| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21110524 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-11-15 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-11-15 |
Time |
12:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-15 12:48:53 | ADDRESS APPROVED FOR PROJECT |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2022-02-01 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-01 16:47:44 | TUES. FEB. 01/2022 | | | ACTION: PASSED/ BUILDING PROVISO | | | WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS. THIS BUILDING CONTAINS | | | EITHER BOLTED AND OR WELDED CONNECTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR | | | IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WELD PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS & | | | WELDER OPERATOR PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION RECORDS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE REFERENCED STANDARDS AT TIME OF | | | INSPECTION FOR FIELD WIELDING, ON THE JOB-SITE | | | WIELDING. THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | THE OWNER MAY JUST HIRE A 3RD PARTY ENGINEERING FIRM TO | | | COMPLETE AND APPROVE THE FORMER INSPECTIONS. REPORTS | | | SUBMITTED TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING | | | INSPECTION. | | | 2020 FBC-B 2204.1 WELDING | | | 1. WELD PROCEDURES SPECIFICATIONS | | | 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF WELDING PERSONAL | | | 2017 FBC-B 2204.2 BOLTING. | | | IF FURTHER CLARIFICATION AND OR QUESTIONS IS REQUIRED, | | | PLEASE CONTACT THE CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR KEN CONRAD | | | AT 561-805-6666 OR ACTING CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR | | | RICHARD BRUNELLE AT 561-805-6670. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
Time |
11:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-15 13:42:35 | WEST PALM BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-CONSTRUCTION | | | SERVICES/ BUILDING DIVISION | | | 2020 FBC- BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | W. P. B. PERMIT:21110524 | | | W. P. B. MASTER: 21071035 | | | ADD: 700 S. ROSEMARY AVE. # 232 | | | CONT: TBD/ TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: 561-414-2190 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2020 WEST PALM BEACH | | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION | | | | | | 2020 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. 801.3 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | DATE: WED. DEC. 15TH/ 2021 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE FOR CITY PLACE | | | REQUIRE CITY PLACE MANAGEMENT STAMP OF REVIEW AND | | | APPROVAL BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE CAN OCCUR. 107.2.1.2. | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2) THE COVERSHEET LIST THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AS 9 FT. | | | THIS IS ON THE 2ND FLOOR, THE 2ND FLOOR JUST TO THE | | | NORTH OF THIS LOCATION IS HIGH ENOUGH THAT THE 2ND | | | FLOOR DECK ACTUALLY PASSES OVER THE STREET BELOW. | | | PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATION AND HEIGHT MULTIPLIERS FOR | | | PRESSURES. | | | | | | 3) WELDING ON JOBSITE. WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS. | | | THIS BUILDING CONTAINS EITHER BOLTED AND OR WELDED | | | CONNECTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WELD | | | PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS & WELDER OPERATOR PERFORMANCE | | | QUALIFICATION RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REFERENCED | | | STANDARDS AT TIME OF INSPECTION FOR FIELD WIELDING, ON | | | THE JOB-SITE WIELDING. THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. | | | THE OWNER MAY JUST HIRE A 3RD PARTY ENGINEERING FIRM TO | | | COMPLETE AND APPROVE THE FORMER INSPECTIONS. REPORTS | | | SUBMITTED TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING | | | INSPECTION. | | | 2020 FBC-B 2204.1 WELDING | | | 1. WELD PROCEDURES SPECIFICATIONS | | | 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF WELDING PERSONAL | | | 2017 FBC-B 2204.2 BOLTING. | | | IF FURTHER CLARIFICATION AND OR QUESTIONS IS REQUIRED, | | | PLEASE CONTACT THE CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR KEN CONRAD | | | AT 561-805-6666 OR ACTING CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR | | | RICHARD BRUNELLE AT 561-805-6670. | | | | | | 4) SHEETS S-04 AND OR A-06 (SCREENS). THERE IS NO | | | INFORMATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 2020 FBC-B SECTION | | | 3105.3.4.1. FABRIC USED FOR AWNINGS OR FABRIC COVERED | | | FRAMES SHALL MEET THE FLAME PROPAGATION PERFORMANCE | | | CRITERIA OF NFPA 701 OR HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT | | | GREATER THAN 25 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E84 | | | OR UL 723. | | | | | | 5A) RIGID FRAME AWNINGS/ BREAK AWAY FABRIC. FBC-B | | | 3105.4.2.1. DESIGN. THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY | | | FABRIC OR MEMBRANE-COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A | | | QUICK REMOVAL OR BREAKAWAY MEMBRANE OR FABRIC AT WIND | | | VELOCITIES OF 75 MPH, SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING | | | CRITERIA: | | | 1) MINIMUM WIND SPEED OF 105 MPH | | | 2) EXPOSURES B, C, OR D AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER 16. | | | | | | 5B) RIGID AWNING. PERMANENT OR NON-REMOVABLE FABRIC. | | | FBC-B 3105.4.2.2. THE WIND DESIGN LOADS FOR ANY FABRIC | | | OR MEMBRANE COVERED STRUCTURE DESIGNED WITH A PERMANENT | | | OR NON-REMOVABLE FABRIC OR MEMBRANE, SHALL BE BASED ON | | | THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: | | | 1) MINIMUM WIND SPEED VELOCITY AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER | | | 16 USING FIGURE 1609.3(3) 150 VULT, CATEGORY 1 | | | BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 6) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE WITH THE LACK OF INFORMATION FOR THIS | | | REVIEW, SUBSEQUENT REMARKS MAYBE MADE IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW CYCLE. | | | | | | AUGUST 02ND/ 2021 ALL PLANS EXAMINERS WILL BE WORKING | | | FROM CITY HALL. | | | MY WORK HOURS ARE USUALLY TUES. & WED. 7:30 AM- 4:30 PM | | | PART-TIME/ RETIRED. | | | | | | IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK WITH A PLANS EXAMINER BEFORE I GET | | | BACK INTO THE OFFICE CALL | | | (561)805-6700 AND ASK FOR THE PLANS EXAMINER ON-CALL. | | | THANK YOU. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402 | | | TEL: 561-805-6717 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-31 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-07 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-31 14:46:49 | 4/7/22 CLIENT DIRECTED ME TO SPECS IN SUBMITTAL THAT I | | | MISSED, CHANGED THE RESULT TO PASS. MP | | | | | | ELECTRIC REVIEW FAILED | | | 1) IT APPEARS USING THE RATINGS GIVEN, 280 WATTS , 2.33 | | | AMPS, THAT MOTORS DETAILED ON PLAN E-01 AS LOW VOLTAGE, | | | ARE 120-VOLT. PLEASE DETAIL AN NEC COMPLIANT WIRING | | | METHOD TO PROTECT THESE CONDUCTORS FEEDING THESE | | | MOTORS. FBC 107.2 | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH ED. | | | FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020 | | | 7TH EDITION | | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 | | | 7TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | V/R, | | | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6746 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-02-09 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2022-02-09 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-09 12:31:49 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 7TH ED | | | NFPA 70 2017 EDITION | | | | | | JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | | 561-805-6713 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 1) SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGN. | | | | | | 2) WHERE DOES THE POWER COME FROM FOR AWNING AND SIGN? | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A DIAGRAM SHOWING LOCATION OF PANELS. | | | 215.5 | | | | | | 3) UF CABLE HOW IS IT GOING TO BE RUN ON AWNING? | | | EXPOSED, IN CONDUIT??? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-23 16:43:21 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 7TH ED | | | NFPA 70 2017 EDITION | | | | | | JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | | 561-805-6713 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | NO ELECTRICAL LAYOUT SHOWN JLEAHY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-03-14 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-03-14 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-14 10:58:55 | FIRE PROVISO: | | | | | | FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ANY WORK ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER, INCLUDING DEMO, | | | SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS & SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-01-31 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2022-01-31 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-31 12:05:28 | FIRE PROVISO: | | | | | | FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ANY WORK ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER, INCLUDING DEMO, | | | SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS & SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-11-16 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-11-16 |
Time |
10:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-16 11:05:01 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A SITE PLAN, SHOWING THE | | | EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED AND HOW IT RELATES TO | | | EXTING SIDWALKS OR NEARBY STRUCTURES. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED SITE PLAN. | | | | | | | | | 1A) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE INTENDED USE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE INTENDED USE/OCCUPANCY OF THE | | | PROPOSED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE FABRIC TYPE NOR FLAME | | | RETARDANT CERTIFICATION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | | | | | | | 3) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION | | | BEING ADDED TO PROTECT THIS STRUCTURE. | | | | | | THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS PROVIDED WITH FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION WHICH MUST BE EXTENDED INTO A PERMANAT | | | ATTACHED STRUCTURE. | | | | | | PER NFPA 43 | | | | | | 43.5 MODIFICATIONS | | | | | | 43.5.1.3 NEWLY CONSTRUCTED ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, AND | | | SYSTEMS SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS | | | CODE APPLICABLE | | | TO NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION OR | | | JUSTIFY WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE EXTENDED USING NARRATIVE | | | AND SPECIFIC FIRE CODE REFERENCES. | | | | | | | | | | | | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2022-04-29 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2022-03-13 |
Time |
08:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-02-25 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-01-28 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2022-04-29 |
Time |
11:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2022-04-29 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-02-25 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-02-25 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-25 16:05:04 | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED | | | 1) DRAWINGS LOCATED IN THE SIGNATURE FILE HAVE PASSED | | | SIGNATURE. DRAWING E-01 UPLOADED 1/27/22 APPEARS TO BE | | | A COPY OF A DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWING. PLEASE | | | CORRECT AS OUTLINED BELOW | | | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | | SIGNED. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | | [email protected] | | | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-30 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-30 08:41:51 | IT APPEARS ALL DRAWINGS ARE COPIES/SCANS OF ENGINEERED, | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS. COPIES OR SCANS | | | OF DOCUMENTS WITH ENGINEERS DIGITAL SIGNATURES CANNOT | | | BE CERTIFIED USING SIGNATURE, CERTIFYING, SOFTWARE. | | | PLANS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLEASE FOLLOW THE | | | DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT THIS ISSUE. | | | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | | SIGNED. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | | [email protected] | | | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-04-28 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
17:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-28 15:34:52 | PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL (104) INSPECTION FOR | | | THE PERGOLA PERMIT, REVISED DRAWINGS, SHOWING THE FINAL | | | PERGOLA PLANS, INCLUDING SECTIONS AND FLOOR PLAN SHEET | | | A201, MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AS A REVISION TO | | | PERMIT 21071035. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-24 15:49:12 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS HOW | | | THE SUPPORT POSTS MEET THE GROUND IN RELATIONSHIP TO | | | THE RAILING, WALKWAY AND SEATING. THE SUBMITTED PLANS | | | SEEM TO CONFLICT WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | RESTAURANT BUILDOUT. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS. ****THE | | | SUPPORT POSTS SHOWN IN THE SECTION DRAWING ARE NOT AT | | | THE EDGE OF THE SLAB, BUT RATHER INSET. THIS CONFLICTS | | | WITH THE POST LOCATIONS ON THE BUILDOUT SITE PLAN.**** | | | | | | 2) THE SIGNS REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS WITH PLANS AND | | | HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS PERMIT. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | THE ROSEMARY SQUARE SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT PERMIT EXPOSED | | | WIRES, CONDUIT, J BOXES, ETC. LEADING TO THE SIGN, SO | | | THE PERGOLA MUST BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE CONCEALMENT | | | IF SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED ATTACHED TO IT IN ANY WAY. | | | | | | 3) NO PART OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE IS PERMITTED AS PART | | | OF THIS PERMIT. THIS INCLUDES BACKING, SUPPORT | | | STRUCTURES, TUBING, ETC. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eshneide |
Date |
2021-12-29 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-12-29 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-29 16:49:06 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE RETAIL MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS | | | REQUIRED ON THE PLANS. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY PROVIDE A | | | LETTER FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL MANAGEMENT WHICH APPROVES | | | THE SPECIFIC PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS HOW THE SUPPORT POSTS | | | MEET THE GROUND IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE RAILING, WALKWAY | | | AND SEATING. THE SUBMITTED PLANS SEEM TO CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE RESTAURANT BUILDOUT. | | | INCLUDE DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | 3) STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WHEN ITEM 2 IS | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|