Plan Review Details - Permit 21090499
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21090499
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-09-30 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2021-09-30 Time 16:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-09-30 Time 16:51 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-30 16:51:57ADDRESS APPROVED FOR SFH
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 14:35 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-08 15:56:03BUILDING AUDIT OK.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 10:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-03-07 Time 13:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-08 13:10:53NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD AUDIT.
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21090499
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS AUDIT:
 1- PROPOSED DRAINAGE & SITE PLAN ON SHEET SP-1:
 BASED ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED
 DRAINAGE PLAN THIS LOT WILL HAVE FINISH GRADE
 ELEVATIONS A COUPLE OF FEET (3 FEET +/-) HIGHER THAN
 EXISTING GRADES. PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN IS INCOMPLETE.
 IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWING HOW THIS
 ELEVATED SOIL WILL BE SUPPORTED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. ALSO, THE HOUSE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN DON'T
 MATCH.
 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 RETAINING WALLS. ALSO, KEEP IN CONSIDERATION THAT THERE
 IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE NORTH WEST SIDE OF THIS
 LOT. COORDINATE WITH THE PERTINENT UTILITY TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (1)REVISED DRAINAGE & SITE PLAN DOESN'T SHOW LOCATION
 OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 (2)LOCATION OF THE RETAINING WALL IS NOT SHOWN.
 TYPICALLY, THE RETAINING WALL IS LOCATED NEXT TO THE
 PROPERTY LINES. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN THE PROPOSED
 RETAINING WALL DETAIL IS SHOWING A FOOTING ENCROACHING
 INTO THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. REVISE/CLARIFY AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 (3)RETAINING WALL DETAIL DOESN'T REFLECT A RETAINING
 WALL. THE GRADE ELEVATION IS THE SAME ON BOTH SIDES OF
 THE WALL. REVISE THE DETAIL AS REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE
 ACTUAL PROPOSED CONDITIONS, INCLUDING THE GRADE
 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY PROPOSED
 WALL HEIGHT.
 SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 (4)BOUNDARY SURVEY & SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOW A 12 FOOT
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
 APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL BY THE
 PERTINENT ENTITIES (NPBCID AND THE POA) WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 (5)BOUNDARY SURVEY & SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOW A 25 FOOT
 CONSERVATION EASEMENT ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY. APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL BY
 THE PERTINENT ENTITIES (NPBCID AND THE POA) WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 (6) SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE RETAINING WALL.
 SINCE THE RETAINING WALL IS PROPOSED FOR THE HOUSE
 CONSTRUCTION AND THIS WALL IS CONTINGENT ON THE NPBCID
 AND THE POA APPROVAL, THEN THE RETAINING WALL PERMIT IS
 REQUIRED AT THIS TIME TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
 SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-02-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 10:46 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-04 14:14:55NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND AUDIT COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21090499
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- MISSING LOT DRAINAGE
 PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FOLLOWING: R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
  
 RESPONSE:
 PROPOSED DRAINAGE & SITE PLAN ON SHEET SP-1:
 BASED ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED
 DRAINAGE PLAN THIS LOT WILL HAVE FINISH GRADE
 ELEVATIONS A COUPLE OF FEET (3 FEET +/-) HIGHER THAN
 EXISTING GRADES. PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN IS INCOMPLETE.
 IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWING HOW THIS
 ELEVATED SOIL WILL BE SUPPORTED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. ALSO, THE HOUSE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
 SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN DON'T
 MATCH.
 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 RETAINING WALLS. ALSO, KEEP IN CONSIDERATION THAT THERE
 IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE NORTH WEST SIDE OF THIS
 LOT. COORDINATE WITH THE PERTINENT UTILITY TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 2- SHEET A-1:
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 A)WIND DESIGN DATA SPECIFIES EXPOSURE "B". ACCORDING TO
 SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL THIS BUILDING IS
 LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "C" NOT "B". REVISE EXPOSURE IN ALL
 PLANS.
 NOTE: REVISE DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES
 ACCORDINGLY. AND, VERIFY ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR
 COMPLIANCE BEFORE SUBMITTAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES SHOW THE REVISED DESIGN
 PRESSURES BUT THE DESIGN PRESSURES UNDER WIND DESIGN
 DATA ON SAME SHEET WAS NOT REVISED. ALSO, CODE
 INFORMATION ON SHEET A-2, A-3 AND S-2 STATE THAT THE
 MAXIMUM PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS DOES NOT EXCEED +/- 59
 PSF. THIS IS A CONFLICT WITH THE REVISED DESIGN
 PRESSURES SHOWN THE WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULES. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR DOOR #13 ARE
 -601.4?
 DESIGN PRESSURES ON THE WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULES STATES
 "P.S.I". CLARIFY IF THIS IS A MISTAKE OR IF CALCULATED
 PRESSURES ARE REALLY ON POUND PER SQUARE INCH.
 TYPICALLY, DESIGN PRESSURES ARE GIVEN IN POUNDS PER
 SQUARE FEET (P.S.F.).
  
 B)OK.
 C)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 D)CLARIFY THE PURPOSE COVERED PATIO DOOR #14 SHOWN
 ADJACENT TO THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS BY THE KITCHEN
 AREA. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION: DOOR TYPE, DESIGN
 PRESSURES, FRAMING, PRODUCT APPROVALS, ETC. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "THE PATIO DOOR IS
 BEING INSTALLED FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE SCREEN ENCLOSURE
 INSTALLATION".
 THERE ARE 2 CONCERNS ABOUT THIS PATIO DOOR. FIRST, IF
 THE PROPOSED USE IS A FUTURE SCREEN ENCLOSURE, THEN WHY
 THIS DOOR (#14) IS SPECIFIED AS A METAL/GLASS FRENCH
 DOOR?. AND SECOND, THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THIS DOOR
 NEED TO BE REVISED BASED ON THE PROPOSED LOCATION. NOW
 IS NOT A DOOR IN AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE. SEC. 107.2.1.2
 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 3- SHEET S-1:
 A)OK.
 B)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 C)FRAMED BEARING WALL BETWEEN OFFICE AND LIVING ROOM IS
 NOT CLEAR. FOUNDATION PLAN AND INTERIOR BEARING WALL
 DETAIL 4/S-3 SPECIFY 2X6 SPF @16"O.C. HOW CAN YOU HAVE
 2X6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. IF PLANS SHOW 11-1/2" COLUMNS
 SPACED AT 5'-0" AND 3'-0"? REVISE AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE
 CORRECT DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR BEARING WALL IN THIS
 AREA. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM CONNECTIONS ALSO. INTERIOR
 BEARING WALL DETAIL 4/S-3 ON SHEET S-3 SPECIFIES HUGHES
 TP6X TOP & BOTTOM CONNECTORS. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING
 HUGHES IS OUT OF BUSINESS AND THIS CONNECTORS ARE NO
 LONGER AVAILABLE. REVISE CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED OR
 PROVIDE COPY OF CURRENT HUGHES CATALOG.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THERE ARE NOT DETAILS OR SPECIFICATIONS FOR TOP AND
 BOTTOM CONNECTIONS FOR THE REVISED (3)2X6 SUPPORTING
 COLUMNS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 D)DESIGN DATA NOTE #4 SHOWN UNDER FOUNDATION NOTES IS
 MISSING INFORMATION. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO CLEARLY
 SPECIFY ROOF LIVE AND DEAD LOADS (TOP AND BOTTOM
 CHORDS), INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY
 TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES "B"
 AND "G". THIS HOUSE HAS TALL ATTICS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ONLY THE LIVE LOADS ARE SPECIFIED. ARCHITECT NEEDS TO
 SPECIFY THE DEAD LOADS ALSO. CLEARLY SPECIFY ROOF LIVE
 AND DEAD LOADS (TOP AND BOTTOM CHORDS)
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- SHEET S-2: THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR THE BEAMS AT
 THE COVERED PATIO AND ABOVE ALL OPENINGS. PROVIDE BEAM
 SCHEDULE AND COMPLETE DETAILS/ SPECIFICATIONS. SEC.
 R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NO BEAM SCHEDULE PROVIDED. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER
 STATES "THERE ARE TWO SETS OF BEAMS, ONE AT TRUSS
 BEARING HEIGHTS, AND THE OTHER AT THE TOP OF
 WINDOW/DOOR HEIGHT."
 THESE RESPONSE, DOESN'T CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE BEAMS
 ABOVE THE COVERED PATIO.
 SPECIFICATIONS ON THE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET
 S-4 AND S-5 SPECIFY "(2)COURSE BONDBEAM W/ (1)#5 DIA.
 EACH COURSE & POUR SOLID. ADD (2)30" LONG BENT BARS AT
 CORNERS. FILL BEAMS W/ 2,500 P.S.I. GROUT (8" TO 11
 SUMP)". THESE ARE TYPICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HOUSE
 BONDBEAM. THE BOND BEAM IS THE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURAL
 ELEMENT THAT IS PART OF A MASONRY WALL ASSEMBLY TO
 PROVIDE HORIZONTAL STRENGTH TO THAT MASONRY WALL.
 TYPICALLY, POURED CONCRETE BEAMS OR PRECAST LINTELS ARE
 SPECIFIED ON COVERED PORCHES.
 IT IS NOT CLEAR, BUT BASED ON THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE
 LETTER IT LOOKS LIKE THE ARCHITECT IS PROPOSING TO USE
 THIS BOND BEAM AS THE BEAM TO CARRY ALL THE LOADS ON
 THE COVERED PATIO AREA.
 IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN THERE IS A SAFETY STRUCTURAL
 CONCERN BASED ON THE BEAM SPANS AND DEAD LOADS ON THE
 COVERED PATIO. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE
 PROPOSED BOND BEAM IS ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT ALL THE LOADS
 ON THE COVERED PATIO. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 5-SHEET S-3:
 A)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)REVISE WINDOW/DOOR BUCK DETAIL. 1X4 BUCKS DON'T
 PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. DETAIL NO REVISED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 6- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. ROOF
 SHEATHING NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES O.C. IN THE
 FIELD AND EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 AND
 TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: REVISE SPECIFICATIONS ON ALL PLANS AND WALL
 SECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 SPECIFICATIONS ON THE BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET
 S-4 AND S-5 SPECIFY "PLYWD. SECURED TO TRUSS TOP CHORD
 W/ 8D RING SHANK NAILS (0.113" DIA.MIN.) @ 6"O.C.
 THROUGHOUT (ENTIRE ROOF IS AS ZONE 3) 4" O.C. @ ENDS".
 THESE SPECIFICATIONS DON'T SPECIFY 4" O.C. AS REQUIRED
 BY TABLE TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 NOTE: AFTER A SECOND REVIEW OF THE ROOF SHEATHING
 SPECIFICATIONS IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PLYWOOD THICKNESS
 WAS NOT SPECIFIED. PLEASE SPECIFY PLYWOOD THICKNESS
 ALSO.
  
 7-OK.
 8-OK.
 9-OK.
  
 10- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 A)GARAGE DOOR NOA 20-0922.36 IS FOR DOORS WITH A
 MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 9'-0". GARAGE DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
 ARE BIGGER. NEED ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIED
 LARGER SIZE. FAC 61G20-3.001.
  
 RESPONSE:
 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR NOA 20-0922.15 SUBMITTED. THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES OF THIS GARAGE DOOR DON'T MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD
 ON SHEET A-1 DOOR SCHEDULE. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 DOOR MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE CALCULATED DESIGN
 PRESSURES.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)MISSING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL TYPES OF WINDOWS
 SHOWN ON PLANS. FAC 61G20-3.001.
  
 RESPONSE:
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE
 SUBMITTED. THERE ARE NO WINDOWS PRODUCT APPROVALS
 UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX.
  
 C) OK.
 D) OK.
  
 11- OK.
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 10:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 08:58 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-30 10:55:44NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) AUDIT COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21090499
  
 1- MISSING LOT DRAINAGE
 PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FOLLOWING: R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
  
 2- SHEET A-1:
 A)WIND DESIGN DATA SPECIFIES EXPOSURE "B". ACCORDING TO
 SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL THIS BUILDING IS
 LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "C" NOT "B". REVISE EXPOSURE IN ALL
 PLANS.
 NOTE: REVISE DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES
 ACCORDINGLY. AND, VERIFY ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR
 COMPLIANCE BEFORE SUBMITTAL.
  
 B)FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A FIRE PIT INSIDE THE COVERED PATIO.
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS FIRE PIT. TYPICALLY
 FIRE PITS ARE BUILT OUTSIDE AND AWAY FROM THE BUILDING.
 THERE IS A CONCERN ABOUT FIRE GIVEN THE LOCATION AND
 TYPE OF FIRE PIT TO BE BUILT/INSTALLED. ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD NEEDS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING
 THAT PROPOSED INSTALLATION WILL NOT CREATE A FIRE
 HAZARD. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION, INCLUDING
 MANUFACTURER'S SPECS, FIRE PIT DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS,
 CLEARANCES, ETC. SEC. 101.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC.
 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 C)CLARIFY WHY ONLY THE WALLS ADJACENT TO BEDROOM #4 AND
 STORAGE ROOM ARE HATCHED TO BE INSULATED , WHILE THE
 WALL ADJACENT TO THE HALLWAY IS NOT? HALLWAY WALL IS
 ALSO SEPARATING A/C AREA FROM NON A/C AREA. SEC. R103.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D)CLARIFY THE PURPOSE COVERED PATIO DOOR #14 SHOWN
 ADJACENT TO THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS BY THE KITCHEN
 AREA. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION: DOOR TYPE, DESIGN
 PRESSURES, FRAMING, PRODUCT APPROVALS, ETC. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 3- SHEET S-1:
 A)THERE ARE NO DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR COVERED PATIO
 STRUCTURAL COLUMNS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 B)ENTRY PORCH CONSTRUCTION IS MISSING INFORMATION.
 THERE IS NO FOOTING FOR THE EXTERIOR WALL SHOWN AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE ENTRY PORCH. THERE ARE NO
 DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
 WALL EITHER. THERE ARE NO DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENTRY FACADE. DETAIL 1/S-5
 DOESN'T PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE
 EXTERIOR WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS.
 SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 C)FRAMED BEARING WALL BETWEEN OFFICE AND LIVING ROOM IS
 NOT CLEAR. FOUNDATION PLAN AND INTERIOR BEARING WALL
 DETAIL 4/S-3 SPECIFY 2X6 SPF @16"O.C. HOW CAN YOU HAVE
 2X6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. IF PLANS SHOW 11-1/2" COLUMNS
 SPACED AT 5'-0" AND 3'-0"? REVISE AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE
 CORRECT DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR BEARING WALL IN THIS
 AREA. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM CONNECTIONS ALSO. INTERIOR
 BEARING WALL DETAIL 4/S-3 ON SHEET S-3 SPECIFIES HUGHES
 TP6X TOP & BOTTOM CONNECTORS. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING
 HUGHES IS OUT OF BUSINESS AND THIS CONNECTORS ARE NO
 LONGER AVAILABLE. REVISE CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED OR
 PROVIDE COPY OF CURRENT HUGHES CATALOG.
  
 D)DESIGN DATA NOTE #4 SHOWN UNDER FOUNDATION NOTES IS
 MISSING INFORMATION. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO CLEARLY
 SPECIFY ROOF LIVE AND DEAD LOADS (TOP AND BOTTOM
 CHORDS), INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY
 TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES "B"
 AND "G". THIS HOUSE HAS TALL ATTICS.
  
 E)SOIL BEARING PRESSURE IS NOT CLEAR. DESIGN DATA NOTE
 #4 SHOWN UNDER FOUNDATION NOTES AND FOUNDATION NOTE #8
 SPECIFIES 3,000 PSF SOIL BEARING PRESSURE, WHILE
 FOUNDATION NOTE #1 ON SAME FOUNDATION NOTES SPECIFIES
 2,500 PSF. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 4- SHEET S-2: THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR THE BEAMS AT
 THE COVERED PATIO AND ABOVE ALL OPENINGS. PROVIDE BEAM
 SCHEDULE AND COMPLETE DETAILS/ SPECIFICATIONS. SEC.
 R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 5-SHEET S-3:
 A)GARAGE BUCK DETAIL IS MISSING INFORMATION. THERE IS
 NOT DETAIL 6/A-10. PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL BUCK
 DETAIL. SPECIFY ANCHOR TYPE, SIZE, SPACING AND
 EMBEDMENT. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 B)REVISE WINDOW/DOOR BUCK DETAIL. 1X4 BUCKS DON'T
 PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 6- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. ROOF
 SHEATHING NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES O.C. IN THE
 FIELD AND EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 AND
 TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: REVISE SPECIFICATIONS ON ALL PLANS AND WALL
 SECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT COVERED PORCH.
 SEC. R703.1.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2(B) ABOVE.
  
 8- HOUSE IS DESIGNED WITH UNVENTED ATTIC. ARCHITECT IS
 SPECIFYING R-20 SPRAY ISO. INSULATION. PROVIDE ICC
 EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE FOAM INSULATION TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
 WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 9- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED
 AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S LEGALLY
 DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION,
 PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.
  
 B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING THE BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-
 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C)NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IS INCORRECT. REVISE ITEM #4. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 D)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
 WHERE ARE THE TWO SW INSULATED 3X8 DOORS AND THE NW 3X8
 WOOD DOOR? SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS AND REVISE
 AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 E)WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
 ORIENTATION OF WINDOWS DON'T MATCH PLANS. SEE SURVEY
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 F) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL
 (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 10- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 A)GARAGE DOOR NOA 20-0922.36 IS FOR DOORS WITH A
 MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 9'-0". GARAGE DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
 ARE BIGGER. NEED ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIED
 LARGER SIZE. FAC 61G20-3.001.
  
 B)MISSING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL TYPES OF WINDOWS
 SHOWN ON PLANS. FAC 61G20-3.001
  
 C) WINDOW AND DOOR MULLIONS NOA 20-0814.10 NEED TO
 SPECIFY MULLION SIZES TO BE USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC. R301.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 D)ROOF TILE NOA 16-0711.05 DOESN'T SPECIFY TILE
 FASTENING METHOD. UNABLE TO VERIFY IF PROPOSED
 INSTALLATION WILL MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. SEC.
 R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: IF PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY
 SIZE AND NUMBER OF SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE
 ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL
 IS REQUIRED.
  
 11-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW/APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-03-08 Time 09:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-03-08 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-07 15:19:37ELECTRIC AUDIT FAILED
 1) ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM DETAILS GENERATOR TRANSFER
 SWITCHES ON LOAD SIDE OF BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELS WITHOUT
 DETAILING HOW SYSTEM WILL BE USED TO TRANSFER FROM
 NORMAL TO STANDBY POWER. PLEASE CORRECT WITH PROPER
 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM. NEC 215.5 IT APPEARS THE
 ORIGINAL DRAWING WAS CHANGED, UNNECESSARILY AS IT WAS
 CORRECT, EXCEPT FOR THE COMMENTS BELOW
 2) ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM DETAILS AN EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR BETWEEN THE METER AND THE FIRST
 MEANS OF DISCONNECT. PLEASE REMOVE THIS DETAIL TO
 COMPLY WITH NEC 250.30
 3) ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM DETAILS A #4 CU GROUNDING
 ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR FOR A 300-AMP SERVICE WITH 350 MCM
 SERVICE CONDUCTORS. PROPER GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 CONDUCTOR SIZED AS PER NEC 250.66 SHOULD BE A #2 CU
 CONDUCTOR. PLEASE CORRECT AS NOTED
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH ED.
 FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
 FS = FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 V/R,
  
 MICHAEL PETERSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6746
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2021-12-29 Time 15:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2021-12-29 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-29 15:13:50FAILED ELECTRICAL AUDIT FOR THE FOLLOWING
 1) INCORRECT SIZE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR NEC
 250.66
 2) INCORRECT SIZE MAIN BONDING JUMPER CONDUCTOR NEC
 250.102
 3) INCORRECT LOAD CALCULATION, MANY FASTENED IN PLACE
 APPLIANCES NOT LISTED NEC 220.82(B)(3)
 4) INCORRECT LOAD CALCULATION, HEAT IS LISTED AT 20KW
 FOR (3) 10KW HEAT STRIPS. COOLING SHOULD BE USED
 INSTEAD PER NEC 220.82? ?THE LARGEST OF THE SIX
 SELECTIONS. COOLING @ 100% LISTED AT 9.6KW EACH
  
 MICHAEL PETERSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6746
  
  
Review Stop E-LOWVOLT ELECTRICAL LOW VOLTAGE
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2023-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2023-01-13 Time 13:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2023-01-13 Time 13:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop G GAS REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2022-02-03 Time 06:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2022-02-03 Time 06:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-03 06:37:17GAS PLAN REVIEW, A GAS PLAN HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN
 THIS SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, AND A GAS PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT
 BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT AND
 PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM THE
 RELATED WORK. PROVIDE COMPLETE PLANS AND GAS RISER THAT
 REFLECTS THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF GAS WORK TO BE DONE PER
 THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.
  
 A SUB GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR
 FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK PER THE WPB AMENDMENT TO THE FBC
 SEC. 105.1.
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 10 Status N Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 14:35 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 9 Status N Date 2022-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-03-02 Time 07:20 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2022-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-01 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-02-28 Time 12:32 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2022-02-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-02-19 Time 09:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-02-16 Time 08:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2022-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-01-27 Time 16:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-01-25 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-01-26 Time 10:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-01-24 Time 09:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2021-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-07 Time 17:48 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2021-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2021-11-29 Time 16:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-11-17 Time 08:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2021-10-25 Time 16:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-10-15 Time 09:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-13 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-04-13 Time 11:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-13 09:01:59RECEIPT MU-2022-16113 - $12,372.98 PAID
2022-04-08 15:48:324/8/22 EMAILED IMPACT FOR REVIEW-AO
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2021-10-26 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 2021-10-26 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-26 16:12:58PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
 DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
 OFFICE. NOTIFICATION WILL OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
 FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
 OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
 IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
 THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
 CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
 TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-02-02 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-02-02 Time 16:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-02-02 Time 15:09 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-02 16:40:14MECHANICAL AUDIT ONLY. ME
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2021-12-29 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2021-12-29 Time 08:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-29 08:49:32MECHANICAL AUDIT:
  
 1) SHEET M.1: THE DRYER EXHAUST DETAIL CALLS FOR A BIRD
 SCREEN. THE SCREEN IS NOT PERMITTED ON A DRYER EXHAUST.
 FBC RES M1502.3
  
 MICHAEL EDWARDS
 MECHANICAL EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
 561-805-6728
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2022-02-03 Time 05:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2022-02-03 Time 05:32 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-03 05:50:51PLUMBING AUDIT ONLY ON E-1. LAC
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2021-12-29 Time 08:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2021-12-29 Time 08:37 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-29 08:37:26ADUIT APPROVED BY PLUMBING
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 9 Status P Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 14:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 14:34 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-29 10:53:11 
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2022-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-03-04 Time 16:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-03-04 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2022-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-01 Time 16:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-03-01 Time 11:07 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-01 16:42:14FS553.791 PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE
 AFFIDAVIT.
  
 1- PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT
 DATED 2/23/2022:
 A)NOA 18-0502.03 IS A ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT NOT AND ALUM
 WINDOW WALL SYSTEM AS SPECIFIED ON THE AFFIDAVIT.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 2- PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT
 DATED 2/21/2022:
 A)DRAWING M.1 UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX HAS A REVISION #2
 DATED 1/17/22. AFFIDAVIT STATES 9/27/2021. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH M.1 DRAWING.
  
 B)DRAWING M.2 UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX HAS A REVISION #1
 DATED 9/27/21. AFFIDAVIT STATES DATED 1/17/2022. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED TO MATCH M.2 DRAWING.
  
 C)HVAC LOAD CALCULATIONS DON'T HAVE THE PREPARATION
 DATE.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2022-02-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2022-02-19 Time 09:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2022-02-19 Time 09:55 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-19 09:56:29FS553.791 AFFIDAVIT DOES NOT REFLECT CORRECT DATE(S).
 FOR INSTANCE, SITE PLAN IS DATED 2/9/22. CHECK ALL.
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-02-01 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-02-01 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-02-01 Time 08:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-01 09:00:51COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. PP AFFIDAVIT AUDIT HAS
 BEEN APPROVED. ME
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-01-26 Time 15:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-01-26 Time 15:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-26 15:46:02PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT AUDIT
 ONLY
  
  
 3RD CYCLE AUDIT FBC-2020 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT-21090499
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
  
  
 PLAN REVIEW AUDIT RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT
 ARE NOT SIGNED BY THE PRIVATE PROVIDER.
  
 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT LISTED ON THE
 PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT.
  
 3) THE REVISED PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE
 AFFIDAVIT INDICATES THAT THE BOUNDARY SURVEY & SITE
 PLAN SHOULD HAVE A DATE 1/5/2022, THE DRAWING SUBMITTED
 HAS A DATE OF AUGUST 18, 2021. PLEASE SHOW THAT THE
 PRIVATE PROVIDER HAS REVIEWED THE LATEST VERSION.
  
 4) THE REVISED PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW COMPLIANCE
 AFFIDAVIT INDICATES THAT THE M-2 SHEET SHOULD HAVE A
 DATE OF 1/17/2022, THE SHEET SUBMITTED HAS A REVISED
 DATE OF 9/27/2021. PLEASE SHOW THAT THE PRIVATE
 PROVIDER HAS REVIEWED THE LATEST VERSION.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM.
  
 MICHAEL EDWARDS
 MECHANICAL EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
 561-805-6728
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rgathrig Date 2021-12-07 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rgathrig Date 2021-12-07 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-07 15:56:00PRIVATE PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT REVIEW APPROVED.
 THERE ARE NO PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS IN THE PLANS
 AND THE AFFIDAVIT FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER DOES NOT
 INCLUDE SUCH
 ADDITIONAL AFFIDAVIT WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS ARE SUBMITTED
  
 RICHARD GATHRIGHT
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By rgathrig Date 2021-11-29 Time 15:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rgathrig Date 2021-11-29 Time 15:26 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-29 15:40:09PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW NOT APPROVED
 THERE ARE ADDITIONAL A AND S PAGES UP LOADED. A
 DRAWINGS HAVE DIFFERENT DATE THAN WHAT IS ON THE
 AFFIDAVIT OF CODE COMPLIANCE. NO PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE
 INCLUDED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. WHEN WILL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS BE SUBMITTED. AN ADDITIONAL AFFIDAVIT
 WILL BE REQUIRED AT THAT TIME
 PLEASE COORDINATE THE UPLOADED PLANS WITH THE PRIVATE
 PROVIDER AND RESUBMIT
  
 RICHARD GATHROGHT
  
Review Stop PRIVATEPRV PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By rgathrig Date 2021-10-25 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rgathrig Date 2021-10-25 Time 16:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-25 16:08:52PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN AUDIT FAILED
 DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE ENTIRE SET OF PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED FOR THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 SHEETS SP-1, A-1, A-2, A-3, AND BOUNDRY SURVEY
 SUBMITTED.
 NO CERTIFICATE OF CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTED
  
 RICHARD GATHRIGHT
 ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-08 14:03:22ROOF TILE NOA 16-0711.05.
 TILE ADHESIVE FL6332-R9.
 UNDERLAYMENT NOA 18-0502.03.
 UNDERLAYMENT NOA 21-0602.14
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-02-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 15:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 15:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 11:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 10:53 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-30 11:06:541- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 A)ROOF TILE NOA 16-0711.05 DOESN'T SPECIFY TILE
 FASTENING METHOD. UNABLE TO VERIFY IF PROPOSED
 INSTALLATION WILL MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. SEC.
 R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: IF PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY
 SIZE AND NUMBER OF SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE
 ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL
 IS REQUIRED.
  
 B) MISSING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ROOF TILE HIP & RIDGE
 SUPPORT TO BE USED. FAC 61G20-3.001.
  
 2-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW/APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 18:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 18:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-04-08 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-08 16:59:2804/08/22 TALKED TO TIM DORNBLASER. HE WILL EMAIL ME THE
 REPORT WITH THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. JG.
  
  
  
 SIGNATURE REVIEW:
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- SOIL TEST REPORT NEEDS THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471
 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS/PLANS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
 SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH ENGINEER'S DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-03-08 Time 13:16 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-08 13:55:26THIRD SIGNATURE REVIEW:
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- SOIL TEST REPORT NEEDS THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471
 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS/PLANS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
 SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH ENGINEER'S DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-02-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 15:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-02-04 Time 15:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-04 15:15:00SECOND SIGNATURE REVIEW:
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- SOIL TEST REPORT NEEDS THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471
 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS/PLANS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
 SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH ENGINEER'S DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 10:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-30 Time 10:52 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-30 10:53:221- SOIL TEST REPORT NEEDS THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471
 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS/PLANS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
 SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH ENGINEER'S DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-04-05 Cont ID  
Sent By vbriglia Date 2022-04-05 Time 16:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vbroglia Date 2022-04-05 Time 16:54 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By vbroglia Date 2022-02-18 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vbroglia Date 2022-02-18 Time 13:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-01-25 Cont ID  
Sent By ajones Date 2022-01-25 Time 15:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ajones Date 2022-01-25 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-10-22 Cont ID  
Sent By rthermid Date 2021-10-22 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rthermid Date 2021-10-22 Time   Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved