| Date |
Text |
| 2001-02-09 00:00:00 | SECOND PAID PLAN REVIEW. |
| | 1.THE CODE ANALYSIS ON SHEET G1.01 IS |
| | INCORRECT.TYPE II CONSTRUCTION BY ITS |
| | DEFINITION IS PROTECTED.SEE SBC 604. |
| | 2.THE STATED FIRE RATINGS ARE INCORRECT. |
| | SEE SBC TABLE 600. THE STATED HEIGHT |
| | AND AREA ARE INCORRECT.SEE SBC TABLE |
| | 500. |
| | 3. THE GLASS DOOR BETWEEN THE LOBBY AND |
| | THE GARAGE IS REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RATED. |
| | A ROLLING SHUTTER SYSTEM IS NOT AN |
| | ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE FOR A MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS.SEE SBC 1012.4 #5 AND SBC |
| | 1012.1. |
| | 4. SHEET A27.6DESIGNATE THE SPECIFIC |
| | SIZING OF THE ELEVATOR SHAFT VENT.SEE |
| | SBC 3003.6 AND SBC 3001.1. |
| | 5.SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION DETIALS ARE |
| | NECESSARY FOR THE SUSPENDED STUCCO |
| | CEILING AND THE SUSPENDED FRAMING SHOWN |
| | ON SHEETS A6.01 AND A6.22 RESPECTIVELY. |
| | SEE SBC 104.2.1. |
| | 6.THE STATEMENT ON SHEET A75.1 |
| | "GLAZING SYSTEM TO MEET LOCAL CODE" IS |
| | NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE FOR |
| | SPECIFIC DESIGN INFORMATION.SEE THE |
| | ATTACHED POLICY AND PROCEDURE STATEMENT. |
| | 7.THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S1.01 SHOWS |
| | OPENINGS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION THAT |
| | ARE NOT ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. |
| | THE #2 STAIRS HAVE NOT BEEN REVISED ON |
| | THE STRUCTURAL PLANS. |
| | 8.SHEET S7.01 DESIGN PARAMETERS CITE A |
| | BUILDING LESS THAN 60' IN HEIGHT.THIS |
| | BUILDING IS MORE TAHN 60' IN HEIGHT. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | ACCORDING AND DEMOMSTRATE THE CHANGES. |
| | 9.SHEET A1.01.WHAT IS THE MEANING OF |
| | THE STATEMENT "DELUGE ENTRY SYSTEM |
| | W/SPRINKLER HEAD ON EACH SIDE @ 4' |
| | O.C."? |
| | 10.THE ATRIUM.HOW DOES THE 5600 CFM |
| | FAN PROVIDE AN EXHAUST CAPACITY OF |
| | 40,000 CFM AS REQUIRED BY SBC 414.4? |
| | WHERE DOES THE MAKEUP AIR COME FROM? |
| | HOW IS THE OTHER SPACE VENTING |
| | REQUIREMENT OF SBC 412.5 ACCOMPLISHED? |
| | 11.SHEET AC1.O1.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN TO LOCATE |
| | THE BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY. |
| | 12.SHEET A5.01.THE NOTE SAYS "OPEN |
| | AREA CALCULATED BASED ON SBC 411.3.2." |
| | WHICH METHOD WAS USED?! OR 2?THE |
| | NOTES "51% OPEN" IMPLIES METHOD 1 WHICH |
| | REQUIRES OPEN AREA FOR THE FULL LENGTH |
| | OF THE SIDE.THE PORTION BETWEEN GRID |
| | LINES C AND E ON THE REAR ELEVATION AND |
| | 3 AND 4 ON THE RIGHT ELEVATION DO NOT |
| | APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH THIS.PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING HOW THIS |
| | AREA OF THE CODE WILL BE COMPLIED WITH. |
| | SEE ALSO THE NOTES ON THE FIRST REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS RE IMPACT FEES, THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING, ZONING, ETC. |
| | |
| | HAROLD PISKURA |
| | (561) 659-8096 X 8219 |
