| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21101412 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
Time |
13:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-27 10:51:33 | LIGHT POLES | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | | AMENDMENT | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED LIGHT POLE DETAILS | | | FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHOWING THE FOUNDATION AND | | | ATTACHMENTS TO COMPLY WITH THE WIND LOADS - FBC 1609 | | | | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW THE WIND DESIGN DATA USED FOR THE WIND | | | DESIGN PER FBC 1603.1.4 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-12-16 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-12-16 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-16 |
Time |
07:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-15 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
Time |
08:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-01-27 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
Time |
07:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
11:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-02-17 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-17 11:01:47 | THIRD SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | 1- ONLY DRAWING S201 HAVE AN ORIGINAL DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURE. DRAWINGS A0.1, E0.1, E1.1, E2.4 AND E3.0 | | | NEED THE ARCHITECT'S AND ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. | | | SEE COPY OF ORIGINAL COMMENT BELOW. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) ALL OF THE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | IN ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
Time |
08:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-04 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-04 08:17:59 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) ALL OF THE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | IN ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-27 10:55:15 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) ALL OF THE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | IN ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-12-15 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-15 14:22:14 | ZONING APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE | | | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE | | | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTSRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309.A.] | | | | | | | | | ** REFERENCE: MASTER PERMIT #20090083 ** |
|
|