| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21090438 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
06:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
06:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
Time |
06:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
Time |
06:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-03 07:23:28 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. ENGINEERING PREPARED BY TOM TWOMEY, PE REQUIRES THE | | | FOLLOWING MINIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES: | | | | | | WINDOWS, +71.7 / -71.7 | | | | | | SLIDING GLASS DOORS - +71.7 / -71.7 | | | | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE WINDOWS (FL 22250) | | | PROPOSES A WINDOW THAT HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION | | | OF +60 / -80. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT | | | SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | 2. I COULD NOT LOCATE A CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR, FBC B 1609. | | | | | | 3. COORDINATE WITH [email protected] TO HAVE ALL | | | UNNECESSARY DOCUMENTS DELETED. THERE ARE 19 FILES IN | | | THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOLDER. FOR PERMIT DOCUMENTS | | | THERE SHOULD BE: | | | | | | ONE LOCATION PLAN (FLOOR PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF | | | PROPOSED WINDOWS AND SGDS) | | | ENGINEERING (DESIGN PRESSURES PREPARED BY ENGINEER) | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WINDOWS | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS | | | | | | THEREFORE IN ADDITION TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THERE | | | SHOULD BE FOUR DOCUMENTS. THE DOCUMENTS SHOULD CLEARLY | | | INDICATE WHICH OPTION IS PROPOSED TO SHOW THAT THE | | | PROPOSED PRODUCT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED | | | BY THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-05 09:18:59 | WINDOWS AND DOORS | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | | AMENDMENT | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB 107 | | | | | | 1) PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA 12-0416.02) HAS EXPIRED. | | | | | | 2) PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA 12-0416.03) HAS EXPIRED. | | | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL (FL21434.2) | | | LISTED ON THE ENGINEERING FROM THOMAS J TWOMEY P.E. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
Time |
07:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
Time |
07:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-10-18 07:25:30 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR NOA IS MISSING THE DRAWING | | | PAGES, ONLY THE FIRST TWO PAGES WERE UPLOADED. FBC B | | | 1609, UPLOAD A COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL. ON THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL INDICATE THE INSTALLATION OPTION | | | PROPOSED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES | | | SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | 2. THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOW FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL IS MISSING THE EVALUATION REPORT AND | | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. THIS IS SOMETIMES ONE | | | DOCUMENT. ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL INDICATE THE | | | INSTALLATION OPTION PROPOSED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
06:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-09 |
Time |
07:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-03 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-10 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-10-27 |
Time |
06:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
Time |
07:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-29 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
09:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
Time |
07:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-18 |
Time |
07:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-10-18 07:23:46 | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED | | | PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN ORIGINAL. | | | | | | THE WINDLOAD CALCS PREPARED BY THOMAS TWOMEY, PE APPEAR | | | TO BE A SCAN AND IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | | WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE | | | UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE | | | ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER ORIGINAL WITH A WET | | | SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS | | | ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS AFTER | | | SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | |
|
|