| Date |
Text |
| 2001-11-26 00:00:00 | TRUSSES |
| | DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) NO CONNECTOR IS INDICATED ON SHEET |
| | A-6 FOR TRUSS HJ7 (786# UPLIFT). THERE |
| | ARE SEVERAL OTHER HIP TRUSSES WITH NO |
| | CONNECTORS INDICATED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE TRUSS ENGINEER IS IMPROPERLY |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING COPIES OF ANOTHER |
| | ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS (ROOF VALLEY DETAIL, |
| | PIGGY-BACK CONNECTION DETAIL, LATERAL |
| | BRACE DETAIL, STANDARD FALSE BOTTOM |
| | DETAIL, ETC.) THE CRITERIA SITED IS ALSO |
| | INCORRECTLY GIVEN AS TPI-92 &SSBC-91. |
| | SHOULD BE TPI 1-95 AND SBC-97. |
| | |
| | 3) THE UPLIFT FOR TRUSS H1 (1608#) |
| | EXCEEDS THE CONNECTOR (TC-8, 1410#) |
| | DESIGN CAPACITY. |
| | |
| | 4) TRUSS H2 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 5) TRUSS H5 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 6) TRUSS T1 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE |
| | TRUSS LAYOUT FOR TRUSSES S8 THROUGH S11. |
| | |
| | 8) NO UPLIFT VALUES ARE LISTED ON THE |
| | TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR TRUSSES S4,S5,S6 AND |
| | S7. |
| | |
| | 9) TRUSS CJ6A EXCEEDS CAPACITY OF |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | 10) TRUSS M3 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 11) TRUSS M3A EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 12) TRUSS S14 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. |
| | |
| | 13) TRUSS SG1 (UPLIFT 6871#) EXCEEDS |
| | UPLIFT OF 4225# GIVEN ON SHEET A-6 FOR |
| | STEEL COLUMN. |
| | |
| | 14) MOST OF THE OTHER TRUSSES' UPLIFTS |
| | ALSO EXCEED THE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS |
| | LISTED CAPACITIES. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW ALL TRUSS CONNECTORS AND |
| | UPLIFT VALUES FOR ALL TRUSSES AND |
| | PROVIDE REVISED TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE |
| | AND/OR ROOF FRAMING PLAN (A-6). PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT WHEN TWO OR MORE CONNECTORS |
| | ARE LOCATED WITHIN 8" OF EACH OTHER IN |
| | A CONCRETE BEAM THE CAPACITY VALUES ARE |
| | REDUCED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)659-8096 EXT.8202 |
