| 2023-03-30 10:58:27 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF BOTH SPACES AND THE INTENT OF THE |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12.1 THE AHJ SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE OCCUPANCY DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF NUMBER OF EXITS AND TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCES IN COMPLINACE WITH THE OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION NOTED IN # 1. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12.6 PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE AHJ PRIOR TO |
| | THE ALTERATION OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS OR FIRE |
| | PROTECTION SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN INDICATING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH APPLICABLE CODE WITHIN NFPA 101. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED OPENING IS WITHIN A |
| | FIRE RATED SEPARATION, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INDICATION |
| | OF THE NUMERICAL CALL OUT FOR THE # 1 TYP WALL TYPE |
| | THOUGH ITS A CMU. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12.1 THE AHJ SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | IF IT IS A REUIRED FIRE RATED SEPARATION THE OPENING IS |
| | REQUIRED TO HAVE THE SAME FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE WALL TYPE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
