Plan Review Details - Permit 22050876
Plan Review Stops For Permit 22050876
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-05-28 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-05-28 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-05-28 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-28 11:17:32ADDRESS APPROPRIATE FOR PROJECT.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-21 Time 19:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-21 Time 18:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-10-12 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-10-12 Time 19:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-10-11 Time 22:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-08-23 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-08-23 Time 23:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-08-23 Time 22:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-08 Time 18:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-08 Time 18:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-06-09 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-06-09 Time 19:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-06-09 Time 19:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-06-17 Time 13:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-17 13:32:45ENGINEERING REVIEW COMPLETED UNDER WCF ROW 21120302
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-21 Time 19:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-15 Time 09:02 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2022-11-30 Time 09:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2022-10-06 Time 08:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-09-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-09-24 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-08-18 Time 07:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-06-23 Time 15:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-06-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-06-22 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-05-23 Time 06:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-21 Time 19:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2022-11-30 Time 09:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2022-11-30 Time 09:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-30 09:22:31FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 7TH ED
 NFPA 70 2017 EDITION
  
 JAKE LEAHY
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 PLANS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD
  
 THESE PLANS ARE COPIES.
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-09-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-09-24 Time 07:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-09-24 Time 07:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 11:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 11:06 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 11:16:04THE SHEETS THAT ARE DIGITALLY SIGNED BY ALEXANDER
 ABERNATHY, P.E. ARE SELF-CERTIFIED. THE ENGINEER'S
 DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON THE DRAWINGS IS SELF-CERTIFIED.
 THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS REQUIRES
 ENGINEERS TO USE AN APPROVED THIRD PARTY AGENCY TO
 CERTIFY THEIR SIGNATURES. FS 471 & FAC 61G15
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-06-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-06-22 Time 09:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-06-22 Time 09:06 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-12-20 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-12-20 Time 15:32 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-12-20 Time 15:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-12-14 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-11-29 Time 16:59 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-11-29 Time 13:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-29 16:59:55THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-09-21 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-09-21 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-21 11:30:50FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120302) MUST BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS
 ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED
 WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THE COMMENTS
 BELOW MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED WITH THE WCF ROW REVIEW.
  
 2) THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES FOR THE FINAL
 POLE LOCATION HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED ON THE SITE PLAN
 AND SURVEY. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CORRECT COORDINATES.
  
 3) THE NEW SURVEY THAT CORRECTLY CALLS OUT THE
 28-FOOT-TALL POLE WAS NOT UPLOADED.
  
 4) THE RELOCATED HANDHOLE BY THE POWER DRAW POLE ON
 SHEET P-1 CORRECTLY ADDRESSES THE LAST SET OF COMMENTS
 (NOTE: SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE RESTORED TO CITY STANDARDS
 AT THIS LOCATION). THE UPLOAD FOR THIS SHEET LOCATION
 INCLUDED THE ENTIRE JOB PACKAGE. PLEASE ONLY UPLOAD
 SHEET P-1 UNDER THE P-1 TAB. ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS
 THAT EVERY SHEET IN THE PACKAGE HAS A NEW "LATEST
 REVISION DATE" AND A NEW ENGINEER OF RECORD SIGNING.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF EACH
 SHEET IS UPLOADED. THIS DID NOT OCCUR IN ALL INSTANCES.
  
 5) THE RAYCAP POLE DESIGN PACKAGE IN THE SUPPORTING
 DOCUMENTS SECTION IS FOR A 38-FOOT TALL POLE NOT THE
 28-FOOT POLE INCLUDED WITH THE WCF ROW OR IN THE
 ELEVATION DRAWINGS. PLEASE UPLOAD THE 28-FOOT POLE
 DESIGN PACKAGE (WHICH IS INCLUDED WITH THE WCF ROW
 PERMIT).
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-01 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-01 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-01 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 13:27:59FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120302) MUST BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS
 ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED
 WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THE COMMENTS
 BELOW MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED WITH THE WCF ROW REVIEW.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLE AND THE
 INSTALL EXCAVATION SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE POLE SUPPLYING
 POWER WILL DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING LARGE
 STREET TREE IF INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET
 P-1. THE HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS
 LOCATION. *** THE EXCAVATION PIT CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN
 LESS THEN 5 FEET FROM THE TREE, WHICH IS TOO CLOSE. IT
 NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE
 SIZE OF THE TREE, IF THE HANDHOLE WILL BE LOCATED
 WITHIN THE GRASS AREA. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE HANDHOLE
 BE INSTALLED UNDER THE SIDEWALK SO THAT IT, AND THE
 EXCAVATION, ARE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE TREE AND IN AN
 AREA THAT TYPICALLY SEES LESS ROOT ZONE EXPANSION.
  
 3) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP
 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-06-17 Time 13:30 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-06-17 Time 11:42 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-17 13:31:41FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120302) MUST BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS
 ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED
 WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THE COMMENTS
 BELOW MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED WITH THE WCF ROW REVIEW.
  
 2) THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS FAIL TO SHOW TWO
 PALM TREES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BULB OUT WHERE
 THE POLE IS PROPOSED. PLEASE SHOW THE TREES IN THEIR
 ACCURATE LOCATIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE
 IS NO CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED POLE.
  
 3) THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THAT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED
 SO AS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 AND HAVE EQUAL SETBACK DISTANCES WITH EXISTING POLES
 FROM THE CURBLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED
 POLE IS NOT SHOWN IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING LIGHT POLES
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE IN THIS LOCATION. THE EXISTING
 LIGHT POLES ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK (A
 GOOGLE STREETVIEW SCREENSHOT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
 CHRISTINA WARR). PLEASE ADJUST THE PROPOSED POLE
 LOCATION ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4) THE ADJACENT LOT IS IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY
 CODE REQUIREMENT THAT DOES NOT PERMIT WIRELESS
 FACILITIES TO BE PLACED IN FRONT OF A RESIDENTIAL
 STRUCTURE, THE PROPOSED POLE NEEDS TO BE MOVED SOUTH
 WITHIN THE BULB OUT. STAFF HAS PROVIDED CHRISTINA WARR
 WITH THE SITE PLAN SHOWING THE SETBACK OF THE RESIDENCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE STATE STREET SIDEWALK SO THAT THE
 POLE LOCATION CAN BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5) THE BORE PIT AND HANDHOLE NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE
 THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THESE ARE
 LOCATED ONLY WITHIN THE PARKWAY WHICH WILL NEED
 RESTORATION. PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 6) THE LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLE AND THE INSTALL
 EXCAVATION SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE POLE SUPPLYING POWER
 WILL DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING LARGE
 STREET TREE IF INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET
 P-1. THE HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 7) THE POLE HEIGHT SHOWN ON SHEET C-3 LISTS THE HEIGHT
 TO THE TOP OF THE ANTENNA AS 28 FEET ABOVE GRADE;
 HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN, SURVEY AND THE RAYCAP POLE SPEC
 PAGES CALL OUT A POLE 38 FEET ABOVE GRADE LEVEL. ALL
 SHEETS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION.
 NOTE: THE 38-FOOT HEIGHT IS CONSISTENT WITH ONE OF THE
 NEARBY POWER POLES.
  
 8) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING UTILITIES AND TREE ROOTS.
  
 9) THE PLANS SHOW THE COM LINES WITHIN 2-FEET OF THE
 BORE PIT(S). IN ORDER TO VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION
 WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITIES,
 PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM
 THE COM PROVIDER(S), MOST LIKELY AT&T OR COMCAST.
  
 10) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved