Plan Review Details - Permit 22061347
Plan Review Stops For Permit 22061347
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 12:04:14DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH APPROVED ADDRESS.
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-30 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-06-30 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-06-30 Time 12:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-30 12:17:11ADDRESS OF 1355 S FLAGLER DR WAS APPROVED FOR THIS
 PROJECT ON 2/16/22 BY ROBERT FRISBIE JR.PLEASE UPDATE
 THE DOCUMENTS SHOWING THE AGREED UPON ADDRESS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-11 Time 10:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-11 Time 10:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 11:07 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-06 11:13:20****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
 FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL
  
 2ND REVIEW IS INCLUDED BELOW FOR REFERENCE.
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT #3, # 5 - THE CIVIL PAGE WITH
 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION IS STILL NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
 BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS REVIEWED THIS DOCUMENT AND IF
 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION IS SHOWN AND SPECIFIED, IT NEEDS
 TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AS AN UNLICENSED INDIVIDUAL
 (FS471, FS481) CANNOT SPECIFY THIS INFORMATION. THIS
 CAN BE REQUESTED TO BE DELETED, BUT THEN THE OTHER SITE
 PLAN NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO SHOW LENGTH OF WALL.
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT #1 - THE ENGINEERING CALCS
 STILL REFER TO ASCE7-10. IF ENGINEER WANTS TO PROPOSE
 USING THIS OUTDATED REFERENCE (FBC B SPECIFIES USE OF
 ASCE7-16) HE NEEDS TO SUBMIT A LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR CONSIDERATION.
  
 AFTER REVIEWS HAVE PASSED, A PAPER ORIGINAL WILL BE
 REQUIRED. THIS CAN BE A PROVISO ITEM.
  
 PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. ORIGINAL COMMENT - FBC B 1609, REVISE PLAN TO
 INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 2ND REVIEW, AN EMAIL WITHIN THE CALCULATIONS WAS
 INCLUDED WHICH STATED TO USE 54.0 PSF. PLEASE REVISE TO
 CLARIFY PER FBC B 1603.1.4 WHICH STATES THAT "THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL BE
 SHOWN" - ULTIMATE WIND SPEED, NOMINAL WIND SPEED, RISK
 CATEGORY, WIND EXPOSURE, CLADDING.
  
 THIS APPEARS TO BE EXPOSURE D - IF ENGINEER HAS
 DESIGNED TO A DIFFERENT EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION, PLEASE
 HAVE HIM EMAIL ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO DISCUSS.
  
 THE ENGINEER STATES THAT ASCE7-10 WAS USED FOR THE
 DESIGN. SEE FBC B CHAPTER 35, ASCE7-16 IS REQUIRED.
  
 2. ORIGINAL COMMENT - FBC B 1612, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH
 FLOOD ZONE THE PROPOSED WALL IS LOCATED IN. THE
 PROPOSED WALL IS TO EITHER MEET OUR FREEBOARD OF 2, OR
 IT IS TO BE DESIGNED TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS UP TO BASE
 FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 2'. WHEN REVISING THE PLAN, BE
 CLEAR IF THE ELEVATIONS SPECIFIED ARE NGVD29 OR NAVD88.
  
 2ND REVIEW, BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DETERMINED THAT
 FREEBOARD DOES NOT NEED TO APPLY. MY CONVERSATIONS WITH
 MICHAEL SPRUCE, PE INDICATED THAT HE IS AWARE THAT THIS
 NEEDS TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS TO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF
 WHAT APPEARS TO BE 7' (FLOOD LINE IS NOT SHOWN BUT
 APPEARS TO BE 7' NAVD88). I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE
 RESISTANCE TO FLOOD LOADS ADDRESSED ON THE STRUCTURAL
 ENGINEER'S PLANS. THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NEEDS TO
 INCORPORATE THIS DESIGN CRITERIA INTO HIS PLAN, SEE FBC
 B 1612.4 WHICH STATES:
  
 1612.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
 THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
 LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, INCLUDING COASTAL HIGH
 HAZARD AREAS AND COASTAL A ZONES, SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5 OF ASCE 7 AND WITH ASCE 24.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. THE ENGINEERING SHOULD
 INCLUDE THE ELEVATIONS AND SHOULD INDICATE COMPLIANCE
 TO DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. SEE ASCE-24 SECTION 1.5.
  
 3. FBC 107, REVISE THE PLAN TO CLARIFY WALL LENGTH.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? ADDRESSED; SEE ITEM 5 BELOW. IF THIS PAGE
 IS REMOVED THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO
 THE SITE PLAN.
  
 4. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR
 PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED
 ORIGINALS. PLEASE UPLOAD DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS. IF THE
 ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE HAVE
 HIM SEND ME AN EMAIL SO WE CAN DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
 2ND REVIEW - SINCE THE ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE
 DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, ORIGINAL PAPER
 SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING WILL BE REQUIRED AFTER
 ALL REVIEWS HAVE PASSED. A SCAN OF SIGNED AND SEALED
 ENGINEERING IS NOT CONSIDERED ?ORIGINAL ENGINEERING? BY
 FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, SEE FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 5. FLORIDA STATUTE 471, A NEW PAGE WAS SUBMITTED NAMED
 "FLAGLER TOWERS - MOCKUP LOCATION". THIS PAGE PROVIDES
 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION, THEREFORE SHOULD BE PREPARED BY
 A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. EITHER HAVE THIS PAGE SIGNED AND
 SEALED, AND INCLUDE THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE ENGINEER
 TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN, OR INCORPORATE
 THE INFORMATION INTO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PREPARED
 BY THE ENGINEER. THE SITE PLAN WHICH SIMPLY SHOWS THE
 LOCATION IS OK, BUT THE NEW PAGE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL
 AND FLOOD RELATED INFORMATION. IT APPEARS THAT THIS
 PAGE IS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1612.4, BUT IS
 NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, AND DOES NOT
 STATE THAT IT WILL RESIST FLOOD LOADS TO 7? NAVD88,
 ONLY STATES THAT THE TOP OF THE FOOTER WILL BE AT 7?.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-01 Time 14:54 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 12:45:39****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
 FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. ORIGINAL COMMENT - FBC B 1609, REVISE PLAN TO
 INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 2ND REVIEW, AN EMAIL WITHIN THE CALCULATIONS WAS
 INCLUDED WHICH STATED TO USE 54.0 PSF. PLEASE REVISE TO
 CLARIFY PER FBC B 1603.1.4 WHICH STATES THAT "THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL BE
 SHOWN" - ULTIMATE WIND SPEED, NOMINAL WIND SPEED, RISK
 CATEGORY, WIND EXPOSURE, CLADDING.
  
 THIS APPEARS TO BE EXPOSURE D - IF ENGINEER HAS
 DESIGNED TO A DIFFERENT EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION, PLEASE
 HAVE HIM EMAIL ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO DISCUSS.
  
 THE ENGINEER STATES THAT ASCE7-10 WAS USED FOR THE
 DESIGN. SEE FBC B CHAPTER 35, ASCE7-16 IS REQUIRED.
  
 2. ORIGINAL COMMENT - FBC B 1612, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH
 FLOOD ZONE THE PROPOSED WALL IS LOCATED IN. THE
 PROPOSED WALL IS TO EITHER MEET OUR FREEBOARD OF 2, OR
 IT IS TO BE DESIGNED TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS UP TO BASE
 FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 2'. WHEN REVISING THE PLAN, BE
 CLEAR IF THE ELEVATIONS SPECIFIED ARE NGVD29 OR NAVD88.
  
 2ND REVIEW, BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DETERMINED THAT
 FREEBOARD DOES NOT NEED TO APPLY. MY CONVERSATIONS WITH
 MICHAEL SPRUCE, PE INDICATED THAT HE IS AWARE THAT THIS
 NEEDS TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS TO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF
 WHAT APPEARS TO BE 7' (FLOOD LINE IS NOT SHOWN BUT
 APPEARS TO BE 7' NAVD88). I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE
 RESISTANCE TO FLOOD LOADS ADDRESSED ON THE STRUCTURAL
 ENGINEER'S PLANS. THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NEEDS TO
 INCORPORATE THIS DESIGN CRITERIA INTO HIS PLAN, SEE FBC
 B 1612.4 WHICH STATES:
  
 1612.4 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
 THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
 LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, INCLUDING COASTAL HIGH
 HAZARD AREAS AND COASTAL A ZONES, SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5 OF ASCE 7 AND WITH ASCE 24.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. THE ENGINEERING SHOULD
 INCLUDE THE ELEVATIONS AND SHOULD INDICATE COMPLIANCE
 TO DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. SEE ASCE-24 SECTION 1.5.
  
 3. FBC 107, REVISE THE PLAN TO CLARIFY WALL LENGTH.
  
 2ND REVIEW ? ADDRESSED; SEE ITEM 5 BELOW. IF THIS PAGE
 IS REMOVED THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO
 THE SITE PLAN.
  
 4. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR
 PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED
 ORIGINALS. PLEASE UPLOAD DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS. IF THE
 ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE HAVE
 HIM SEND ME AN EMAIL SO WE CAN DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
 2ND REVIEW - SINCE THE ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE
 DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, ORIGINAL PAPER
 SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING WILL BE REQUIRED AFTER
 ALL REVIEWS HAVE PASSED. A SCAN OF SIGNED AND SEALED
 ENGINEERING IS NOT CONSIDERED ?ORIGINAL ENGINEERING? BY
 FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, SEE FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 5. FLORIDA STATUTE 471, A NEW PAGE WAS SUBMITTED NAMED
 "FLAGLER TOWERS - MOCKUP LOCATION". THIS PAGE PROVIDES
 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION, THEREFORE SHOULD BE PREPARED BY
 A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. EITHER HAVE THIS PAGE SIGNED AND
 SEALED, AND INCLUDE THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE ENGINEER
 TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN, OR INCORPORATE
 THE INFORMATION INTO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PREPARED
 BY THE ENGINEER. THE SITE PLAN WHICH SIMPLY SHOWS THE
 LOCATION IS OK, BUT THE NEW PAGE INCLUDES STRUCTURAL
 AND FLOOD RELATED INFORMATION. IT APPEARS THAT THIS
 PAGE IS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1612.4, BUT IS
 NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, AND DOES NOT
 STATE THAT IT WILL RESIST FLOOD LOADS TO 7? NAVD88,
 ONLY STATES THAT THE TOP OF THE FOOTER WILL BE AT 7?.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-07-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-07-19 Time 18:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-07-19 Time 18:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-19 18:49:49****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
 FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. FBC B 1609, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA.
  
 2. FBC B 1612, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH FLOOD ZONE THE
 PROPOSED WALL IS LOCATED IN. THE PROPOSED WALL IS TO
 EITHER MEET OUR FREEBOARD OF 2, OR IT IS TO BE DESIGNED
 TO RESIST FLOOD LOADS UP TO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS
 2'. WHEN REVISING THE PLAN, BE CLEAR IF THE ELEVATIONS
 SPECIFIED ARE NGVD29 OR NAVD88.
  
 3. FBC 107, REVISE THE PLAN TO CLARIFY WALL LENGTH.
  
 4. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR
 PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED
 ORIGINALS. PLEASE UPLOAD DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS. IF THE
 ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE HAVE
 HIM SEND ME AN EMAIL SO WE CAN DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-08-01 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2022-08-01 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2022-08-01 Time 15:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2022-06-29 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2022-06-29 Time 12:46 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-29 12:55:56THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1) THERE IS A A SITE PLAN INDICATION OF A GENERAL
 LOCATION OF A MOCK WALL, HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO DETAILS
 INCLUDING DIMENSIONS OF THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE WALL.
  
 FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD, PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC
 LOCATION DETAILS INCLUDING DIMENSION TO NEARBY
 STRUCTURES, OBJECTS, & EXIT DOORS.
  
 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
  
 1.7.12.1 THE AHJ SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE
 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH
 APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 1.7.12.6 PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE AHJ PRIOR TO
 THE ALTERATION OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS OR FIRE
 PROTECTION SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW ENSURE AND PROVIDE ACCURATE DINMESIONS
 THAT EGRESS AND EGRESS PATHS ARE NOT OBSTUCTED NOR
 INTERFERE WITH THE PATH OF TRAVEL.
  
  
  
 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-08-11 Time 13:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-08-09 Time 16:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 11:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 06:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-07-29 Time 12:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-07-25 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-07-25 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-06-28 Time 09:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-11 Time 10:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-11 Time 10:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-11 10:44:46PROVISO - SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 11:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-06 Time 11:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-06 11:13:42SEE BUILDING
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-02 Time 12:45 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 12:45:55SEE BUILDING
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-07-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-07-19 Time 18:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-07-19 Time 18:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-11 Time 13:06 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-11 Time 13:06 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-07-28 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-07-28 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-07-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-07-25 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-07-25 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-25 09:50:34FAILED
  
 1) THE LOCATION OF THE PROSED WALL MOCK UP MUST BE
 SHOWN ON A SURVEY OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE WALL
 AND SUPPORTS MUST BE SHOWN TO SCALE AND INCLUDE
 DIMENSIONS AND THE SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 2) THE WALL MAY NOT EXCEED SIX FEET IN HEIGHT WITHIN
 THE 25 FOOT SETBACK FROM SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 3) WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TIME FRAME FOR THE WALL TO BE
 IN PLACE?
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THE
 INFORMATION REQUIRED BY COMMENT #1 IS PROVIDED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved