Plan Review Details - Permit 22051129
Plan Review Stops For Permit 22051129
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2023-03-09 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2023-03-09 Time 21:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2023-03-09 Time 19:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2023-01-18 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2023-01-18 Time 22:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2023-01-18 Time 21:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-07-12 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-12 Time 19:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-12 Time 18:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-03 Time 11:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-03 11:32:09ENGINEERING REVIEW UNDER WCF ROW PERMIT 21120234
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2023-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2023-06-21 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2023-02-23 Time 09:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2023-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2023-02-03 Time 15:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2023-01-11 Time 06:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-08-03 Time 12:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2022-06-21 Time 04:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2023-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2023-06-21 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2023-06-21 Time 09:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2023-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2023-02-03 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2023-02-03 Time 15:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-07-12 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-12 Time 19:03 Rev Time  
Received By fgiaquin Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2023-06-16 Cont ID  
Sent By avolcy Date 2023-06-16 Time 11:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By avolcy Date 2023-06-16 Time 11:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2023-02-02 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2023-02-02 Time 15:18 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2023-02-02 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-02 15:19:18FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120234) MUST BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS
 ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED
 WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THESE COMMENTS
 MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED FOR THE WCF ROW PERMIT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC
 DISTRICT. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC
 PRESERVATION OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION.
  
 3) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE
 HEIGHT OF A CAMERA POLE AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE
 VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. THE
 ENGINEERING SITE PLAN CALLS OUT A LIGHT POLE THAT IS 14
 FEET IN HEIGHT. PER CITY CODE, NEITHER WILL PERMIT THE
 PROPOSED 24-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS FACILITY POLE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN AND THE RAYCAP POLE SPECIFICATION PAGES,
 NOR THE 28-FOOT TALL POLE SHOWN ON SHEETS C-3, E-2 AND
 E-3.
  
 A. THERE APPEAR TO BE NEARBY POLES THAT ARE TALLER THAN
 THE LABELED POLES. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT DIMENSION SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY
 POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE.
 B. ALL SHEETS NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT
 POLE HEIGHTS.
  
 4) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS THE
 PROPOSED POLE AT 16.7 FEET FROM THE SPRUCE AVENUE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. STAFF LOCATED A SURVEY FOR THE HOUSE ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH STREET, WHICH SHOWS A 15.6-FOOT
 SETBACK FROM SPRUCE AVENUE. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 78-411(B)(2) OF THE CITY CODE
 WHICH REQUIRES THAT THE POLE BE NOT DIRECTLY IN FRONT
 OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE
 POLE MUST BE SHOWN NO FURTHER THAN 15.6 FEET FROM THE
 SPRUCE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE POLE NEEDS TO BE
 SHIFTED APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF FEET TO THE EAST.
  
 5) THE PLANS SHOW THE HANDHOLE EXCAVATION AND THE BORE
 PIT EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO A COM LINE AND AN
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE, RESPECTIVELY. IN ORDER TO
 VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH
 THE EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY
 LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM THE COM PROVIDER(S), MOST
 LIKELY AT&T OR COMCAST AND FPL.
  
 6) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-03 Time 11:37 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-03 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-03 11:38:30FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120234) MUST BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS
 ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED
 WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THESE COMMENTS
 MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED FOR THE WCF ROW PERMIT.
  
 2) THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION.
  
 3) THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE HEIGHT OF A CAMERA POLE
 AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED
 WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. THE ENGINEERING PLAN CALLS OUT
 A LIGHT POLE THAT IS 14 FEET IN HEIGHT. PER CITY CODE,
 NEITHER WILL PERMIT THE PROPOSED 24-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS
 FACILITY POLE. THERE APPEAR TO BE NEARBY POLES THAT ARE
 TALLER THAN THE LABELED POLES. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT
 DIMENSION SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED
 WIRELESS FACILITY POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT
 ALLOWANCE.
  
 4) THE ENGINEERING PLAN THAT IS OVERLAID ON THE AERIAL
 NEEDS TO SHOW THE HOUSE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH
 STREET SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE POLE IS NOT
 DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. STAFF HAS TRIED TO LINE
 UP THE POLE THE PROPOSED 16.7-FOOT DIMENSION FROM THE
 INTERSECTION THAT IS PROVIDE ON THE SURVEY, AND IT
 APPEARS THAT THE WIRELESS FACILITY POLE IS DIRECTLY IN
 FRONT OF THE HOUSE. THE WIRELESS FACILITY POLE MAY NEED
 TO BE SHIFTED A FEW FEET TO THE EAST TO COMPLY WITH
 THIS CODE REQUIREMENT.
  
 5) THE HANDHOLE AND BORE PIT NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE
 THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THE IS
 BOTH PARKWAY AND SIDEWALKS THAT WILL NEED RESTORATION.
 PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 6) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING UTILITIES.
  
 7) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved