City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 22050916

Plan Review Stops For Permit 22050916

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	10	Status	P	Date	2023-05-12			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-05-12	Time	15:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-05-12	Time	15:12	Sent To

Notes

2023-05-12 15:15:06	05/12/23 LEFT ORIGINAL VALUE TO ISUE PERMIT. JG.

	BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
	1--DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: PROVIDE
	COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE
	BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G)GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	9	Status	F	Date	2023-05-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-05-08	Time	16:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-05-05	Time	18:53	Sent To

Notes

2023-05-08 16:05:42	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION NINE BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	NEW COMMENT:

	1- THE ORIGINAL VALUE OF $215,000 FOR THE PROPOSED
	SCOPE OF WORK WAS REASONABLE FOR THIS JOB. THE VALUE
	WAS REVISED TO BE $125,050. THIS VALUE IS TOO LOW FOR
	ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. ONLY THE VALUE
	WAS DECREASED AND THE SCOPE OF WORK REMAINED THE SAME.
	AT THIS POINT THE VALUE DECLARED IN THE ORIGINAL PERMIT
	APPLICATION WILL REMAIN. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PROVISO:
	2-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: PROVIDE
	COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE
	BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G)GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]


2023-04-28 12:57:58	VERIFY VALUE IF VALUE WAS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL
	APPLICATION

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	8	Status	P	Date	2023-04-19			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-19	Time	11:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-19	Time	10:45	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-19 11:15:21	PROVISO:
	1-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: PROVIDE
	COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE
	BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G)GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	7	Status	F	Date	2023-04-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-17	Time	10:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-17	Time	10:27	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-17 10:52:29	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SEVEN BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	1- NEW COMMENT ON SOIL TEST REPORT BASED ON INFORMATION
	SUBMITTED.
	SOIL TEST REPORT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX ON 4/4/23 DATED
	APRIL, 2022 ON THE FRONT PAGE. IT LOOKS LIKE THIS SOIL
	TEST REPORT WAS REVISED ON APRIL 8, 2022 AS SHOWN ON
	THE PREVIOUS REPORT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX ON 2/23/23.
	CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS THE CORRECT REPORT TO BE USED FOR
	THIS PROJECT.
	NOTE: FOOTING SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS ARE COMPLIANT WITH
	REVISED SOIL TEST REPORT DATED APRIL, 8, 2022 NOT WITH
	THE ONE DATED APRIL 7, 2002. IF USING REPORT DATED
	APRIL 7, 202, THEN THE FOOTING SIZE ON PLANS WILL NEED
	TO BE REVISED OR ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE
	EXPLANATION WHY NOT FOLLOWING THE SOIL TEST REPORT
	FOOTING SIZING RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 AND
	107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED IS NOT THE
	REVISED REPORT DATED APRIL 8TH, 2022. IF THIS IS THE
	CORRECT REPORT TO USE, THEN ENGINEER OF RECORD TO
	PROVIDE EXPLANATION WHY NOT FOLLOWING THE SOIL TEST
	REPORT FOOTING SIZING RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 AND
	107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.



	PROVISO:
	1-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: PROVIDE
	COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE
	BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G)GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-04-11			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	10:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-10	Time	17:41	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-11 10:47:50	BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	1- NEW COMMENT ON SOIL TEST REPORT BASED ON INFORMATION
	SUBMITTED.
	SOIL TEST REPORT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX ON 4/4/23 DATED
	APRIL, 2022 ON THE FRONT PAGE. IT LOOKS LIKE THIS SOIL
	TEST REPORT WAS REVISED ON APRIL 8, 2022 AS SHOWN ON
	THE PREVIOUS REPORT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX ON 2/23/23.
	CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS THE CORRECT REPORT TO BE USED FOR
	THIS PROJECT.
	NOTE: FOOTING SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS ARE COMPLIANT WITH
	REVISED SOIL TEST REPORT DATED APRIL, 8, 2022 NOT WITH
	THE ONE DATED APRIL 7, 2002. IF USING REPORT DATED
	APRIL 7, 202, THEN THE FOOTING SIZE ON PLANS WILL NEED
	TO BE REVISED OR ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE
	EXPLANATION WHY NOT FOLLOWING THE SOIL TEST REPORT
	FOOTING RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 AND 107.2.1.2
	CITY AMENDMENTS.

	2- THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON SOIL TEST REPORT UPLOADED
	TO PROJECTDOX ON 4/4/2023 IS INVALID. IT SHOW THAT THE
	DOCUMENT WAS UPDATED SINCE SIGNED. PROVIDE SOIL TEST
	REPORT WITH VALID VERIFIABLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE .
	ENGINEERS
	61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
	SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
	SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.


	PROVISO:
	1-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: PROVIDE
	COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE
	BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G)GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.


	NOTE;
	PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO UPLOAD THE IMPACT FEES
	QUESTIONNAIRE. SEE IMPACT FEESS REVIEW. THIS IS
	REQUIRED TO FINISH PROCESSING THE PERMIT.


	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2023-03-07			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	17:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	16:26	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-07 17:06:56	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION FIFTH BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	NOTE:
	ARCHITECT TO PAY $3775.00 FOR FOUR TIMES THE PLAN
	REVIEW PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B).

	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	9-RESPONSE LETTER STATES "EXISTING ROOF IS VENTED,
	PLEASE SEE SHEET A1-4.4 FOR VENT LOCATION, CALCULATION
	AND SIZES. ALSO, PLEASE SEE MEPS ENERGY CALC SHEET
	CORRECTIONS. ICYNENE INSULATION REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NEW FLAT ROOF IS UNVENTED
	BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ATTIC."

	ARCHITECT AND MEP ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS AND
	ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS
	AND AVOID THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER FLORIDA STATUTE
	553.80(2)(B).
	CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET
	A1-4.2 SHOW ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION ON THE ROOF THERMAL
	ENVELOPE (BELOW ROOF SHEATHING) FOR EXISTING PITCHED
	ROOF. ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION IS TYPICALLY USED WHEN
	THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC.
	IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN CLARIFY WHY
	SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
	ON SHEET A1-4.4?. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR
	VENTED AND UNVENTED ATTICS INFORMATION AND REVISE PLANS
	AS REQUIRED.
	FLAT ROOF IS OK AS AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH THE ICYNENE
	R-30 INSULATION.

	ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE
	CORRECT INFORMATION. FIRST, NEED TO COORDINATE WITH
	ARCHITECT IF EXISTING ROOF IS GOING TO BE VENTED OR NOT
	AND NEED TO ADD THE UNVENTED FLAT ROOF AREAS.

	RESPONSE:
	(A)RESPONSE LETTER SAYS "ALL ROOFS WILL BE VENTED.
	ICYNENE HAS BEEN REMOVED AS INSULATION TYPE".
	EXISTING-SECTION 02/A1-4.2 STILL SHOWS ICYNENE R-30
	INSULATION. STILL NO CLEAR IF DESIGNING VENTED OR
	UNVENTED ATTIC. ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF R-30
	INSULATION (BATT INSULATION???).SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.
	NOTE: ALSO. LOCATION OF INSULATION IS NOT CLEAR.
	SECTION SHOWS INSULATION BELOW THE ROOF RAFTER. THIS
	LOCATION DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EITHER A VENTED OR
	UNVENTED ATTIC. VENTED ATTIC HAVE THE INSULATION ABOVE
	THE CEILING. UNVENTED ATTICS HAVE THE INSULATION JUST
	BELOW THE ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE ALL SECTIONS AS
	REQUIRED. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR OPTIONS FOR
	VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #12
	BELOW REGARDING ATTIC VENTILATION AND REVISE ALL
	SECTIONS AS REQUIRED.

	(B)PROPOSED-SECTION 01/A1-4.2 SHOWS ICYNENE R-30
	INSULATION IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE FLAT ROOF AND
	R-30 INSULATION ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE SAME FLAT
	ROOF. STILL NO CLEAR IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED
	ATTIC.
	NEW ROOF DETAIL 04/A1-4.2 FOR THE FLAT ROOF SPECIFIES
	R-30 INSULATION BUT IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY VENTILATION.
	ALSO, PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.1
	STATES "NOTE: NO VENTILATION" ON FRONT AND REAR FLAT
	ROOFS. REVISE ALL PLANS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID
	MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF R-30 INSULATION. IF USING
	R-30 BATT INSULATION, THEN ROOF CROSS VENTILATION IS
	REQUIRED. ALSO, R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON 2X6 ROOF
	RAFTERS SPECIFIED ON FOR FRONT FLAT ROOF.

	(C)PROPOSED-SECTION 01/A1-4.2 SHOWS ICYNENE R-30
	INSULATION ON THE PITCHED ROOF ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE.
	NOTE: ALSO. LOCATION OF INSULATION IS NOT CLEAR.
	SECTION SHOWS INSULATION BELOW THE ROOF RAFTER. THIS
	LOCATION DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EITHER A VENTED OR
	UNVENTED ATTIC. VENTED ATTIC HAVE THE INSULATION ABOVE
	THE CEILING. UNVENTED ATTICS HAVE THE INSULATION JUST
	BELOW THE ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE ALL SECTIONS AS
	REQUIRED. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR OPTIONS FOR
	VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #12
	BELOW REGARDING ATTIC VENTILATION AND REVISE ALL
	SECTIONS AS REQUIRED.
	SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	(D)ROOF VENTS SHOWN ON PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET
	A1-4.4 AND PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.1 DON'T
	MATCH. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY ONE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN TO
	AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	12- RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEET
	A1-4.1 INDICATING ROOF PITCH".
	THIS IS INCORRECT. THE REQUEST WAS TO SPECIFY ROOF
	VENTILATION NOT ROOF PITCH. READ SEC. R806
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION
	FOR CROSS VENTILATION FOR ALL ROOF AREAS. (SEE NOTE ON
	ITEM #12 ABOVE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE).

	RESPONSE:
	SEE RESPONSE COMMENTS ON ITEM #9 ABOVE AND COORDINATE
	AS REQUIRED TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
	ROOF CROSS VENTILATION SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY VENTS SIZE AND LOCATION FOR FLAT AND PITCHED
	ROOFS.
	NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING
	UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC.
	R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	REVISE ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THE
	FLAT ROOFS IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE DESIGNED AS VENTED
	ROOFS.

	13- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE:
	PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT
	ISSUANCE BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE
	APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
	SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G) NEW GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.

	14- ADDITIONAL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: IF USING ICYNENE
	INSULATION, THEN PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE
	ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
	R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
	WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
	B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM
	#9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND
	SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE:
	THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO
	BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	THIS CANNOT BE REVIEWED UNTIL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE
	CORRECTED TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTIC
	DESIGN FOR FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS.

	ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
	HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED TO AVOID MORE
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
	COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2023-01-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-26	Time	11:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-25	Time	14:44	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-26 11:19:59	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION FOURTH BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD


	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS
	TO DEPICT THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. NEED TO
	SPECIFY INSULATION MATERIALS AND THEIR R-VALUES.(ROOF,
	WALLS, RAISED FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE, ETC.) AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THERE ARE FLAT ROOFS AND PITCHED
	ROOFS. AND, COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PROPOSED SECTION 01/A1-4.3 ON SHEET A1-4.3 SHOWS
	ICYNENE INSULATION IN THE PITCHED AND FLAT ROOF AREAS.
	IT LOOKS LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC.
	IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN ARCHITECT TO CLARIFY
	WHY SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON DETAIL
	03/A1-4.3 AND DETAIL 04/A1-4.3 ON THE SAME SHEET?
	PROVIDE ICYNENE INSULATION ICC EVALUATION REPORT.
	ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE EVALUATION REPORT PRIOR
	TO SUBMITTAL. (NOTE: THIS REPORT MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER
	AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION).

	RESPONSE:
	RESPONSE LETTER STATES "EXISTING ROOF IS VENTED, PLEASE
	SEE SHEET A1-4.4 FOR VENT LOCATION, CALCULATION AND
	SIZES. ALSO, PLEASE SEE MEPS ENERGY CALC SHEET
	CORRECTIONS. ICYNENE INSULATION REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NEW FLAT ROOF IS UNVENTED
	BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ATTIC."

	ARCHITECT AND MEP ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS AND
	ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS
	AND AVOID THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER FLORIDA STATUTE
	553.80(2)(B).
	CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET
	A1-4.2 SHOW ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION ON THE ROOF THERMAL
	ENVELOPE (BELOW ROOF SHEATHING) FOR EXISTING PITCHED
	ROOF. ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION IS TYPICALLY USED WHEN
	THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC.
	IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN CLARIFY WHY
	SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
	ON SHEET A1-4.4?. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR
	VENTED AND UNVENTED ATTICS INFORMATION AND REVISE PLANS
	AS REQUIRED.
	FLAT ROOF IS OK AS AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH THE ICYNENE
	R-30 INSULATION.

	ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE
	CORRECT INFORMATION. FIRST, NEED TO COORDINATE WITH
	ARCHITECT IF EXISTING ROOF IS GOING TO BE VENTED OR NOT
	AND NEED TO ADD THE UNVENTED FLAT ROOF AREAS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	10- ROOF WITH LESS THAN 6" EAVES REQUIRES GUTTERS WITH
	DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY GUTTERS ON PLANS. PROVIDE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION OF DOWNSPOUTS.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	REVISE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (SHEET A1-4.1). THERE IS A
	FLAT ROOF (REAR AND FRONT AREAS). NEED TO SPECIFY
	SCUPPERS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOF WHERE THE EAVE IS
	LESS THAN 6". THE ONLY EXCEPTION WHERE GUTTER IS NOT
	REQUIRED IS FOR GABLE ROOFS.

	RESPONSE:
	REVISED ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.4 ONLY SHOWS GUTTERS ON
	TWO SIDES OF THE REAR FLAT ROOF. NEED TO PROVIDE
	GUTTERS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE FLAT ROOF WHERE THE
	EAVE IS LESS THAN 6" AS REQUESTED ON THE PREVIOUS
	COMMENT. THE ONLY EXCEPTION WHERE GUTTER IS NOT
	REQUIRED IS FOR GABLE ROOFS.
	NOTE: IF THE NEW FLAT ROOF ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE
	HAS AN EAVE OF LESS THAN 6" ON THE WEST SIDE, THEN NEED
	TO PROVIDE GUTTERS AS WELL.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	12- DESIGNER OF RECORD OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF
	VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND LOCATION.
	NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING
	UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC.
	R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEET
	A1-4.1 INDICATING ROOF PITCH".
	THIS IS INCORRECT. THE REQUEST WAS TO SPECIFY ROOF
	VENTILATION NOT ROOF PITCH. READ SEC. R806
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION
	FOR CROSS VENTILATION FOR ALL ROOF AREAS. (SEE NOTE ON
	ITEM #12 ABOVE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE).

	RESPONSE:
	SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #9 ABOVE.


	13- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE:
	PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT
	ISSUANCE BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE
	APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
	SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.
	B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
	C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	D)FIXED WINDOWS.
	E) REAR SWING DOOR.
	F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.
	G) NEW GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION.


	14- ADDITIONAL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE ICC
	EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION TO
	VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
	WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.

	17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM
	#9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND
	SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE:
	THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO
	BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNER OF
	RECORD TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ARCHITECT OF
	RECORD IS SPECIFYING ICYNENE ATTIC INSULATION. IT LOOKS
	LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTICS. ITEM
	#11(B) SPECIFIES A VENTED ATTIC. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO
	MATCH PLANS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE.

	RESPONSE:
	SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #9 ABOVE.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
	HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE
	REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
	COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2022-12-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	17:46	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	17:46	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 17:47:54	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION THIRD BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW


	PREVIOUS RESPONSE COMMENT:
	1- BASED ON DRAWINGS SUBMITTED, 12" DEEP FOOTINGS DON'T
	PROVIDE 12" MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH. SEE SECTION 1 ON
	SHEET S-200. ALSO, ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT OF RECORD
	NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH AND CLEARANCE FOR TERMITE
	INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.1.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL
	AND SEC. R318.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	ALSO, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE TYPE OF
	FOOTING. ARCHITECT SHOWS A DIFFERENT FOOTING TYPE ON
	SHEET A1-4.2.

	NEW RESPONSE TO ENGINEERS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 22,
	2022:
	ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "SECTION R403.1.4
	APPLIES TO ISOLATED AND STRIP FOOTINGS. THIS IS A
	MONOLITHIC FOOTING."
	THIS IS INCORRECT. SECTION R403.1.4 APPLIES TO "ALL
	EXTERIOR FOOTINGS". THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS. SEE
	SECTION R403.1.4 AND REVISE ALL DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED.
	ALSO, PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH AND CLEARANCE FOR
	TERMITE INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.1.4
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND SEC. R318.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.


	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS
	TO DEPICT THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. NEED TO
	SPECIFY INSULATION MATERIALS AND THEIR R-VALUES.(ROOF,
	WALLS, RAISED FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE, ETC.) AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THERE ARE FLAT ROOFS AND PITCHED
	ROOFS. AND, COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.

