| Date |
Text |
| 2001-01-08 00:00:00 | APPROVED WITH PROVISO: |
| | 1-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ENTRY |
| | DOORS, FRENCH DOOR AT MASTER SUITE. |
| | -DRAWINGS IN PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | FRENCH DOOR AT MASTER SUITE ARE NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. |
| | 2-STORM PANELS: |
| | PROVIDE A COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHED. |
| | AS PER CITY SAMPLE ATTACHED. |
| | -PANELS #13 AND #14 EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | SPAN OF 12'-4". |
| | -SHEET 4 OF 5: CLEARLY INDICATE ANCHORS |
| | AND SPACING TO BE USED ACCORDING TO |
| | THE STRUCTURE TYPE, CONNECTION TYPE |
| | AND DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | -SHEET 3 OF 5: DESIGN PRESSURE ARE |
| | MARKED INCORRECTLY. SEE ARCHITECT'S |
| | PLANS FOR CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | 3-CLARIFY WHO IS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD. THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION |
| | FOR BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE FORM |
| | IS SIGNED BY AN ENGINEER, BUT THIS |
| | ENGINEER DIDN'T SIGN, SEAL AND DATE |
| | THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. |
| | 4-THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES IS NOT THE |
| | SAME AS THE ONE SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR BUILDING CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORM. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS TAKEN FROM |
| | GRADE, NOT FROM FINISH FLOOR, TO THE |
| | AVERAGE POINT OF THE HIGHEST ROOF. |
