| Date |
Text |
| 2001-10-19 00:00:00 | PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT # 01051204 |
| | 901 S OLIVE AV |
| | CONT: BRICE |
| | TEL: 719-3040 JEFF SOBLE |
| | FAX: 671-1986 |
| | |
| | SBC= 1997 STANDARD BUILDING CODE |
| | SBC*= STANDARD BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1)-SBC 104.2.2.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED, WE HAD REQUESTED THE SITE SUR |
| | VEY VARIFYING WHICH LOT FOR THE PROPOS- |
| | ED CHAPEL. THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILD- |
| | ING OWNED BY THE COLLEGE THAT ALL READY |
| | HAS THE ADDRESS OF 901 S. OLIVE. THE |
| | OLD (YWCA). THE CITY AS WELL AS THE |
| | COUNTY HAS LOT#74.43.43.27.30.000.0010 |
| | ADDRESSED AS 917 S OLIVE,NOT 901 SOUTH |
| | OLIVE WHICH IS MARKED ON THE BUILDING. |
| | THE LOT FOR THE CHAPEL IS IDENTIFIED |
| | AS74.43.43.27.25.000.0010. CITY & |
| | COUNTY DOES HAVE THE ADDRESS AS 901 |
| | S. OLIVE AVENUE. DOES THE COLLEGE WANT |
| | THE SAME ADDRESS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS, A |
| | UNITY OF TITLE WOULD BE REQUIRED. ANOTH |
| | ER SOLUTION TO THE SITUATION IS TO HAVE |
| | THE EXISTING (OLD YWCA) DO A ADDRESS |
| | CHANGE TO 917 S OLIVE. THE CITY WOULD |
| | REQUIRE A WRITTEN REQUEST SO THERE IS A |
| | RECORD OF A ADDRESS CHANGE RECORDED, |
| | FOR ALL EMEERGENCY AGENCIES, AS WELL AS |
| | UTITIES & THE POST OFFICE TO RECEIVE |
| | A CHANGE OF ADDRESS FROM THE CITY. |
| | |
| | 2)- THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: FL S.S.553/ |
| | CHAPTER 468 THE CITY IS IN RECEIPT OF |
| | THE THRESHOLD REPORT, THE THRESHOLD |
| | INSPECTOR THAT WILL ASSIGNED TO THE |
| | PROJECT HASN'T INTERVIEWED WITH THE |
| | ASSISTANT BUILDING OFF. DONALD NEELY. |
| | THIS IS A PREREQUISITE BEFORE ISSUANCE |
| | OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 3)- ONE OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE PRE- |
| | VIOUS PLAN REVIEW THAT YOU HAVE TRIED |
| | TO COMPLY WITH IS THE VELOCITY PRESS. |
| | FOR WINDOWS & DOORS, S-3. THE SYSTEMS |
| | ARE DESIGNED TO THE ASCE 7-98, WE HAVE |
| | NOT ADOPTED THE NEW FL. BUILDING CODE |
| | WHICH ASCE 7-98 IS TIED TO. WE HAVE |
| | BEEN GIVEN THE OK TO OK ( ASCE 7-95/ |
| | ASCE 7-98)THE PRESENTCODE RECOGNIZEZS |
| | THE CURRENT ASCE 7-95 AND SINCE ASCE |
| | 7-98 IS MORE STRINGENT IT MORE THAN |
| | MEETS THE PRESENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 4)- ITEM # 11 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | COMPONENTS & CLADDING, WINDOWS & DOORS |
| | CAN BE REMOVED FROM THE SCOPE OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT, GLAZED OPENINGS WILL |
| | NEED TO APPLY UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT |
| | WITH ASSOCIATED FEES. THEY WILL ALSO |
| | NEED TO COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 1606.4.1/ |
| | 1707.4.1 SBC AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGE PROJECTS, CITYS' |
| | OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION FOR THE IMPLE- |
| | MENTATION OF HURRICANE MISSLE IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 5)- ITEMS 16 & 17 FROM LAST REVIEW: |
| | PROVISO THAT THE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE |
| | PRECAST STONE PANELS & CAST STONE BANDS |
| | BE REVIEWED THE THE DESIGN PROFESSINALS |
| | & APPROVED BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILD |
| | ING DEPART. FOR PUBLIC RECORD. |
| | |
| | 6)- PLANS BE SUBMITTED TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR IMPACT |
| | FEES. |
| | |
| | 7)- AFTERPAYMENT TO COUNTY FOR THE |
| | IMPACT FEES CITY WILL ASSESS THE RADON |
| | FEES. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096 X 8412 |
