| 2022-04-12 19:01:05 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22020124 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | ***IMPORTANT*** |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE OWNER |
| | OR AUTHORIZED AGENT BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- ADDRESS SHOWN ON ALL PLANS (540 17TH ST) DOESN'T |
| | CORRESPOND TO THE ASSIGNED ADDRESS TO LOT 23 ON BLOCK |
| | 10. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 545 LILAC CT. REVISE ADDRESS ON |
| | ALL PLANS AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THIS ALSO APPLIES TO THE SURVEY AND DRAINAGE PLAN |
| | DRAWING C-1. |
| | |
| | 2-ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING SPECIFIED ON SHEET S-2 |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- GABLE END UPLIFT DIAGRAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH ROOF ZONES ZONES SPECIFIED ON FIGURE R301.2(7) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| | COMPLYING WITH THE NEW 2020 CODE REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SEC. R905.1.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH METHOD OF SEC. R905.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL IS GOING TO BE USED. AND PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY F.A.C. 61G20-3.001 |
| | |
| | 5-DETAIL 3 ON SHEET A-3 IS MISSING SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | THE WALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. |
| | A)NEED TO SPECIFY WALL SHEATHING AND FASTENING. SEC. |
| | R703.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) NEED TO SPECIFY STUCCO BASE (LATH OR ANY OTHER |
| | STUCCO BASE) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND TABLE R702.1(1) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C)NEED TO SPECIFY TWO WATER RESISTIVE BARRIERS WHEN |
| | STUCCO IS APPLIED TO WOOD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.7.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | D)NEED TO SPECIFY THE MIN. STUCCO THICKNESS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R703.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND TABLE R702.1(1) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6- WIND DESIGN INFORMATION ON SHEET A-1 IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | ULTIMATE WIND SPEED AND NOMINAL WIND SPEED UNDER WALL |
| | PRESSURES DON'T MATCH THE ULTIMATE WIND SPEED AND |
| | NOMINAL WIND SPEED UNDER WIND DESIGN BASIS SHOWN ON THE |
| | SAME SHEET. REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. WHICH ONE IS |
| | THE CORRECT DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THIS HOUSE? SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTES: (A)REVISE WINDOWS/DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ACCORDINGLY TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | (B)COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH WIND DESIGN INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET S-2(INCLUDING BUILDING EXPOSURE)TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | (A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | CERTIFIED AT THE BOTTOM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)ROOF TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | THIS IS A HIP ROOF. REVISE AS REQUIRED. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C)WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | D) THERE ARE NO WINDOWS ON THE WEST SIDE FOR THIS |
| | HOUSE. BATHROOM WINDOW IS ON THE EAST SIDE. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 8- PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NOA 17-1212.21 SUBMITTED EXPIRED |
| | ON DECEMBER 27,2021. NEED CURRENT NOA. |
| | |
| | B)THERMA-TRU ENTRY AND REAR SWING DOOR. FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL8871 SUBMITTED IS FOR THE PREVIOUS CODE |
| | CYCLE. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL. ALSO, |
| | DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING |
| | THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| | CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT SHOWS IF |
| | PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT. CHAPTER |
| | 553 F.S. |
| | |
| | 9-PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW/APPROVAL. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVISE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTAL AFFIDAVIT (SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS) ON |
| | SHEET A-1: |
| | A)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS NOA DOESN'T MATCH NOA SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #8(A) ABOVE TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | B)THERMA-TRU ENTRY AND REAR SWING DOOR FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #8(B) ABOVE TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | C)ROOF HIP AND RIDGE NOA DOESN'T MATCH NOA SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 10- DRAINAGE PLAN DRAWING C-1: |
| | A) REVISE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AT THE REAR AND LEFT HAND |
| | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. SURFACE DRAINAGE CAN NOT BE |
| | DIVERTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. DRAINAGE WATER TO BE |
| | KEPT WITHIN THE LOT OR DIVERTED TOWARDS THE STREET. |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | AND SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)PARCEL ID AND STREET ADDRESS ARE INCORRECT. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 1107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11-VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. |
| | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS |
| | UPDATED TO $191938.00. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS |
| | $3524.99. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |