| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21121206 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-04-12 |
Time |
08:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-04-12 |
Time |
08:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-12 08:39:13 | APPLICANT IDENTIFIED THAT THE WORK IS TO BE DONE AT | | | 4850 RYNA GREENBAUM DR WITH THE PCN OF | | | 74424312290020010, UPDATED PERMIT WITH THE CORRECT | | | ADDRESS AND PCN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-09 13:46:01 | THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A SITE PLAN, CAN YOU PLEASE | | | INDICATE WHERE ON THE SITE THE WORK IS TO BE DONE. | | | | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6659 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-05 11:21:49 | 4850 LORING DR IS NO LONGER A VALID ADDRESS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A SITE PLAN FOR THE WHOLE PARCEL, SHOWING THE | | | EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE EMAIL | | | [email protected] OR CALL 561-805-6659 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-26 13:22:17 | SHUFFLE BOARD | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | | AMENDMENT | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) PLEASE CIRCLE THE LOCATION OF THE SCHUFFLEBOARD | | | COURT ON THE PROVIDED SURVEY. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE PATH TO THE SCHUFFLEBOARD | | | COURT FBC A 206.2.2 WITHIN A SITE. | | | AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL CONNECT ACCESSIBLE | | | BUILDINGS, ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES, ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS, | | | AND ACCESSIBLE SPACES THAT ARE ON THE SAME SITE. | | | AND SHOW THAT THE PATH MEETS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE | | | REQUIREMENTS FBC A 402 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
10:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-01-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-01-06 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-06 13:48:06 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) THERE IS AN INDICATION WITHIN THE APPLICATION OF NEW | | | PICKLEBALL COURTS. | | | | | | THE ATTACHED SURVEY AND LETTER INDICATE SHUFFLEBOARD. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR PROVIDE GREATER DETAIL PER | | | THE APPLICATION FOR NEW PICKLEBALL COURTS. | | | | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-05-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-05-07 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
12:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-07 |
Time |
06:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
17:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-03-08 |
Time |
07:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-02-10 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
Time |
06:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-05-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-05-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-05 12:40:37 | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED PLANS DETAILED WITH ATITLE | | | BLOCK FOR COTLEUR &HEARING LANSCAPE ARCHITECTS DOES NOT | | | HAVE THE REQUIRED SEAL AND SIGNATURE. PLEASE CORRECT | | | THEE ISSUES AS OUTLINED BELOW. | | | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | | SIGNED. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | | [email protected] | | | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-15 09:32:08 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) ALL OF THE DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE | | | DESIGNER - DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED IN | | | ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
Time |
13:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-01-26 |
Time |
13:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-05-04 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-05-04 |
Time |
12:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-30 14:21:57 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS | | | PERMIT, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO | | | AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. NO TREES MAY BE | | | RELOCATED UNTIL THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS ISSUED. | | | ***** THIS IS NOT INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT BUT | | | RATHER A SEPARATE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | THE COURT ITSELF COMPLIES. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-02-10 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-02-10 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-10 10:49:17 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE PERMIT APPLICATION STATES THAT THIS IS FOR A | | | PICKLEBALL COURT, YET THE PLANS SHOW A SHUFFLEBALL | | | COURT. CORRECT YOUR PERMIT APPLICATION.TO LIST THE | | | CORRECT SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE HIGHLIGHT WHERE THE LOCATION IS ON THE | | | OVERALL SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE BUILDING TO THE EDGE | | | OF THE SHUFFLEBOARD COURT ON SHEET 1 OF 1. | | | | | | 4) PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT, A TREE | | | ALTERATION PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | | THE PLANNING DIVISION. NO TREES MAY BE RELOCATED UNTIL | | | THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS ISSUED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|