|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 22100159
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 22100159 |
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cwalker |
Date |
2022-10-11 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cwalker |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-11 12:13:20 | FIRE PROVISO COMMENT: | | | | | | IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED, NOT REQUIRED, THAT A KNOX | | | PADLOCK BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW 24-HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS | | | FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THE KNOX PADLOCK CAN BE USED IN COMBINATION WITH THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PADLOCK FOR ACCESS AND SECURITY AFTER AN | | | INCIDENT. | | | | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT KNOX PADLOCKS CAN BE | | | PURCHASED AT HTTS://WWW.KNOXBOX.COM/ | | | | | | C. WALKER | | | | | | 561-804-4762 | | | | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
Time |
17:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-10-07 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
Time |
09:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-25 09:19:07 | 10/25/22 ??? PASSED | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE WITHIN THE | | | REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT | | | ALLOWANCE OF 48 INCHES (4 FEET) ACCORDING TO THE | | | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1). THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | REVISED ???TEMPORARY FENCE PLAN??? THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES THIS SEGMENT OF THE | | | PROPOSED FENCE NOT EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT | | | ALLOWED. [SATISFIED] | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED ???TEMPORARY FENCE PLAN??? | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED FENCE | | | IS NOT OBSCURING VISIBILITY AT THE ROAD INTERSECTIONS | | | (VISIBILITY TRIANGLE). [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-10-18 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-18 11:56:29 | 10/18/22 ??? FAILED | | | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE WITHIN THE | | | REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT | | | ALLOWANCE OF 48 INCHES (4 FEET) ACCORDING TO THE | | | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1). THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | REVISED ???TEMPORARY FENCE PLAN??? THAT | | | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES THIS SEGMENT OF THE | | | PROPOSED FENCE NOT EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT | | | ALLOWED. | | | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED ???TEMPORARY FENCE PLAN??? | | | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED FENCE | | | IS NOT OBSCURING VISIBILITY AT THE ROAD INTERSECTIONS | | | (VISIBILITY TRIANGLE). | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
