| Date |
Text |
| 2001-04-27 00:00:00 | REVISION : 4/20/01 |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | |
| | 1)- AS PART OF THE PROVISO THIS AREA |
| | WAS THE SECOND OF (2) AREAS NOT COVERED |
| | UNDER THE INTERIOR BUILD OUT PERMIT. |
| | THIS AREA WOULD REQUIRE A SEPERATE |
| | PERMIT AND FEES. SEE THE ORIGINAL PRO- |
| | VISO ATTACHED TO THE STAMPED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2)- DESCRIPENCY: THE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | DECLAIRS THAT A NITROGEN TANK IS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED WHEREAS THE PLANS DEPICTS A |
| | OXYGEN TANK? IF OXYGEN, IS THIS COMPRESS |
| | ED OXYGEN OR REFRIGARATED LIQUID OXYGEN |
| | |
| | 3)- THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THE |
| | SIZE OF THE TANK?TYPE OF TANK? OR |
| | HOW THE TANK WILL BE FASTENED TO THE |
| | SLAB TO RESIST OVERTURNING IN A HURRI- |
| | CANE? IS THERE A FASTY FACTOR FIGURED IN |
| | TO THIS FORMULA? THE PIPING AND SAFETY |
| | VALVES ARE TO BE UNDER A MED-GAS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 4)- THIS AREA IS NEXT TO A PROPOSED |
| | SCREENED IN COVER, WHAT IS THIS AREA TO |
| | BE USED FOR? IF THE TANK IS COMPRESSED |
| | NITROGEN WHAT SAFETY FEATURES ARE TO |
| | BE CONSIDERED FOR GAS LEAKS, THE CONCERN |
| | SIMPLE ASPHYXIATION. |
| | |
| | 5)- NO INFORMATION ON WARNING SIGNS NOR |
| | LABELS IDENTIFYING THE TYPE OF HAZARD OR |
| | TYPE OF MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 6)- THE INTERIOR BUILDOUT HAD THESE |
| | DOORS AS EXIT DOORS, SHOW THE PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL, TYPE OF MATERIALS THIS COVER |
| | WILL BE MADE OF, WALLS & ROOF? |
| | |
| | 8)- A SITE PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW |
| | THE RELAVENCE TO THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE. |
| | |
| | 9)- THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE AND ASSUMED |
| | METAL ROOF WILL REQUIRE A SEPERATE |
| | PERMIT, WILL THIS ROOF HAVE A FOAM INSUL |
| | ATION CORE? METAL STRUCTURES ALSO |
| | REQUIRES ENGINEERING, SIGNED SEALED & |
| | DATED. |
| | |
| | 10)- IF THE TANK DEPICTED IS TO BE |
| | OXYGEN CHECK MSDS SHEETS FOR THE CLOSE- |
| | NESS TO FLAMMABLES OR THE BARRICADE OF |
| | NON-COMBUSTIBLES. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096 EX 8412 |
