| Date |
Text |
| 2001-05-22 00:00:00 | TRUSS DRAWINGS SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | |
| | 1-TRUSS LAYOUT AND ENGINEERED TRUSSES: |
| | A)WHO IS THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | THE LAYOUT? MISSING INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FL. STATUTES. |
| | (NO DONE FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLIST). |
| | |
| | B)WHY IS THERE ANOTHER ENGINEER SIGNING |
| | AND SEALING THE ENGINEERED TRUSSES? |
| | C)WHY IS THERE ANOTHER ENGINEER SIGNING |
| | AND SEALING THE PARALLAM BEAM? |
| | D)WHERE IS TRUSS FGA ON TRUSS LAYOUT? |
| | E)ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURE ON TRUSS FGA AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 OF FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | F)UPDATE DESIGN CRITERIA ON TRUSS |
| | LAYOUT AS REQUIRED: ASCE 7-95 145MPH |
| | (NO DONE FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLIST). |
| | |
| | 2-ARCHITECT TO REVIEW ALL TRUSS DRAWINGS |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | -USE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP TO IDENTIFY |
| | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 3-ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE THAT IS CLEARLY KEYED TO THE |
| | FRAMING PLANS.INFORMATION SUBMITTED |
| | IS VERY CONFUSING AND IS NOT CLEAR |
| | WHERE IT APPLIES TO. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS VERY |
| | CONFUSING & RAISES MORE QUESTIONS |
| | THAN ANSWERS. IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS CONCERNING MY COMMENTS, |
| | PLEASE CALL JULIO GOMEZ AT |
| | 659-8096 EXT. 8232. |