	RESPONSE:
	PROPOSED SECTION 01/A1-4.3 ON SHEET A1-4.3 SHOWS
	ICYNENE INSULATION IN THE PITCHED AND FLAT ROOF AREAS.
	IT LOOKS LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC.
	IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN ARCHITECT TO CLARIFY
	WHY SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON DETAIL
	03/A1-4.3 AND DETAIL 04/A1-4.3 ON THE SAME SHEET?
	PROVIDE ICYNENE INSULATION ICC EVALUATION REPORT.
	ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE EVALUATION REPORT PRIOR
	TO SUBMITTAL. (NOTE: THIS REPORT MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER
	AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION)

	NOTE: THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH SUBMITTED REVISED
	DRAWINGS. IT LOOKS LIKE THE NUMBER OF THE DRAWINGS WERE
	REVISED BY THE ARCHITECT. FOR EXAMPLE ORIGINAL PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS WAS DRAWING A1-4.1. REVISED PROPOSED
	ELEVATIONS DRAWING NUMBER WAS CHANGED TO DRAWING
	A1-4.2. THIS CREATES A CONFLICT BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS
	PROPOSED ELEVATIONS DRAWING WAS VERSIONED WITH THE
	REVISED PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. NOW THE FILE NAME DOESN'T
	MATCH THE REVISED DRAWING NUMBER.
	NEED TO COORDINATE WITH THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN TO GET THE
	CORRECT FILE NAME AND DRAWING NUMBER.
	THIS APPLIES TO FILE #008 ALSO. THE FILE NAME AND THE
	DRAWING NUMBER DON'T MATCH). COORDINATE FILE #007, #008
	AND #009 TO MATCH FILE NAME AND DRAWING NUMBER.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	10- ROOF WITH LESS THAN 6" EAVES REQUIRES GUTTERS WITH
	DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY GUTTERS ON PLANS. PROVIDE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION OF DOWNSPOUTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REVISE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (SHEET A1-4.1). THERE IS A
	FLAT ROOF (REAR AND FRONT AREAS). NEED TO SPECIFY
	SCUPPERS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOF WHERE THE EAVE IS
	LESS THAN 6". THE ONLY EXCEPTION WHERE GUTTER IS NOT
	REQUIRED IS FOR GABLE ROOFS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	12- DESIGNER OF RECORD OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF
	VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND LOCATION.
	NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING
	UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC.
	R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEET
	A1-4.1 INDICATING ROOF PITCH".
	THIS IS INCORRECT. THE REQUEST WAS TO SPECIFY ROOF
	VENTILATION NOT ROOF PITCH. READ SEC. R806
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION
	FOR CROSS VENTILATION FOR ALL ROOF AREAS. (SEE NOTE ON
	ITEM #12 ABOVE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE).

	13- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE:
	PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT
	ISSUANCE BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE
	APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
	SUBMITTAL:
	A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	D)INSWING ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. (NOTE: FLOOR
	PLAN ON SHEET A1-4. WAS CHANGED SHOWING AN OUTSWING
	DOOR BUT PROPOSED WINDOWS & DOORS FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET
	A1-4.3 WAS NOT REVISED. NEED TO REVISE BOTH PLANS TO
	MATCH AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS).

	E)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.
	F)FIXED WINDOWS.
	G) REAR SWING DOOR.
	H)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.

	14- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	15- BEDROOM #3 WINDOW W-11: PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S
	SPEC'S SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS
	OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO VERIFY CLEAR
	WIDTH OPENING ON SPECIFIED SIZE WITH 4 PANELS.

	RESPONSE:
	RESPONSE LETTER STATES "WINDOW TO BE REPLACED WITH
	3-EQUAL SIZE PANELS".
	WINDOW SCHEDULE WAS NOT REVISED TO REFLECT THIS CHANCE.
	ALSO, ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER IS REFERENCING SEC.
	R310.2.5 REPLACEMENT WINDOWS. BEDROOM #3 NEEDS TO
	COMPLY WITH THE EMERGENCY EGRESS REQUIREMENTS,
	ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS, THIS ROOM IS A CHANGE OF
	OCCUPANCY. THIS ROOM WAS EITHER A GARAGE OR CARPORT AND
	THERE ARE NO CITY RECORDS FOR THE CONVERSION OF THIS
	ROOM TO LIVABLE AREA.

	17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:

	A)

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM
	#9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND
	SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE:
	THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO
	BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNER OF
	RECORD TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ARCHITECT OF
	RECORD IS SPECIFYING ICYNENE ATTIC INSULATION. IT LOOKS
	LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTICS. ITEM
	#11(B) SPECIFIES A VENTED ATTIC. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO
	MATCH PLANS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE.

	C)

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	D) REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3. COORDINATE WITH
	ITEM (B) ABOVE.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: TYPICALLY THE VENT RATIO (WHEN PROVIDED) IS AT
	LEAST 1/150.
	IF ENGINEER PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WANTS TO
	USE 1/300 VENT RATIO, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
	DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
	RATIO. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT REVISED.
	NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #17(B) ABOVE.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
	HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE
	REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
	COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:09	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-18 15:09:38	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING
	REVIEW COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916
	372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	1- OK.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	B)SPECIFIED FOOTING SIZES DON'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
	FOOTING DEPTH REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.1.4
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE FOOTING SIZE AS REQUIRED.
	COORDINATE WITH TYPICAL WALL SECTION.
	NOTE: SHOW THE CLEARANCE FOR TERMITE INSPECTION ON THE
	WALL SECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL
	INSPECTION FOR TERMITES.

	RESPONSE:
	BASED ON DRAWINGS SUBMITTED, 12" DEEP FOOTINGS DON'T
	PROVIDE 12" MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH. SEE SECTION 1 ON
	SHEET S-200. ALSO, ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT OF RECORD
	NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH AND CLEARANCE FOR TERMITE
	INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	ALSO, ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE TYPE OF
	FOOTING. ARCHITECT SHOWS A DIFFERENT FOOTING TYPE ON
	SHEET A1-4.2.

	2- OK.
	3- OK.

	4- SHEET S-0.01:

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	A)ACCORDING TO TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THE
	COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES FOR WALLS AND
	ROOF ARE TOO LOW. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE ACTUAL
	CALCULATIONS.

	RESPONSE:
	PARTIALLY DONE. DESIGN PRESSURES WERE UPDATED BUT ROOF
	ZONES WHERE NOT. SEE COMMENT 4(C) BELOW.

	B)OK.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	C)REVISE ROOF DIAGRAM TO REFLECT THE REVISED ROOF ZONES
	ON CURRENT CODE FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	(1)PARTIALLY DONE. NEED TO IDENTIFY ALL ROOF ZONES. FOR
	EXAMPLE ZONE 2E, 2R, ZONE 3E, RR, ETC. SEE REVISED ROOF
	ZONES ON CURRENT CODE FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	(2)ROOF ZONES SHOWN ON THE GABLE ROOF DON'T MATCH
	FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. MISSING ZONES 2R, 2N
	AND R3.

	(3)CORNER OF FLAT ROOF ABOVE DOOR BY THE KITCHEN AREA
	ON THE SOUTH SIDE SEEM TO BE A ZONE 3 NOT A ZONE 2.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED. FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	5-OK.
	6-OK.
	7- OK.
	8-OK.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS
	TO DEPICT THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. NEED TO
	SPECIFY INSULATION MATERIALS AND THEIR R-VALUES.(ROOF,
	WALLS, RAISED FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE, ETC.) AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THERE ARE FLAT ROOFS AND PITCHED
	ROOFS. AND, COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED. INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. EITHER THE
	ENGINEER OR THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO PROVIDE THIS
	INFORMATION.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	10- ROOF WITH LESS THAN 6" EAVES REQUIRES GUTTERS WITH
	DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY GUTTERS ON PLANS. PROVIDE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION OF DOWNSPOUTS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED. INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. EITHER THE
	ENGINEER OR THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO PROVIDE THIS
	INFORMATION.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	11- ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY ROOF PITCH AS REQUIRED
	BY SEC. R905.11.1 SLOPE.
	MODIFIED BITUMEN MEMBRANE ROOFS SHALL HAVE A DESIGN
	SLOPE OF NOT LESS THAN ONE-FOURTH UNIT VERTICAL IN 12
	UNITS HORIZONTAL (2-PERCENT SLOPE) FOR DRAINAGE.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED. INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. EITHER THE
	ENGINEER OR THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO PROVIDE THIS
	INFORMATION.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF VENTILATION AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY VENT
	SIZE AND LOCATION.
	NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING
	UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC.
	R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED. INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. EITHER THE
	ENGINEER OR THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO PROVIDE THIS
	INFORMATION.

	13-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADVISE IF
	SUBMITTING NOW OR IF SUBMITTING LATER AS DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL.):

	A)OK
	B)OK.

	C)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	D)INSWING ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.

	E)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.

	F)FIXED WINDOWS.

	G) REAR SWING DOOR.

	H)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	14- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	15- BEDROOM #3 WINDOW W-11: PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S
	SPEC???S SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS
	REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO
	VERIFY CLEAR WIDTH OPENING ON SPECIFIED SIZE WITH 4
	PANELS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	16- NEED BATHROOM WITH MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRIVACY AND A
	DOOR THAT PROVIDES 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING AS REQUIRED
	BY SEC. R320.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: PLANS DON'T SPECIFY SIZE OF BATHROOM DOORS. NEED
	THIS INFORMATION.

	RESPONSE:
	NOT ADDRESSED.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENTS. NOT ADDRESSED. SEE COMMENTS BELOW AND
	REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	A)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
	INCLUDING OWNER NAME(NOT N/A), BUILDER NAME, PERMIT
	OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS IS JURISDICTION
	604700). SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM
	# 8 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND
	SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE:
	THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO
	BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	C)REVISE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 UNDER
	SPACES. OCCUPANTS WERE COUNTED TWICE. OCCUPANTS CAN NOT
	BE IN THE BEDROOM AND IN THE LIVING AREA AT THE SAME
	TIME. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	D) REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3. COORDINATE WITH
	ITEM (B) ABOVE.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: TYPICALLY THE VENT RATIO (WHEN PROVIDED) IS AT
	LEAST 1/150.
	IF ENGINEER PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WANTS TO
	USE 1/300 VENT RATIO, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
	DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
	RATIO. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	E)WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION DON'T MATCH
	PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-
	ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	F)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL
	(EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
	HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE
	REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
	COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-07-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	08:36	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-27 18:18:07	RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #22050916 372 FOREST HILL BLVD

	NOTE:
	ADDITIONS SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 1101.1
	FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS,
	COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	NOTE:
	LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. SEC. 604 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
	SEC. 901.2 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 801.3
	FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS,
	COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	1- FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET S-1.00:
	A)PROPOSED FOOTINGS DON'T MATCH FOOTING RECOMMENDATIONS
	SPECIFIED ON THE GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT SUBMITTED.
	ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT AND
	ADJUST FOOTINGS ACCORDINGLY OR PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE
	SHOWING WHY NOT FOLLOWING THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
	RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	B)SPECIFIED FOOTING SIZES DON'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
	FOOTING DEPTH REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.1.4
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE FOOTING SIZE AS REQUIRED.
	COORDINATE WITH TYPICAL WALL SECTION.
	NOTE: SHOW THE CLEARANCE FOR TERMITE INSPECTION ON THE
	WALL SECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.7 INSPECTION FOR
	TERMITES.

	2- DETAIL 3 ON SHEET S-2.01. BOTTOM CHORD OF ROOF
	RAFTERS IS REMOVED AND RELOCATED. TYPICALLY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CHORD ARE TIED TOGETHER TO ACT AS ONE STRUCTURAL
	MEMBER. CONNECTION IS ALTERED WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE
	BOTTOM CHORD. DETAIL IS MISSING INFORMATION OF HOW THE
	REMAINING CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TOP CHORD AND THE
	MASONRY WALL IS REINFORCED TO RESIST CURRENT LOADS.
	PROVIDE INFORMATION. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	3- SHEET S-0.00. ENGINEER TO REVISE THE DESIGN WIND
	LOADS. THE WIND SPEED FOR CITY IS 170 MPH AS REQUIRED
	BY SEC. 120 CITY AMENDMENTS NOT 168 MPH. REVISE
	ULTIMATE AND NOMINAL WIND LOADS ACCORDINGLY.

	4- SHEET S-0.01:
	A)ACCORDING TO TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THE
	COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES FOR WALLS AND
	ROOF ARE TOO LOW. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE ACTUAL
	CALCULATIONS.
	NOTE: COORDINATE WITH COMMENT (B) BELOW.

	B)ENGINEER SPECIFIED "PRESSURES ARE DERIVED FROM ASCE
	7-10". THE CURRENT ASCE REFERENCED IN THE 2020 FBC IS
	THE ASCE 7-16. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND COORDINATE WITH
	ITEM (A) ABOVE.

	C)REVISE ROOF DIAGRAM TO REFLECT THE REVISED ROOF ZONES
	ON CURRENT CODE FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	D)REVISE ROOF AND WALL DIMENSION OF THE END SECTION.
	ACCORDING TO FOOTNOTE "A" ON FIGURE R301.2(7)
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THE MINIMUM DIMENSION IS 4'-0".

	5- SHEET S-1.20:
	A)ENGINEER TO CLARIFY WHY USING WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTOR
	LSTA16 AT THE ENDS OF (3)2?X12? WOOD BEAM LOCATED
	BETWEEN THE EXISTING PITCHED ROOF AND THE PROPOSED FLAT
	ROOF. THIS CONNECTOR IS USUALLY USED FOR TENSION
	BETWEEN TWO WOOD MEMBERS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING
	IT WILL MEET ALL THE UPLIFT AND LATERAL LOADS. ALSO,
	PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SEC.
	107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	B) ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS A ?BUTT JOINT? WITH TENSION
	STRAP LAST16 CONNECTION ALONG THE SPAN OF THE (3)2?X12
	WOOD BEAM MENTIONED ABOVE. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
	DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED ?BUTT JOINT?
	SHOWING HOW THIS JOINT WILL SUPPORT ALL THE LIVE AND
	DEAD LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	C)ENGINEER IS SPECIFYING VTCR CONNECTORS TO RECEIVE
	EXISTING ROOF JOISTS RESTING ON THE OF (3)2?X12? WOOD
	BEAM. THESE CONNECTORS ARE VALLEY TRUSS CLIPS. ENGINEER
	TO PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW
	THESE CONNECTORS WILL WORK TO SUPPORT ALL THE LOADS AND
	PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION DETAILS. SEC. 107.2.1.2
	CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	D)ENGINEER TO SPECIFY CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS OF SINGLE
	2X12 JOISTS LOCATED BETWEEN (3)2?X12? WOOD BEAM AND
	INTERMEDIATE MASONRY WALL.
	ALSO, CLARIFY HOW DOUBLE 2X12 JOISTS AND THE SINGLE
	2X12 JOISTS WILL BE ANCHORED TO THE MASONRY WALL. SEC.
	107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	E)ENGINEER TO CLARIFY WHY SPECIFYING MASONRY TO WOOD
	CONNECTOR MTSM16 FOR ROOF JOISTS RESTING ON THE NEW
	(3)2X6 WOOD BEAM LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF
	THE ROOF PLAN. THERE IS NOT MASONRY WALL BELOW THIS
	BEAM. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	F) CROSS SECTION DETAIL 3/S2.01 SHOWN ON THE RIGHT HAND
	SIDE OF THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. THIS DETAIL SHOWS
	EXISTING BOTTOM CHORD TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED.
	ENGINEER TO PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW
	THE CONNECTION AT THE ROOF JOIST AND TOP OF MASONRY
	WALL IS REINFORCED

	G) SPECIFY SPACING OF CONNECTOR ?H? SPECIFIED ON THE
	BEAM & JOIST ANCHOR SCHEDULE FOR END JOISTS PARALLEL TO
	THE WALL BELOW.

	6- SHEET S-2.00:
	A)DETAIL 11 IS MISSING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TIE
	BEAM. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS. COORDINATE WITH
	TYPICAL MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL #7 ON SAME
	SHEET. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	B)SPECIFY HOW THE CONCRETE CAP SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 11
	IS ANCHORED TO THE TIE BEAM. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY
	AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	7- ENGINEER TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW
	COMPLYING WITH THE NEW 2020 CODE REQUIREMENT FOR
	ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. (PITCHED ROOF TO RECEIVE NEW
	METAL ROOFING) SEC. R905.1.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH METHOD OF SEC. R905.1.1.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL IS GOING TO BE USED. AND PROVIDE
	PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY F.A.C. 61G20-3.001.
	COORDINATE WITH TYPE OF ROOFING MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON
	PLANS.

	8 ENGINEER TO PROVIDE DOOR AND WINDOW STRUCTURAL BUCK
	DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY STRUCTURAL BUCK SIZE AND
	FASTENING.
	NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
	THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	9- BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS
	TO DEPICT THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. NEED TO
	SPECIFY INSULATION MATERIALS AND THEIR R-VALUES.(ROOF,
	WALLS, RAISED FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE, ETC.) AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THERE ARE FLAT ROOFS AND PITCHED
	ROOFS. AND, COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.

	10- ROOF WITH LESS THAN 6" EAVES REQUIRES GUTTERS WITH
	DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SPECIFY GUTTERS ON PLANS. PROVIDE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION OF DOWNSPOUTS.

	11- ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY ROOF PITCH AS REQUIRED
	BY SEC. R905.11.1 SLOPE.
	MODIFIED BITUMEN MEMBRANE ROOFS SHALL HAVE A DESIGN
	SLOPE OF NOT LESS THAN ONE-FOURTH UNIT VERTICAL IN 12
	UNITS HORIZONTAL (2-PERCENT SLOPE) FOR DRAINAGE

	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF VENTILATION AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY VENT
	SIZE AND LOCATION.
	NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING
	UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC.
	R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL

	13-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):

	A)METAL ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	B)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	C)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	D)INSWING ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.

	E)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS.

	F)FIXED WINDOWS.

	G) REAR SWING DOOR.

	H)SLIDING GLASS DOOR.

	14- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	15- BEDROOM #3 WINDOW W-11: PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S
	SPECS'S SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS
	OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO VERIFY CLEAR
	WIDTH OPENING ON SPECIFIED SIZE WITH 4 PANELS.

	16- NEED BATHROOM WITH MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRIVACY AND A
	DOOR THAT PROVIDES 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING AS REQUIRED
	BY SEC. R320.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: PLANS DON'T SPECIFY SIZE OF BATHROOM DOORS. NEED
	THIS INFORMATION.

	17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
	A)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
	INCLUDING OWNER NAME(NOT N/A), BUILDER NAME, PERMIT
	OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS IS JURISDICTION
	604700). SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM
	#9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND
	SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE:
	THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO
	BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	C)REVISE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 UNDER
	SPACES. OCCUPANTS WERE COUNTED TWICE. OCCUPANTS CAN NOT
	BE IN THE BEDROOM AND IN THE LIVING AREA AT THE SAME
	TIME. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	D) REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3. COORDINATE WITH
	ITEM (B) ABOVE.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.
	NOTE: TYPICALLY THE VENT RATIO (WHEN PROVIDED) IS AT
	LEAST 1/150.
	IF ENGINEER PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WANTS TO
	USE 1/300 VENT RATIO, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
	DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
	RATIO. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	E)WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION DON'T MATCH
	PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-
	ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	F)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL
	(EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
	HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE
	REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
	COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2023-03-09			Cont ID
Sent By	fgiaquin			Date	2023-03-09	Time	21:59	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fgiaquin			Date	2023-03-09	Time	21:56	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2022-12-07			Cont ID
Sent By	fgiaquin			Date	2022-12-07	Time	21:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fgiaquin			Date	2022-12-07	Time	21:36	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2022-06-23			Cont ID
Sent By	fgiaquin			Date	2022-06-23	Time	23:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fgiaquin			Date	2022-06-23	Time	20:07	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	8	Status	N	Date	2023-05-09			Cont ID
Sent By	lmarchan			Date	2023-05-09	Time	10:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmarchan			Date	2023-04-28	Time	16:56	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-28 13:04:52

VALUATION WAS REVISED. NEED TO VERIFY. JG.

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	7	Status	N	Date	2023-04-20			Cont ID
Sent By	aoliver			Date	2023-04-20	Time	08:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aoliver			Date	2023-04-19	Time	10:45	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	6	Status	N	Date	2023-04-19			Cont ID
Sent By	aoliver			Date	2023-04-19	Time	07:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aoliver			Date	2023-04-05	Time	08:40	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	5	Status	N	Date	2023-03-09			Cont ID
Sent By	fgiaquin			Date	2023-03-09	Time	21:59	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fgiaquin			Date	2023-02-23	Time	07:33	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	4	Status	N	Date	2023-01-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-26	Time	11:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-13	Time	09:02	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	3	Status	N	Date	2022-12-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	18:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-11-13	Time	18:23	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	2	Status	N	Date	2022-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:16	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-09-22	Time	09:54	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2022-07-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-06-06	Time	08:52	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	7	Status	P	Date	2023-04-26			Cont ID
Sent By	lmarchan			Date	2023-04-26	Time	14:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmarchan			Date	2023-04-17	Time	12:12	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-25 16:45:31	RECEIPT MU-2023-017159 - $1945.04 PAID
2023-04-17 12:13:07	EMAILED IMPACT FOR REVIEW AS PER JULIO GOMEZ-AO

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-04-11			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	11:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	11:18	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-11 11:18:33	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2023-03-07			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	16:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	16:42	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-07 16:42:21	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2023-01-25			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-25	Time	15:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-25	Time	15:17	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-25 15:17:17	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2022-12-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	18:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	18:07	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 18:07:24	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:16	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:16	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-18 15:16:29	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-07-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:40	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-27 18:42:02	IMPACT FEES
	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
	RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
	[email protected] .

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2022-06-16			Cont ID
Sent By	medwards			Date	2022-06-16	Time	16:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	medwards			Date	2022-06-16	Time	16:53	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2022-06-08			Cont ID
Sent By	rwbrown			Date	2022-06-08	Time	14:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rwbrown			Date	2022-06-08	Time	14:29	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	5	Status	N	Date	2023-04-11			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	11:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	11:19	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-11 11:19:38	NEED TO SUBMIT FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REVIEW.
	1-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADVISE IF
	SUBMITTING NOW OR IF SUBMITTING LATER AS DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL.):

	A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PRODUCTS ALREADY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD:
	(1) STEEL PANELS NOA 21-0506.08.
	(2) POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UNDERLAYMENT NOA 21-0602.14

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	4	Status	N	Date	2023-01-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-26	Time	11:23	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-26	Time	11:22	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-26 11:23:37	NEED TO SUBMIT FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REVIEW.
	1-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADVISE IF
	SUBMITTING NOW OR IF SUBMITTING LATER AS DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL.):

	A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PRODUCTS ALREADY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD:
	(1) STEEL PANELS NOA 21-0506.08.
	(2) POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UNDERLAYMENT NOA 21-0602.14

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	3	Status	N	Date	2022-12-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	14:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	14:24	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 14:26:38	NEED TO SUBMIT FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REVIEW.
	1-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADVISE IF
	SUBMITTING NOW OR IF SUBMITTING LATER AS DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL.):

	A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PRODUCTS ALREADY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD:
	(1) STEEL PANELS NOA 21-0506.08.
	(2) POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UNDERLAYMENT NOA 21-0602.14

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:11	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-18 15:12:47	ROOFING REVIEW:

	1-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADVISE IF
	SUBMITTING NOW OR IF SUBMITTING LATER AS DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL.):

	A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PRODUCTS ALREADY REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
	(1) STEEL PANELS NOA 21-0506.08.
	(2) POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UDERLAYMENT NOA 21-0602.14

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-07-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:42	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-27 18:43:39	ROOFING REVIEW

	1-PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS
	REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR:
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
	PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
	PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
	DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):

	A)METAL ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	B)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	C)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.

