAT SERVES AS A |
| | GUARDRAIL?THE REFERENCE TO THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PAGES IS NOT CLEAR.SEE SBC |
| | 1015. |
| | |
| | SHEET A6.05.PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | THE GUARDRAIL AT THE WINDOW |
| | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH SBC |
| | 1608.2.3. |
| | |
| | GIVEN THE CITY'S REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT GLAZING, HOW |
| | WILL COMPLIANCE WITH SBC 1405 BE |
| | ACCOMPLISHED?PARTICULARLY, BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO, GARAGE |
| | LEVELS 2 AND 3. |
| | |
| | SHEET S18 CITES THE SFBC FOR DESIGN OF |
| | RAILS.DESIGN MUST BE TO SBC 1997 WITH |
| | SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA AND NOT A CODE |
| | SECTION.SEE SBC 104.2.1. |
| | |
| | SHEET S19 STRUCTURAL LOADS, DECLARES |
| | THAT THAT STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IS PER |
| | ASCE 7-95 AND THAT COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING IS BY WIND TUNNEL TESTING. |
| | ASCE 7-95 6.4.1.1 PROHIBITS THE MIXING |
| | OF THE METHODS ANALYSIS.IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THIS SITE IS SUBJECT TO UPWIND |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS, CHANNELING, BUFFETING, |
| | ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 6.4.2.1 |
| | LIMITATIONS OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE, |
| | THAT A COMPLETE WIND TUNNEL |
| | INVESTIGATION IS IN ORDER. |
| | |
| | SHOW THE DESIGN LOADS FOR THE WALKS |
| | ALONG THE ARC FORMED ON GRID LINE 4, |
| | SUBTENDED BY GRID LINE B, IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SBC 1604.9. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A NARRATIVE FOR THE METHODS OF |
| | TESTING REQUIRED BY SBC 412.1.2 FOR |
| | SMOKE REMOVAL AND STAIR PRESSURIZATION |
| | ON THE STANDBY POWER SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | SHEET E10 FIRE ALARM, DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| | APARTMENT UNIT SMOKE DETECTORS LINKED |
| | INTO THE SYSTEM AS PROVIDED FOR IN SBC |
| | 412.2.2 AND SBC 412.2.1 (5). |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH SBC |
| | 412.11 (5) IF THAT IS THE INTENDED |
| | OPTION OR COMPLY WITH SBC 1005.6. |
| | |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS |
| | AND APPEALS GRANTED TWO VARIANCES AT |
| | THEIR MAY 10, 2001 MEETING.ONE OF THE |
| | STIPULATIONS OF THE BOARD WAS THAT "THE |
| | SPRINKLER HEADS MEET THE RATING |
| | REQUIREMENTS"AND BE OF AN "EQUIVALENT |
| | ALTERNATE" PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | TESTING |
| | FROM A RECOGNIZED SOURCE THAT |
| | DEMONSTRATES COMPLIANCE WITH SBC |
| | 705.1.3 (NFPA 80) FOR THE SPRINKLERS. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS DEMONSTRATING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 411.4.2 FOR THE SIX AIR |
| | CHANGES PER HOUR IN THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | THE SP DRAWINGS SHOW A RISER/STANDPIPE |
| | IN A STAIR #3.WHAT IS THE INTENT OF |
| | THIS? |
