Plan Review Details - Permit 21070135
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21070135
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2021-07-21 Time 10:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-07-21 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-21 10:22:35ADDRESS IS IN RANGE
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 13:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-12-29 Time 17:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-12-28 Time 17:04 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-29 17:35:59NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21070135.
  
 PROVISO: NOTE:
 BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO
 MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER
 THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY (EXCEPT FOR
 PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL).
  
 ***IMPORTANT****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION
 IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED
 INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
 ***IMPORTANT***
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE BOTTOM
 OF FORM BY THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT BEFORE ISSUING
 THE PERMIT.
  
  
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET
 S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED FINISH ELEVATION OF THE
 MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE. SAME COMMENT APPLIES FOR
 FOUNDATION PLAN.
 NOTE: REVISED DRAWING A2.0 WAS NO UPLOADED TO
 PROJECTDOX.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR
 PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC.
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED DRAWING A2.0 WAS NO UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT
 IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF
 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E).
  
 RESPONSE:
 EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE GARAGE IS NOT DESCRIBED. ALSO,
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR A/C PROPOSED ELEVATION
 (INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNIT).
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 2- LOT DRAINAGE.
 D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE
 PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 COMPLIED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH FENCE PERMIT
 22120482.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE
 BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 PARTIALLY DONE. REVISED DRAWING E1 DOESN'T SHOW A
 CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MASTER
 BEDROOM.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED DRAWING E-1 WAS NOT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX.
  
 11-SHEET A5.0:
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)REVISED EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL DOESN'T SHOW FULL
 SUPPORT OF THE DOOR FRAME. SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK IS
 NOT SPECIFIED. THERE ARE ONLY SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 BLOCKING PIECE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH DOOR PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR TYPE OF DOOR FRAME TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 DOOR BUCK DETAIL WAS REVISED BUT TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL
 WAS REVISED AS WELL. NOW WINDOW DETAIL SHOWS A BEVELED
 BUCK. BEVELED BUCKS ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. R609.7.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL
  
  
 15- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT REVISED AND
 RESUBMITTED. SAME COMMENTS APPLY. SEE BELOW:
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 RESPONSE:
 A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED
 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S
 ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY
 THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND
 JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS,
 DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS
 FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY
 THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE
 TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 16- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):
  
 A)ROOFING COVER MATERIAL (NOTE: COORDINATE WITH PLANS.
 ELEVATIONS CALL FOR CONCRETE TILE, SECTIONS ON SHEET
 A4.0 CALL METAL ROOFING PANELS, WALL SECTIONS CALL FOR
 SHINGLES UNDER A ROOF TILE NOTE???. REVISE/CLARIFY ALL
 PLANS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
 C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.
 D)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR (SEE SIZE ON PLANS)
 E)SLIDING GLASS DOORS.
 F)ENTRY DOOR.
 G)FLOOD VENTS (COORDINATE WITH ITEM #18 BELOW)
  
 RESPONSE:
 TO AVOID MORE CONFUSION/DEALS PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AFTER THE
 PERMIT ISSUED AS MENTIONED ON ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE
 LETTER. COORDINATE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH DESIGNER
 OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 17- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ARCHITECT'S LETTER STATING THAT HE APPROVES ALL THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS AND NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
 SUBMITTED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING
 WHICH PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED/APPROVED.
 WHEN PROVIDING A LETTER FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW,
 THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH SPECIFIC
 PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND MODEL.
 A PREFER ALTERNATIVE IS FOR ARCHITECT TO STAMP A REVIEW
 STAMP OR TO WRITE ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE
 REVIEWED/APPROVED. THIS WAY IT WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW
 PROCESS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED:
  
 18- FOUNDATION PLAN:
 A) FOUNDATION PLAN IS MISSING THE 6" DROP ON THE SLAB
 AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0.
  
 B)FOUNDATION FINISH FLOOR IS BELOW THE 2 FEET FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCE (SEC. 18-284
 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY FLOOD
 VENTS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R322.2.2
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 19- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF
 THE OUTSIDE A/C UNIT. SEC. R322.1.6 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 20- FINISH ROOFING IS NOT CLEAR. ELEVATIONS CALL FOR
 CONCRETE TILE, SECTIONS ON SHEET A4.0 CALL METAL
 ROOFING PANELS, WALL SECTIONS CALL FOR SHINGLES UNDER A
 ROOF TILE NOTE???. REVISE/CLARIFY ALL PLANS AS REQUIRED
 TO MATCH. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #16 ABOVE. SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 21- REVISE BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS SIZE. SINGLE HUNG
 WINDOWS DON'T SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CLEAR
 OPENING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 TYPICALLY, 60" HEIGHT WINDOW DOESN???T PROVIDE THE 24"
 CLEARLY HEIGHT OPENING. REVISE WINDOW SIZE AS REQUIRED
 OR PROVIDE MANUFACTURER???S SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 22- SIZE OF GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR IS NOT PROVIDED NOW.
 PROVIDE INFORMATION: SIZE AND DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC.
 R301.2.1 FBC=RESIDENTIAL.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 09:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-11 15:27:59NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21070135
  
  
  
 IMPORTANT: REPEAT COMMENT, NOT ADDRESSED:
 PLEASE UPLOAD A SMALLER FILE FOR SHEETS A1.0, A2.0.
 THESE DRAWINGS ARE TOO LARGE AND WE CANNOT PROPERLY
 OPEN AND MARK THEM WHEN PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE.
 NOTE: THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND LAYERS
 AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING
 PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY INFORMATION. THESE
 APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
  
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET
 S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED
 FINISHED ELEVATION OF THE MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT
 SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE.
 ALSO, FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE
 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION AT THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE
 GARAGE. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR
 PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC.
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. STILL UNABLE TO OPEN
 DRAWINGS. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND
 LAYERS AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR
 PERMITTING PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY
 INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 (1) OK.
 (2)OK.
 (3)OK.
  
 (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 RESPONSE:
 PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT
 IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF
 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E).
  
 NEW COMMENT:
 THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DATES WHEN THE SURVEYOR SIGNED
 AND SEALED THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. SIGNATURE DATE
 SHOULD BE THE DATE IT WAS SIGNED BY THE SURVEYOR. THESE
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS REVISED. ONLY THE DATE OF THE
 DIGITAL SIGNATURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- LOT DRAINAGE.
 A)OK.
 B)OK.
 C)OK.
  
 D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE
 PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 3- OK.
 4- OK.
 5- OK.
 6- OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE
 BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 PARTIALLY DONE. REVISED DRAWING E1 DOESN'T SHOW A
 CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MASTER
 BEDROOM.
  
 8- OK.
 9- OK.
  
 10- STRUCTURAL PLANS:
 A)OK
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND
 LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS.
 INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE
 R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G".
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP
 CHORD LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE AND
 DEAD LOADS. NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE
 R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 C)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW A VENTED ATTIC. COORDINATE WITH
 REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTIC
 IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEE COMMENT BELOW.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ARCHITECT NEEDS TO SPECIFY LOCATION OF THE VENTS
 SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1/A5.0. SHOW VENT
 LOCATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN.
  
 11-SHEET A5.0:
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 A)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH A VENTED
 OR UNVENTED ATTIC. TYPICAL WALL SECTION SHOWS AN
 UNVENTED ATTIC, WHILE THE SECTION AT BOND BEAM DETAIL
 ABOVE THE WALL SECTION SHOWS A VENTED ATTIC.
 REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: IF VENTED, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND SPACING.
 IF UNVENTED, THEN PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE
 FOAM R-30 INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT TO
 VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
 WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ARCHITECT NEEDS TO SPECIFY LOCATION OF THE VENTS
 SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1/A5.0. SHOW VENT
 LOCATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL SPECIFIES 1X4 OR 2X4 P.T.
 BUCK. THIS SIZE OF BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
 THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED. BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED DETAIL DOESN'T SHOW FULL SUPPORT OF THE DOOR
 FRAME. SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK IS NOT SPECIFIED. THERE
 ARE ONLY SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BLOCKING PIECE. ALSO,
 COORDINATE WITH DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TYPE OF DOOR
 FRAME TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 12- OK.
 13- OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 14- REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE PROVISION SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET A0.0. THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS R3 NOT R2.
 SEC. 310.5 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 15- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 RESPONSE:
 A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED
 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S
 ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY
 THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND
 JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 C)OK.
 D)OK.
 E) OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS,
 DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS
 FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY
 THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE
 TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 16- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):
  
 A)ROOF SHINGLES.
 B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
 C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD.
 NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR HORIZONTAL
 SLIDING WINDOWS NOT FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 17- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES ALSO TO PRODUCT APPROVALS ALREADY
 SUBMITTED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 18- OK.
  
 19- INFORMATIONAL:
 SIDEWALK NOTES ON SHEET A1.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SIDEWALK IS NOT
 INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
 COORDINATE NOTES WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
 SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-20 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-21 09:49:16NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21070135
  
 IMPORTANT: REPEAT COMMENT, NOT ADDRESSED:
 PLEASE UPLOAD A SMALLER FILE FOR SHEETS A1.0, A2.0.
 THESE DRAWINGS ARE TOO LARGE AND WE CAN NOT PROPERLY
 OPEN AND MARK THEM WHEN PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE.
 THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. MAYBE BY DELETING THE
 BACKGROUND LAYERS WILL HELP. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD
 ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 12.2 FEET BASED ON NAVD
 1988.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2)
 FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC.
 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS.
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THREE DIFFERENT
 FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED (SEC.
 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
 B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
 C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION.
 NOTE:
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW.
  
 RESPONSE:
 A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET
 S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR
 PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC.
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO DRAWING A1.0 ALSO. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 (1) GARAGE INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. THIS BUILDING HAS
 AN ATTACHED GARAGE.
 (2)THE VERTICAL DATUM SPECIFIED ON ITEM C2 DOESN'T
 MATCH VERTICAL DATUM USED FOR THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION
 (BFE),
 (3)SPECIFY GARAGE SLAB PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
  
 D)REVISE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE THE
 TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A5.0.
 COORDINATE WITH PLANS AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE TO
 AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- LOT DRAINAGE.
 PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FOLLOWING:
 R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION REQUIRED BY COMMENT #1 ABOVE, WHEN PREPARING
 THE DRAINAGE PLAN. PROVIDE PLAN SHOWING THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED GRADES. SHOW GRADES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES
 TO VERIFY THEY DON'T GET AFFECTED BY-THE NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISE RETAINING WALL DETAIL ON SHEET A1.2:
 A)CLARIFY FOOTING DEPTH (5'-01/64" MIN?) AND FOOTING
 DEPTH BELOW GRADE (3'-4" MIN?). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL
 PROPOSED SWALES. SPECIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 C)IT LOOKS LIKE THE DRAIN WEEP HOLE IS DIRECTED TO THE
 NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED. SEC. 107.2.5
 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE
 PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE: A DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR FOR FINAL INSPECTION
 APPROVAL.
  
 3- OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MIN. CLEAR WIDTH
 OF 32" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS W1 AND W3 DON'T COMPLY WITH
 SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 WINDOW SCHEDULE SPECIFY 5'-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.
 TYPICALLY, 5-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS DON'T PROVIDE
 THE 24" CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR
 PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT
 SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE PROVIDES 24" CLEAR OPENING AND
 MIN. REQUIRED TOTAL CLEAR OPENING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 6- NEED BATHROOM WITH MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRIVACY AND A
 DOOR THAT PROVIDES 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R320 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE
 BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 8- OK.
 9- OK.
  