	2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	8	Status	P	Date	2023-04-19			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-19	Time	11:23	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-19	Time	11:23	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	7	Status	P	Date	2023-04-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-17	Time	11:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-17	Time	11:07	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-04-11			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	13:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-04-11	Time	11:12	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-11 13:22:50	SIGNATURE REVIEW

	1- THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON SOIL TEST REPORT UPLOADED
	TO PROJECTDOX ON 4/17/2023 IS INVALID. IT SHOW THAT THE
	DOCUMENT WAS UPDATED SINCE SIGNED. PROVIDE SOIL TEST
	REPORT WITH VALID VERIFIABLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE .
	ENGINEERS
	61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
	SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
	SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2023-03-07			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	16:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-07	Time	16:44	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-07 16:50:00	SIGNATURE REVIEW:

	1- REPEAT COMMENT: GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT HAVE A COPY OF
	THE ENGINEER SEAL AND SIGNATURE. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO
	HAVE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED
	BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS
	FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
	NOTE: SUBMIT REPORT WITH ENGINEER'S VERIFIABLE DIGITAL
	SIGNATURE.

	ENGINEERS
	61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
	SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
	SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2023-01-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-26	Time	11:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-01-25	Time	17:40	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-26 11:25:36	SIGNATURE REVIEW:

	1- GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER
	SEAL AND SIGNATURE. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE
	ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
	CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR
	PUBLIC RECORDS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2022-12-08			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	17:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-08	Time	17:48	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-08 17:54:03	SIGNATURE REVIEW:

	1- GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER
	SEAL AND SIGNATURE. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE
	ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
	CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR
	PUBLIC RECORDS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-10-18	Time	15:14	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-18 15:16:02	SIGNATURE REVIEW:

	1- GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER
	SEAL AND SIGNATURE. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE
	ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
	CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR
	PUBLIC RECORDS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-07-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-27	Time	18:12	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-27 18:47:36	SIGNATURE REVIEW:

	1- GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER
	SEAL AND SIGNATURE. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE
	ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
	CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR
	PUBLIC RECORDS.
2022-06-16 16:54:28	DIGITAL MECHANICAL SIGNATURES APPROVED ME

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	7	Status	P	Date	2023-05-08			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2023-05-08	Time	12:59	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2023-05-08	Time	12:59	Sent To

Notes

2023-05-08 13:01:31	5/8/2023
	PASSED


	THE CONSTRUCTION COST NNO LONGER TRIGGERS A LANDSCAPE
	PERMIT.


	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-04-18			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2023-04-18	Time	15:31	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2023-04-18	Time	15:31	Sent To

Notes

2023-04-18 15:33:26	FAILED
	4/18/2023
	REPEAT COMMENT
	THIS PERMIT WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD UNTIL A LANDSCAPE
	PERMIT IS IN THE SYSTEM.

	A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED
	THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($215,000) EXCEEDS 50% OF
	THE STRUCTURE'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE ($274,712) ACCORDING
	TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE,
	PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
	SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE
	SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
	INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES
	NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING
	APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND
	IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL
	TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY

	PLEASE REACH OUT TO SMITH AMISIAL WITH ANY LANDSCAPING
	QUESTIONS

	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2023-02-27			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2023-02-27	Time	13:58	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2023-02-27	Time	13:58	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-27 13:58:59	FAILED
	2/27/2023
	REPEAT COMMENT


	A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED
	THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($215,000) EXCEEDS 50% OF
	THE STRUCTURE'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE ($274,712) ACCORDING
	TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE,
	PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
	SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE
	SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
	INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES
	NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING
	APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND
	IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL
	TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY



	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2023-01-23			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2023-01-23	Time	13:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2023-01-23	Time	13:07	Sent To

Notes

2023-01-23 13:06:18	FAILED
	1/23/2023
	REPEAT COMMENTS

	PLEASE LABEL THE SETBACKS OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION ON
	SURVEY

	REAR SETBACK: 15 FEET OR TEN PERCENT OF LOT DEPTH,
	WHICHEVER IS LESS;
	SIDE SETBACK: FIVE FEET MINIMUM, 15 FEET TOTAL.

	A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED
	THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($215,000) EXCEEDS 50% OF
	THE STRUCTURE'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE ($274,712) ACCORDING
	TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE,
	PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
	SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE
	SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
	INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES
	NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING
	APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND
	IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL
	TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY



	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2022-11-21			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2022-11-21	Time	12:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2022-11-21	Time	12:42	Sent To

Notes

2022-11-21 12:44:31	11/21/2022
	FAILED

	PLEASE ADDRESS PREVIOUS COMMENT MADE.

	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	ASSOCIATE PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-10-04			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2022-10-04	Time	12:34	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2022-10-04	Time	12:34	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-04 12:39:21	FAILED
	10/4/2022

	NEEDS TO APPLY FOR A LANDSCAPE PERMIT


	THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($215,000) EXCEEDS 50% OF
	THE STRUCTURE'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE ($274,712) ACCORDING
	TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE,
	PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
	SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
	REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE
	SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A
	LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
	INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES
	NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING
	APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND
	IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL
	TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY


	PLEASE REACH OUT TO EITHER RAY OR SMITH ARE LANDSCAPE
	PLANNER

	RAY: 561-822-1443
	SMITH: 561-822-1562




	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	ASSOCIATE PLANNER
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2022-06-13			Cont ID
Sent By	asangele			Date	2022-06-13	Time	14:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	asangele			Date	2022-06-13	Time	14:25	Sent To

Notes

2022-06-13 14:28:09	6/13/2022
	FAIL
	PLEASE LABEL THE REAR AND SIDE SETBACK OF THE ADDITION
	ON SURVEY.

	REAR SETBACK: 15 FEET OR TEN PERCENT OF LOT DEPTH,
	WHICHEVER IS LESS;
	SIDE SETBACK: FIVE FEET MINIMUM, 15 FEET TOTAL.




	ALEXIS SANGELEER
	ASSOCIATE PLANNER
	[email protected]