Plan Review Details - Permit 21081109
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21081109
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 9 Status P Date 2022-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 14:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2022-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 13:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 13:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-08 14:47:28PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 7 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION
 THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF
 TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 1) NOT RESOLVED. [ SUBMIT NEW ENGINEERING FOR OPENING
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SEE COMMENT #2. ] PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER AFFIRMING THAT THE
 INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS WILL NOT
 HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST STRUCTURE WHEN IN
 USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC 1604.2 & 107.2.1
  
 2) NOT RESOLVED. [ THE DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE LATEST
 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND THE UPDATED DESIGN PRESSURES
 FROM STORM SMART DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE OPENING
 DESIGN PRESSURES FROM THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
 (ENGINEERING EXPRESS). BECAUSE THIS IS A HIGHRISE
 BUILDING SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING FROM A FLORIDA
 LICENSED P.E. FOR THE WINDLOAD DATA AND OPENING DESIGN
 PRESSURES IS REQUIRED. ] PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER
 EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS.
 ESPECIALLY OPENING #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE
 AND IS 134.5 SQFT COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 1604.2
  
 3) RESOLVED. A NEW INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED.
 NOTE: THE OPENING SIZES AND DESIGN PRESSURES WILL HAVE
 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ENGINEERING. FBC AMENDMENTS
 107.2.1
  
 4) RESOLVED. OPENIING SIZE WAS CORRECTED.
  
 5) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2022-04-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-04 Time 11:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-04 Time 11:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-04 11:27:02PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 6 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION
 THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF
 TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 1) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER
 AFFIRMING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM
 SHUTTERS WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST
 STRUCTURE WHEN IN USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC 1604.2 &
 107.2.1
  
 2) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL
 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. ESPECIALLY OPENING
 #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE AND IS 134.5 SQFT
 COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 1604.2
  
 3) SUBMIT A CORRECTED HURRICANE SHUTTER INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE. FBC 107.2.1
  
 4) ON SHEET 9 OF 29 OF THE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL
 (FL13068-R5), THE DESIGN PRESSURE OF 105 PSF IS CIRCLED
 FOR THE AVERAGE SPAN WIDTH OF UP TO 132" AND A MULLION
 LENGTH UP TO 144". I BELIEVE THAT THE OPENING IN
 QUESTION IS 197" WIDE AND 148" IN HEIGHT (BASED ON
 INFORMATION THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED). THE REQUIRED
 LENGTH FOR THE MULLION WOULD EXCEED THE 144" MULLION
 LENGTH ALLOWED BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. PLEASE CLARIFY.
 FBC 107.2.1 & 1604.2
  
 5) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2022-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-02-17 Time 14:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-02-14 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-14 10:48:52PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 5 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING - THE PROPOSED SCREEN FABRIC IMPACT
 PROTECTION DEVICE HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES OF +/-
 60 PSF WHICH IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED OPENING
 PRESSURES. WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE ROLL UP AND FABRIC
 SHUTTERS ARE NOT BEING INSTALLED TO PROVIDE IMPACT
 PROTECTION. OUR CONCERN IS THAT THE DEVICES REMAIN
 INTACT AND NOT BECOME DETACHED DURING A WIND EVENT. THE
 ROLL UP SHUTTERS ARE DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED ON AN
 ENCLOSED BUILDING AND THE FABRIC PANEL WILL ALLOW THE
 WIND INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE GAZEBO WHICH WILL
 INCREASE THE PRESSURE ON THE INTERNAL SIDE OF THE ROLL
 UP SHUTTERS. THE INTERNAL PRESSURE WILL BE GREATER THAN
 THE CONFIGURATION TESTED FOR THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. YOU
 MAY WISH TO LOOK AT OTHER OPTIONS, POSSIBLY ROLL UP
 GARAGE DOORS.
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW FOR REFERENCE
 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 4 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
 COMMENTS FROM THE 3RD REVIEW WERE NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION
 THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF
 TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 1) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER
 AFFIRMING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM
 SHUTTERS WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST
 STRUCTURE WHEN IN USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC
 107.2.1.2
  
 2) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL
 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. ESPECIALLY OPENING
 #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE AND IS 134.5 SQFT
 COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 107.2.1.2
  
 3) THE CUSTOM MOUNT DETAIL FOR OPENING #1 SHOWS ADDING
 AN ALUMINUM ANGLE TO THE END RETENTION TRACK. I BELIEVE
 THAT YOU INTEND THIS TO INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURE OF
 THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS. THE ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 A RATIONAL ANALYSIS THAT EXPLAINS HOW THIS WILL
 INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF THE PRODUCT. THE
 ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT
 FOR THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS THAT INDICATES THE MODE OF
 FAILURE. THE REPORT NEEDS TO SHOW WHICH COMPONENT OF
 THE ROLL-UP FAILED. IF IT IS THE SLATS THAT FAILED WHEN
 TESTED, REINFORCING THE RETENTION TRACK WILL NOT
 INCREASE THE PRODUCT'S DESIGN PRESSURE. FBC 107.2.1
  
 4) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2021-12-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-12-01 Time 13:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-12-01 Time 13:18 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-01 13:20:25PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 4TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
 COMMENTS FROM THE 3RD REVIEW WERE NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION
 THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF
 TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 1) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER
 AFFIRMING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM
 SHUTTERS WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST
 STRUCTURE WHEN IN USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC
 107.2.1.2
  
 2) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL
 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. ESPECIALLY OPENING
 #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE AND IS 134.5 SQFT
 COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 107.2.1.2
  
