|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 21120301
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21120301 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-02-17 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-02-17 |
Time |
13:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-17 13:28:00 | 1) PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IS ON TOP OF A GAS MAIN. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE GAS COMPANY ALLOWING | | | THE PLACEMENT OF THE POLE. | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-23 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-23 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-23 16:55:19 | 1) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS. | | | INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT | | | JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT | | | INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2) PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC | | | SHOWING ALL CROSSING DATA FOR OTHER UTILITIES. | | | 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE | | | REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD. | | | 4) PLEASE ADD STREET NAMES TO PROPOSED ELECTRIC PLAN | | | | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1075 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2023-02-27 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2023-01-11 |
Time |
07:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-06-24 |
Time |
07:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-17 15:45:24 | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE | | | 12/6/2021 | | | | | | 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION, | | | CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS | | | FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA | | | EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE | | | EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT. | | | | | | 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED | | | APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL | | | GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO | | | UPLOAD YOUR PLANS. | | | | | | 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF | | | POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT, | | | UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE | | | SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE | | | DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-02-24 |
Time |
15:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-02-24 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-02-24 15:04:40 | 1. CONCRETE CAISSON IS SHOWN ON SURVEY TO CONFLICT WITH | | | EXISTING GAS LINE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PUBLIC | | | UTILITY LETTER GRANTING APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSED POLE | | | LOCATION AND DEPTH. | | | | | | 2. PROPOSED BORE PITS AND HANDHOLE APPEAR TO BE TOO | | | CLOSE TO EXISTING PALM TREES, PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSION | | | OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXCAVATION WORK AND TREES. | | | RECOMMENDED AT LEAST 5 FT. CLEARANCE FROM PALMS TO | | | SAFELY PROVIDE A BUFFER TO THE ROOT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 4. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN, HEIGHT, AND COLOR MEETS | | | CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | (561)822-1426 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-01-03 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-01-03 |
Time |
13:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-03 13:29:06 | 1. SITE SURVEY (B-1) REFERENCES OVERHEAD WOODEN | | | DISTRIBUTION POLES THAT NO LONGER EXIST WITHIN CURRENT | | | STREET VIEW/SITE CONDITIONS, CANNOT REFERENCE OR | | | UTILIZE THESE POLES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE HEIGHT OF | | | THE ANTENNA POLE. ANTENNA POLE HEIGHT AND COLOR SHALL | | | BE ANALOGOUS TO THE EXISTING DECORATIVE CITY STREET | | | LAMPS. | | | | | | 2. CONCRETE CAISSON IS SHOWN ON SURVEY TO CONFLICT WITH | | | EXISTING GAS LINE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PUBLIC | | | UTILITY LETTER GRANTING APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSED POLE | | | LOCATION AND DEPTH. | | | | | | 3. PROPOSED BORE PITS AND HANDHOLE ARE TOO CLOSE TO | | | EXISTING PALM TREES, PLEASE ADJUST TO PROVIDE THE | | | NECESSARY SPACING TO PROTECT ROOT/TREE VIABILITY. | | | RECOMMENDED AT LEAST 8 FT. CLEARANCE FROM PALMS TO | | | SAFELY PROVIDE A BUFFER TO THE ROOT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 4. UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL VARIES BETWEEN SURVEY (B-1) | | | AND PROPOSED POWER ROUTE (P-1), CONFIRM/VALIDATE FINAL | | | ELECTRIC ROUTE. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION SHOWING THE | | | DEPTH OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. | | | | | | 6. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN MEETS CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY @ (561)822-1426 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |