|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 21120303
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21120303 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-27 11:45:06 | 1) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR | | | AS-BUILT INFORMATION. PLEASE INCLUDE AS-BUILT | | | INFORMATION IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED UNDERGROUND | | | ELECTRIC SHOWING ALL CROSSING DATA FOR OTHER UTILITIES. | | | 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE | | | REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD. | | | | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1075 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-17 12:57:33 | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE | | | 12/6/2021 | | | | | | 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION, | | | CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS | | | FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA | | | EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE | | | EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT. | | | | | | 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED | | | APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL | | | GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO | | | UPLOAD YOUR PLANS. | | | | | | 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF | | | POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT, | | | UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE | | | SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE | | | DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eshneide |
Date |
2022-03-07 |
Time |
17:10 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-03-07 |
Time |
17:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-07 17:10:30 | INSUFFICIENT | | | | | | 1) THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | 2) THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE HEIGHT OF A LIGHT POLE | | | AT 12.3 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED | | | WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. PER CITY CODE THIS WILL NOT | | | PERMIT THE PROPOSED 32-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS FACILITY | | | POLE. THERE APPEARS TO BE A NEARBY POWER POLE THAT IS | | | TALLER THAN THE LABELED POLE. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT | | | DIMENSION SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED | | | WIRELESS FACILITY POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT | | | ALLOWANCE. | | | | | | 3) SHEET C-3 SHOWS THE POLE AT 28 FEET IN HEIGHT. THIS | | | CONFLICTS WITH BOTH THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN HEIGHTS OF | | | 32 FEET. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 4) THE HANDHOLE AND BORE PIT NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE | | | THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THERE IS | | | ALSO PARKWAY AND POSSIBLY CURBING THAT WILL ALSO NEED | | | RESTORATION. PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC | | | WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH | | | EXISTING UTILITIES. | | | | | | 6) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE | | | COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC | | | GREY A. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