 3) THE CUSTOM MOUNT DETAIL FOR OPENING #1 SHOWS ADDING
 AN ALUMINUM ANGLE TO THE END RETENTION TRACK. I BELIEVE
 THAT YOU INTEND THIS TO INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURE OF
 THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS. THE ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 A RATIONAL ANALYSIS THAT EXPLAINS HOW THIS WILL
 INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF THE PRODUCT. THE
 ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT
 FOR THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS THAT INDICATES THE MODE OF
 FAILURE. THE REPORT NEEDS TO SHOW WHICH COMPONENT OF
 THE ROLL-UP FAILED. IF IT IS THE SLATS THAT FAILED WHEN
 TESTED, REINFORCING THE RETENTION TRACK WILL NOT
 INCREASE THE PRODUCT'S DESIGN PRESSURE. FBC 107.2.1
  
 4) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2021-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-11-10 Time 17:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-11-10 Time 17:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-10 15:05:09PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 3RD REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION
 THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF
 TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 1) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER
 AFFIRMING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM
 SHUTTERS WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST
 STRUCTURE WHEN IN USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC
 107.2.1.2
  
 2) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL
 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. ESPECIALLY OPENING
 #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE AND IS 134.5 SQFT
 COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 107.2.1.2
  
 3) THE CUSTOM MOUNT DETAIL FOR OPENING #1 SHOWS ADDING
 AN ALUMINUM ANGLE TO THE END RETENTION TRACK. I BELIEVE
 THAT YOU INTEND THIS TO INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURE OF
 THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS. THE ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE
 A RATIONAL ANALYSIS THAT EXPLAINS HOW THIS WILL
 INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF THE PRODUCT. THE
 ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT
 FOR THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS THAT INDICATES THE MODE OF
 FAILURE. THE REPORT NEEDS TO SHOW WHICH COMPONENT OF
 THE ROLL-UP FAILED. IF IT IS THE SLATS THAT FAILED WHEN
 TESTED, REINFORCING THE RETENTION TRACK WILL NOT
 INCREASE THE PRODUCT'S DESIGN PRESSURE. FBC 107.2.1
  
 4) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-10-12 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-10-12 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-10-12 Time 11:16 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-12 11:16:21PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 2ND REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) NOT RESOLVED. CIRCLE OR HI-LITE THE SPECIFIC ROOF
 TOP STRUCTURE THAT WILL RECEIVE THE SHUTTERS ON THE
 ELEVATION AND ROOF PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED. [THE
 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT IS TOO VAGUE. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION TO SPECIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF WHERE THE
 SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS OF THE
 BUILDING AND A BUILDING FLOOR PLAN FOR THE LEVEL WHERE
 THE UNIT IS LOCATED WITH THE SPECIFIC UNIT IDENTIFIED.
 FBC AMENDMENTS 107.2.1]
  
 2) NOT RESOLVED. THE ROOF TOP STRUCTURES HAVE MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHTS OF MORE THAN 280 FEET. SUBMIT SITE SPECIFIC
 ENGINEERING PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER FOR
 THE REQUIRED COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES FOR THE
 SHUTTERS ON THE ROOF TOP PAVILION AS PREVIOUSLY
 REQUESTED. [THIS IS A HIGH RISE BUILDING THAT IS MORE
 THAN 60 FEET IN HEIGHT. SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED DESIGN
 PRESSURES FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER. SUBMIT
 REQUIRED COMPONENT AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 THE OPENINGS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY A FLORIDA
 LICENSED ENGINEER. THE DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER IF SUBMITTED
 ELECTRONICALLY AND THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN
 SIGNATURE IF PAPER DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED. FS 471 &
 FAC 61G15 AND FBC AMEND. 107.1]
  
 3) A THOROUGH AND COMPLETE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE
 COMPLETED AT THIS TIME DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION ON
 THE SUBMITTED PLANS. ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
 MAY BE GENERATED WHEN MORE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-09-21 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-09-21 Time 16:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-21 16:39:29PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020)
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT IS TOO VAGUE. SUBMIT
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SPECIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF
 WHERE THE SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE
 ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND A BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
 FOR THE LEVEL WHERE THE UNIT IS LOCATED WITH THE
 SPECIFIC UNIT IDENTIFIED. FBC AMENDMENTS 107.2.1
  
 2) THIS IS A HIGH RISE BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN 60
 FEET IN HEIGHT. SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED DESIGN
 PRESSURES FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER. SUBMIT
 REQUIRED COMPONENT AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 THE OPENINGS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY A FLORIDA
 LICENSED ENGINEER. THE DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER IF SUBMITTED
 ELECTRONICALLY AND THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN
 SIGNATURE IF PAPER DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED. FS 471 &
 FAC 61G15 AND FBC AMEND. 107.1
  
 3) A THOROUGH AND COMPLETE PLAN REVIEW CANNOT BE
 COMPLETED AT THIS TIME DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION ON
 THE SUBMITTED PLANS. ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
 MAY BE GENERATED WHEN MORE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-08-31 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2021-08-31 Time 23:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2021-08-31 Time 22:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2022-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-04 Time 19:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-05 Time 07:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2022-04-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-04 Time 11:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-03-28 Time 07:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-02-17 Time 14:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-01-31 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2021-12-01 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-12-01 Time 13:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-11-15 Time 08:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2021-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-11-10 Time 17:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-11-04 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2021-10-12 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-10-12 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-09-28 Time 09:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2021-09-21 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2021-08-23 Time 10:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 13:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-05-09 Time 13:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-04-08 Time 15:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-02-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-02-14 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-02-14 Time 10:26 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved