| Date |
Text |
| 2002-10-01 00:00:00 | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL INFOR- |
| | MATION SUBMITTED IS VERY CONFUSING: |
| | A)DOCUMENTS ARE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED |
| | BY DIFFERENT ENGINEERS. |
| | WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT? |
| | B)ENGINEERS' INFORMATION IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | MISSING INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | C)DON ARPIN IS AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER? |
| | SEE SUBMITTAL. |
| | D)SOME DOCUMENTS/DRAWINGS HAVE NOT ORIGI |
| | NAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER |
| | 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | E)SOME DOCUMENTS/DWGS HAVE THE INFORMATI |
| | ON FOR ONE ENGINEER, BUT IS SIGNED BY |
| | OTHER ENGINEER. WHY. |
| | F)SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION DON'T HAVE |
| | THE ADDRESS OF THE JOB. CHECK THEM ALL |
| | G)PRODUCT APPROVALS DON'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | SEE SIZES AND TYPES SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | H)DON ARPIN ENGINEER'S COVER LETTER IS |
| | NOT SPECIFIC AS TO WHAT IS BEING |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY HIM. |
| | I)GARAGE DOORS DON'T MATCH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AND THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT |
| | SETS OF DRAWINGS. THERE IS ANOTHER ENG |
| | INEER. THERE IS NOT FILLED FORM FOR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC INSTALLATION SIGNED BY |
| | BOTH PROFESSIONALS. |
| | J)CUSTOM GLAZING PROTECTION DEVICES WITH |
| | OUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NEED TO PROVI |
| | DE THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE |
| | METHOD AND INSTALLATION AFFIDAVIT. |
| | SEE CITY IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR |
| | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION |
| | ATTACHED. |
