| Plan Review Stops For Permit 22081416 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
Time |
18:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
Time |
18:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-28 15:48:59 | FBC107 SCOPE NOT CLEAR. IS THIS A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE? | | | REVISE APPLICATION TO INCLUDE IN WORK DESCRIPTION. | | | WHERE WILL THE FENCE BE INSTALLED? I AM UNABLE TO | | | LOCATE THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED FENCE ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2023-02-08 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2023-02-08 |
Time |
09:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-10-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-10-17 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-17 11:19:49 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) THERE IS NO SPECIFIC INDICATION OF WHERE THE FENCE | | | WILL BE LOCATED ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD, PLEASE PROVIDE THEPROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF THE FENCE. | | | | | | | | | 1A) THERE ARE NO LOCATIONS OF ANY GATE ACCESS POINTS OR | | | GATE WIDTHS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE GATE LOCATIONS AND WIDTH DETAIL THAT | | | WILL PROVIDE FOR FD EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 1B) IT IS RECOMMENDED, NOT REQUIRED, FOR THE GATES BE | | | PROVIDED WITH KNOX PADLOCKS. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
Time |
18:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2023-04-26 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2023-02-07 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-10-17 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-08-30 |
Time |
07:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jbjoseph |
Date |
2023-02-28 |
Time |
14:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jbjoseph |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-28 14:52:09 | PLEASE IDENTIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE CHAIN LINK ON | | | THE SURVEY OR THE SITE PLAN | | | | | | BRUCELY A. JOSEPH | | | PW PROGRAM MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
Time |
18:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2023-05-29 |
Time |
18:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2023-05-19 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2023-05-19 |
Time |
09:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2023-02-21 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2023-02-21 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-21 14:40:57 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY THAT WAS UPLOADED WITH | | | THE PERMIT DOES NOT COVER THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED | | | FENCE. IT APPEARS TO BE THE SHEET NORTH OF THE AREA OF | | | WORK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SURVEY FOR THE LOCATION OF THE | | | PROPOSED FENCE. STAFF NEEDS THIS TO VERIFY THE LOCATION | | | OF THE EXISTING ENCLOSURE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE | | | EXISTING ENCLOSURE AND SPECIFICALLY THAT THE REQUIRED | | | 50-FOOT LONG LOADING SPACE IS MAINTAINED AT THE FRONT | | | OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE OPENING. IT APPEARS FROM THE | | | INFORMATION PROVIDED THAT THE BELLSOUTH EASEMENT IS NOT | | | WITHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK. | | | | | | 2) THE PROPOSED FENCE IS TO ENCLOSE BOTH A PROPOSED | | | GENERATOR AND AN EXISTING DUMPSTER. THE CITY'S ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE | | | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY | | | DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL (NOTE: A FREESTANDING PVC FENCE | | | IS PERMITTED). IT APPEARS THE ENTIRE FENCE IS PROPOSED | | | TO USE A WINDSCREEN, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED FOR | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. ADDITIONALLY, THE SIZE OF THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT CONFORM TO MINIMUM CITY | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | 3) THE RECENTLY UPLOADED PLANS ARE POOR QUALITY AND | | | STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY MANY OF THE DETAILS, TO | | | INCLUDE HOW THE GENERATOR SCREENING IS BEING ADDRESSED. | | | PROVIDE CLEAR PLANS. | | | | | | 4) THE GENERATOR IS REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED BUT IS NOT | | | SUBJECT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS THE DUMPSTER, OTHER | | | THAN SLATS IN THE CHAIN LINK ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 5) THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE MATERIAL AND | | | DIMENSIONS FOR EACH SECTION OF FENCE. ANY CHANGE IN THE | | | VALUE OF THE PERMIT TO COMPLY WITH THE CHANGE IN | | | MATERIAL FOR THE CODE COMPLIANT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MUST | | | BE UPDATED ON THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-10-14 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-10-14 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-14 10:26:12 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE RETAIL MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS | | | REQUIRED ON THE PLANS. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY PROVIDE A | | | LETTER FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL MANAGEMENT WHICH APPROVES | | | THE SPECIFIC PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) THE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED AND LABELED AS THE | | | SURVEY IS A SITE PLAN, NOT A SURVEY. STAFF HAS REVIEWED | | | A PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED SURVEY, AND IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | PROPOSED FENCE MAY ENCROACH AN EXISTING 12-FOOT | | | BELLSOUTH EASEMENT. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY AND | | | EITHER 1) CLEARLY SHOW THE PROPOSED FENCE OUTSIDE OF | | | THE EASEMENT LIMITS, OR 2) PROVIDE AN EASEMENT CONSENT | | | FROM BELLSOUTH FOR THE ENCROACHMENT. | | | | | | 3) STAFF MET WITH MANAGEMENT AND THIS IS PROPOSED TO BE | | | A SCREEN FENCE. CHAIN LINK, AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION | | | DRAWING, DOES NOT PROVIDE SCREENING. THE SITE PLAN | | | LISTS THAT BLACK ALUMINUM SLATS WILL BE USED ON THE | | | FENCE. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT CHAIN LINK WITH SLATS | | | FOR SCREENING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
