Plan Review Details - Permit 99121910
Plan Review Stops For Permit 99121910
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2001-01-16 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2001-01-16 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2001-01-16 Time 12:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2000-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2000-05-15 Time 13:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2000-05-15 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2000-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2000-02-22 Time 06:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2000-02-22 Time 06:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2000-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By cthirben Date 2000-05-02 Time 14:59 Rev Time 1.00
Received By cthirben Date 2000-05-02 Time 14:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2000-03-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2000-03-01 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.35
Received By jgomez Date 2000-03-01 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-A/C PLANS WERE NOT UPDATED. PLANS
 DON'T MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-01-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2000-01-28 Time 13:47 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jleech Date 2000-01-28 Time 13:47 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00DENIED;
 1. A/C PLAN TO BE SAME AS BUILDING FLOOR
 PLAN.
 2. CFM CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE LESS THAN
 A/H'S CAPACITY OR LARGER EQUIPMENT
 SHOULD BE USED.

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2000-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-05-17 Time 06:22 Rev Time 0.50
Received By tlarge Date 2000-05-17 Time 06:22 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00SAME COMMENTS AS PREVIOUS REVIEW.

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2000-05-04 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-05-04 Time 17:32 Rev Time 0.75
Received By tlarge Date 2000-05-04 Time 17:32 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00SHT.1-MAX.HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF WOOD
 BLOCKING FOR SIDE OF TOILET SHALL BE 32"
 (PLANS SHOW 32"MIN.)PER FHA REQ.6,FIG.#3
  
 SUPPLY WOOD BLOCKING DETAILS FOR SHOWER.
 COMPLY W/FHA REQ.#6,FIG.#5.
  
 CLEARLY INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH
 DESIGN SPECIFICATION (A OR B) OF THE
 FAIR HOUSING ACT IS BEING UTILIZED.
  
 BATHROOM #2,UNIT MDL-1409,THE LENGTH OF
 THE BATHROOM DOESN'T HAVE THE DIMENSION
 REQUIRED FOR TYPE "A"BATH WHEN
 APPROACHED FROM THE BEDROOM.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE PLUMBING FIXTURES ON
 THE SANITARY RISERS DOESN'T CORRELATE
 WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN.
 COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS TO SPC SEC.104.2.1

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-01-27 Time 06:21 Rev Time 0.65
Received By tlarge Date 2000-01-27 Time 06:18 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00A 30"X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHALL BE
 RPOVIDED PARALLEL TO THE SHOWER PER
 FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING ACT 24 CFR 100.205
 REQ.#7,PARAGRAPH (2)(A).THE WATER CLOSET
 CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THIS SPACE PER
 SPECIFICATION "A"OF THE ACT.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE FIXTURES ON THE
 SANITARY RISER DOESN'T CORRELATE W/THE
 ARCH.FLOOR PLAN.COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS TO
 SPC SEC.104.2.1.
  
 SHOW MAX.HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF WOOD
 BLOCKING FOR GRAB BARS.COMPLY W/FHA REQ.
 #6.

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2000-05-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2000-05-10 Time 21:05 Rev Time 2.50
Received By jgomez Date 2000-05-10 Time 21:04 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1-FLOOD ZONE "AO". PROVIDE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE AFTER SLAB IS POURED.
 2-PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 -PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TWO HOUR
 FIRE RATED CONCRETE BLOCK, EXTERIOR
 FRENCH DOOR WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY,
 EXTERIOR DOUBLE FRENCH DOOR, WINDOW
 MULLIONS.
 -DRAWINGS IN PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS ARE NOT LEGIBLE.
 3-PROVIDE BUCK DETAIL FOR SLIDING GLASS
 DOORS. SEC 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 4-PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG
 WINDOWS REQUIRES A 2X BUCK.REVISE
 WINDOW BUCK DETAIL AS REQUIRED.
 5-STORM PANELS:
 -INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN
 DON'T MATCH ARCHITECT'S LAYOUT. SEE
 SIZES OF OPENINGS. ALSO, INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL
 THE OPTIONS SHOWN IN ARCHITECT'S PLANS
 -CLEARLY INDICATE ON DRAWINGS MOUNTING
 CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING
 NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION TABLES
 ON SHEET 4 OF 4 OF DRAWING 97-404P AND
 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHT FOR THIS BUILDING IS PLUS OR
 MINUS AT 16'-0" AND THE BUILDING
 CONSTRUCTION IS REINFORCED MASONRY
 NOT CONCRETE.
 6-REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 -OWNER'S INFORMATION IS INCORRECT.
 -LOCATION OF BUILDING IS NOT IN BOYNTON
 -DON'T FORGET TO ASK OWNER TO SIGN AND
 DATE FORM AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE.
 7-PROVIDE COMPLETE CALCULATIONS FOR
 ATTIC CROSS VENTILATION AT EACH UNIT
 AND CLEARLY INDICATE ON ROOF PLAN THE
 VENTS SIZES AND LOCATION. 2309.7 SBC.
 8-PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECS FOR
 CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT ENTRY AND BACK
 PORCH. INCLUDE FASTENER TYPE AND
 SPACING. SEC 2504 SBC 1997.
 9-WALK-IN-CLOSET IN UNITS 1527 TO HAVE
 THE SHELF ONLY (NO ROD) ON EITHER SIDE
 IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE CLEARANCES
 ON THE FAIR HOUSING ACT, CHAPTER THREE

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-03-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2000-03-24 Time 08:56 Rev Time 4.50
Received By jgomez Date 2000-03-24 Time 08:56 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-REVISE LOCATION OF KITCHEN RANGE TO
 COMPLY WITH THE CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED
 IN FRONT OF IT. SEESECTION 7A OF
 FAIR HOUSING ACT.
 2-BATHROOM #2 AT UNIT MDL 1409 DOESN'T
 COMPLY WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT SEC. 7B:
 A)DOOR FROM BEDROOM #2 TO HAVE 32" MIN.
 CLEAR OPENING.
 B)LENGTH OF BATHROOM DOESN'T HAVE THE
 DIMENSION REQUIRED FOR A TYPE A BATH
 WHEN APPROACHED FROM THE BEDROOM.
 3-SHOWER AT MASTER BATH TO COMPLY WITH
 THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED. SEE
 FAIR HOUSING ACT SEC 7B.
 4-OPTIONAL SLIDING GLASS DOORS AT MASTER
 BEDROOM TO HAVE 32" MIN. CLEAR OPENING
 5-ENTRY DOOR SPACE TO COMPLY W/ANSI 4.13
 6-ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND TRUSS DRAWINGS:
 -CLARIFY CONSTRUCTION AT RIGHT AND LEFT
 ENDS OF BUILDING. TRUSS DRAWINGS SHOW
 BEARING WALLS, BUT ARCHITECTURAL DWGS
 DON'T. SEE PLANS FOR COMMENTS.
 -CLARIFY WHO REVIEW THE TRUSS DRAWINGS.
 STAMP SAYS "OUR OFFICE HAS REVIEW..."
 WHAT OFFICE IS THIS?
 -SEE TRUSS LAYOUT FOR MORE COMMENTS.
 -CLARIFY WHY THE MAIN TRUSSES RUNNING
 FROM FRONT TO BACK ARE DESIGNED
 WITHOUT THE RIDGE LINE. WHY IS THIS
 AREA TO BE DONE BY BUILDER?.
 -REVISE ENGINEERED TRUSSES SO THAT THEY
 CLEARLY MATCH THE ROOF TRUSS LAYOUT.
 -UPDATE ALL GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS. ASCE
 7-95 AND SEAL (RAISED SEAL), DATE AND
 SIGN THEM.
 -ENGINEERED TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED AS
 PER ASCE 7-95 FOR 145 MPH WIND, NOT AS
 ASCE 7-93 FOR 140 MPH WIND. ALSO ALL
 TRUSSES TO BE DESIGN AT THE SAME MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT.
 -REVISE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE TO RESIST
 THE UPLIFT AND LATERAL LOADS SHOWN ON
 THE ENGINEERED TRUSSES.
 7-PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 -PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 2 HOUR
 CONCRETE BLOCK.
 -SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND WINDOW PRODUCT
 APPROVAL TO BE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATE
 BY THE PROFESSIONAL DESIGNER OF RECORD
 AND FILL IN THE SPECIFIC JOB LOCATION.
 8-STORM PANELS:
 -PROVIDE A COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHED.
 (AS PER CITY SAMPLE) AND KEY PLAN.
 ALSO, HIGHLIGHT SPECIFIC MOUNTING
 CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR SPACING.
 9-ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE SIGNED AND
 DATED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. ALSO, REVISE
 THE OWNER INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM.
 -# OF BEDROOMS ON UNIT 1527 IS 3, NOT
 2. SEE FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED
 10-PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ATTIC CROSS
 VENTILATION AT EACH UNIT.SBC/97 2309.7
 NOTE: TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FIREPROOF DET.
 ON WALL SECTION 1 OF SHEET DT.
 11-PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECS FOR
 CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT FRONT AND BACK
 PORCHES OF EACH UNIT. INCLUDE FASTENER
 TYPE AND SPACING. SECTION 2504 SBC/97.
 12- DRAWING #4:CLARIFY HOW DOES THE 2 HR
 "PARTY WALL" GOES TO THE BOTTOM OF
 ROOF SHEATHING IF THE BEAM HEIGHT IS
 12'-11". SEE SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS.
 13-DETAIL SC-2: HOW DOES THIS DESIGN
 MAINTAINS THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND
 FIRE RESISTANCE IF THE MAIN GIRDER
 FAILS. SEC. 704.4.2(3) SBC 1997.
 14-NEED TO HAVE A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
 EACH TOWNHOUSE.
 NOTE: NO NEED FOR INDIVIDUAL DRAWINGS.
 2 SETS SUBMITTED FOR ENTIRE BUILDING.
 15-PAY $750 TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BCH
 FOR WESTERN EXPANSION FEES FOR EACH
 TOWNHOUSE.
 16-CONSTRUCTION VALUATION DECLARED IN
 THE APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. THE
 CALCULATED VALUE FOR EACH TOWNHOUSE IS
 AS FOLLOWS:
 $107,877 FOR MODEL 1409 AND
 $115,660 FOR MODEL 1527. THEREFORE,
 PERMIT FEES WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED
 FOR EACH PERMIT APPLICATION.
 17-PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS AT AREAS MARKED
 ON PLANS. SECTION 2405.2 SBC 1997.
 18-SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MARKED ON THE
 PLANS AND PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET
 AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE DONE ON ORIGINAL
 DRAWINGS IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE
 REVIEW PROCESS.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2000-05-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2000-05-31 Time 11:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved