| Date |
Text |
| 2001-09-07 00:00:00 | PLAN REVIEW # 01051204 |
| | 901 S FLAGLER |
| | 74.43.43.27.25.000.0010. |
| | SCHWAB, TWITTY & HANSER |
| | TEL (561) 832-5599 |
| | FAX (561) 832- 4828 |
| | |
| | SBC = 1997 STANDARD BUILDING CODE |
| | SBC* = COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 |
| | STANDARD BUILDING CODE |
| | FL ACC CODE = FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE |
| | 1997 EDITION |
| | FL BLD CODE 2001 = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | 2001 EDITION/ ADOPTED JAN.1/2002 |
| | BUILDINGS THAT APPLY FOR A PERMIT |
| | AFTER DEC. 31, 2001WILL BE REVIEW |
| | ED UNDER THE 2002 CODE. |
| | |
| | 1)- SBC 104.2.2. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2)- CHAPTER 553 FL STATUTE, CHAPTER 468 |
| | & CHAPTER 7 CITY CODE. THIS BUILDING |
| | QUALIFIES AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, A |
| | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR WILL NEED TO REGIST- |
| | ER WITH ASST. BUILD. OFF. DON NEELY. THE |
| | ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPEC- |
| | IAL INSPECTOR TO PREFORM STTRUCTURAL IN- |
| | SPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSU- |
| | ANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PRE- |
| | PARED BY THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE |
| | ENFORCEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A |
| | BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | A THRESHOLD BUILDING. TTHE PURPOSE OF |
| | THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO |
| | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES & |
| | SCHEDULES SO THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE |
| | ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR THE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3)- SBC 104.2.2. ADD INFORMATION RE- |
| | QUESTED, FL ACC CODE SS.503.505 CHAP |
| | 97-76. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUEST A |
| | LETTER FROM PALM BEACH ATLANTIC COLLEGE |
| | INDICATING THE " USAGE OF THE CHAPEL". |
| | THE STATE STATUTES INDICATE THAT BUILD- |
| | INGS INTENDED FOR THE CONGREGATION TO |
| | GATHER FOR THE PREFORMANCE OF RELIGIOUS |
| | CEREMONIES, ARE EXEMPT FROM ACCESSIBIL- |
| | ITIY REQUIREMENTS, (VERTICAL ACCESSIBIL- |
| | ITY). THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE PLANS |
| | (A.2.1) INDICATE THAT THE SEATS WILL BE |
| | REMOVAL BY OWNER ALLOWING FOR VARIOUS |
| | EVENTS TO TAKE PLACE IN THIS BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4)- CHAPEL SQ. FT.= 4362 SQ FT @ 7 SQ FT |
| | NER PERSON + OCCUPANT LOAD OF 624 PEOPLE |
| | THIS OCCUPANT LOAD QUALIFIIES THIS BUILD |
| | ING AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5)- ARCH. PLANS A.1.2. CODE REVIEW STATE |
| | MENT INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS A |
| | TYPE V FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING,UNPRO- |
| | TECTED, WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGTH OF 55'-0. |
| | THE MEAN ROOF HEIGTH, SHEET A.3.5. GIVEN |
| | THE BEAM @ THE UPPER ROOF LINE IS 56'-0" |
| | AND SCALING THE CENTERLINE OF THE TRUSS |
| | A HEIGTH OF 8'-6" IS DERIVED, 1/2 THIS |
| | HEIGTH OR 4'-3" PLUS THE BEAM HEIGTH OF |
| | 56'-0" GIVES US THE MEAN ROOF HEIGTH OF |
| | 60'-3". THIS BY TABLE 500 A-2 SMALL |
| | ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO BE A 1-HR PROTECT |
| | ED TO QUALIFY FOR THE ADDITIONAL FOOTAGE |
| | THIS MEAN ROOF HEIGTH COULD GO TO A |
| | HEIGTH OF 65'-0". THIS ALSO REFLECTS IN |
| | TABLE 600 AS TO THE STRUCTURAL MEMBRS |
| | AN THE RATING REQUIRED UNDER TABLE 600. |
| | |
| | 6)- SHEET A.2.1 NOTE MOVABLE SEATS BY |
| | OWNER, SBC 1019.10.1.4. SEATS SHALL BE |
| | FASTENED TO THE FLOOR IN ALL ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCIES WITH OCCUPANT LOADS GREATER |
| | THAN 200. |
| | |
| | 7)- SHEET A.2.1. DOOR 117 C THE PLANS |
| | ARE NOT CLEAR IF THERE IS A STEP AT THE |
| | EXTERIOR? SBC 1013.1 RAMPS ARE TO BE |
| | USED WHEN THE DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION IS |
| | 12 INCHES OR LESS. |
| | |
| | 8)-MISSING INFORMATION FROM SBC TABLE |
| | 803.3. MINIMUM INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIF-I |
| | CATION. |
| | |
| | 9)- MISSING SOILS REPORT, MINIMUM BEAR- |
| | ING VALUE, SBC * 1804.2 |
| | |
| | 10)- INDICATE THE VELOCITY PRESSURES FOR |
| | WINDOWS & DOORS, INCLUDE INTERIOR AND |
| | END ZONE PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 11)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | A)- WINDOW & DOOR BUCK ATTACHMENT |
| | B)- PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL GLAZED |
| | OPENINGS, SBC 1606.4.1./ 1707.4.1*. |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS WILL REQUIRE LARGE MIS- |
| | SLE IMPACT RESISTANT GLAZING. STANDARDS |
| | FOR WINDBORNE DEBRIS IMPACT TEST |
| | SSTD-12-97/ CITY INTERPITTATION. |
| | C)- DOORS WILL ALSO REQUIRE PRODUCT TEST |
| | ING (EXTERIOR) SBCCI OR DADE COUNTY RE- |
| | PORTS ARE ACCEPTED. |
| | |
| | 12)- SBC1503.3.2 ROOFING SYSSTEMS SHALL |
| | BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE APPROPRIATE |
| | WINDLOADS. THE NAILING DETAIL PROVIDED |
| | ON SHEET S-3 INDICATES NAILING REQUIRE- |
| | MENTS FOR LESS THAN 25'.THE COUNTY AMEND |
| | MENTS GIVES NAILING PATERNS TO 35'.ABOVE |
| | THIS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WILL HAVE |
| | TO GIVE THE PATTERN & TYPE OF FASTENER. |
| | FOR THE STEEL DECK AS WELL AS THE PLY- |
| | WOOD FASTENED TO THE STEEL DECKING. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEMSTHAT |
| | WILL BE APPLIED AS THE FINISH ROOF. |
| | |
| | 13)- FIRE DISTRICT SBC F102.2: ROOF |
| | COVERINGS IN A FIRE DISTRICT SHALL CON- |
| | FORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF A CLASS |
| | "A" OR "B" ROOF. |
| | |
| | 14)- FIRE DISTRICT ; F102.2 11 PLASTIC |
| | VENEERS NOT PERMITED IN A FIRE DISTRICT |
| | SBC 103.7 ALTERNATE MATERIALS & METHODS |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 15)- SHEET A-6.3 SECTION DETAIL #3 INDI- |
| | CATES A HORIZONTAL STEEL BEAM OF TUBE |
| | STEEL WITH SOME TYPE OF MATERIAL BELOW |
| | THAT IS NOT INDICATED? TYPE V BUILDING! |
| | |
| | 16)- THIS SAME UPPER ROOF DETAIL DOESN'T |
| | SHOW UP ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS |
| | S-3 NOR S-4, ELE.56"-0".? |
| | |
| | 17)- SHEET A6.6 DETAILS 1,3&7 DEPICT |
| | CAST STONE BANDING. SBC 1403.2.7 ATTACH- |
| | MENT |
| | |
| | 18)- SHEET A.3.9. DETAIL #2 PRECAST PAN- |
| | ELS, ATTACHMENT PER SBC 1403.2.6. |
| | |
| | 19)- M2.1 DEPICTS DUCTS UNDER THE FLOOR |
| | AT PLATFORM LEVEL. S-1 DETAILS 5&6 TUN- |
| | NEL FOR DUCT RUNS, DETAIL #6 INDICATES |
| | A 12"X10" DUCT(BRANCH) THE MAIN TRUNK |
| | LINE IS AS BIG AS 24"X18" WILL THE TUN- |
| | NEL INDICATES THAT IT IS 2'-0" WIDE WILL |
| | IT BE WIDER? ALSO THE HEIGTH OF THE |
| | BUILDING FOUNDATION IS NOT INDICATED ON |
| | THE PLANS SHOULD IT BE DEEPER TO ACCOM- |
| | IDATE THE DUCT & TUNNEL? |
| | |
| | 20)- FL ENERGY CODE CALCULATIONS |
| | |
| | 21)- COUNTY IMPACT FEES TO BE PAID, |
| | CHECK FOR CREDITS BUILDING THAT WAS |
| | DEMOLISHED! |
| | |
| | 22RADON FEES / $77.02 TO CITY |
| | |
| | PLEASE RESPOND WITH A WRITTEN STATEMENT |
| | TO WHERE I CAN FIND THE ADDITIONAL INFOR |
| | MATION, THIS WILL SPEED UP THE PLAN RE- |
| | RIEW PROCESSTHANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR |
| | HELP IN THESE MATTERS. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096X 8412 |