 10- STRUCTURAL PLANS:
 A)OK
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND
 LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS.
 INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE
 R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G".
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 C)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW A VENTED ATTIC. COORDINATE WITH
 REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTIC
 IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEE COMMENT BELOW.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 STILL NOT CLEAR IF THE ATTIC IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR
 UNVENTED. ENGINEER'S PLANS SHOW VENTED ATTIC WHILE
 ARCHITECT'S PLANS SHOW UNVENTED ATTIC. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
 COORDINATE WITH ITEM #10(A)BELOW REGARDING ATTIC
 VENTILATION.
 (NOTE: THERE WAS A TYPO ON MY PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. I
 REPEATED NUMBER 10 TWICE BY MISTAKE. I APOLOGIZE).
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 10-SHEET A5.0:
 A)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH A VENTED
 OR UNVENTED ATTIC. TYPICAL WALL SECTION SHOWS AN
 UNVENTED ATTIC, WHILE THE SECTION AT BOND BEAM DETAIL
 ABOVE THE WALL SECTION SHOWS A VENTED ATTIC.
 REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: IF VENTED, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND SPACING.
 IF UNVENTED, THEN PROVIDE PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT
 FOR THE FOAM R-30 INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT
 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
 WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 RESPONSE:
 SEE ITEM #10(C) ABOVE.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 B)EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL SPECIFIES 1X4 OR 2X4 P.T.
 BUCK. THIS SIZE OF BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
 THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED. BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 C)TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHOWS BEVELED BUCK. BEVELED
 BUCKS ARE NOT ALLOWED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 11- OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 12- PARTITIONS ON FLOOR PLAN AND WALL LEGEND SHOWN ON
 SHEET A2.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE SHEAR WALLS
 SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ON SHEET S1. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 SHEARWALL CONSTRUCTION STILL NOT CLEAR. ENGINEER SHOWS
 WOOD STUDS, WHILE ARCHITECT SHOWS METAL STUDS.
 COORDINATE AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COMPLETE SHEARWALL
 DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS.SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 13- REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE PROVISION SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET A0.0. THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS R3 NOT R2.
 SEC. 310.5 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMMENTS
 WERE NOT ADDRESSED:
  
 A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED
 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S
 ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY
 THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND
 JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C)A/C AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T MATCH A/C AREA
 SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D)ITEM #11 WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH REVISED
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE ITEM #10(A) ABOVE. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 E)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4.
 TYPICALLY, THE RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY
 THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. R806.2. NOTE: ARCHITECT OF RECORD
 NEEDS TO REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS,
 DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS
 FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY
 THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE
 TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 H) BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE
 LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMMENTS
 WERE NOT ADDRESSED:
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 15- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 A)ROOF SHINGLES.
 B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 16- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL L PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES ALSO TO PRODUCT APPROVALS ALREADY
 SUBMITTED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 17- OK.
  
 18- SIDEWALK NOTES ON SHEET A1.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SIDEWALK IS NOT
 INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
 COORDINATE NOTES WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
 SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
 FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
 ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
 PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
 NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
 DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
 TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
 SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
 INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
 STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
 VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
 SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
 TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
 FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
 OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
 REVIEW
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-14 10:28:55NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21070135
  
 IMPORTANT:
 PLEASE UPLOAD A SMALLER FILE FOR SHEETS A1.0, A2.0.
 THESE DRAWINGS ARE TOO LARGE AND WE CAN NOT PROPERLY
 OPEN AND MARK THEM WHEN PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE.
 THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. MAYBE BY DELETING THE
 BACKGROUND LAYERS WILL HELP. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
  
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD
 ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 12.2 FEET BASED ON NAVD
 1988.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2)
 FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC.
 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS.
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THREE DIFFERENT
 FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED (SEC.
 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
 B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
 C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION.
 NOTE:
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW.
  
 2- LOT DRAINAGE.
 PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FOLLOWING:
 R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION REQUIRED BY COMMENT #1 ABOVE, WHEN PREPARING
 THE DRAINAGE PLAN. PROVIDE PLAN SHOWING THE EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED GRADES. SHOW GRADES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES
 TO VERIFY THEY DON'T GET AFFECTED BY-THE NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 4- ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MIN. CLEAR WIDTH
 OF 32" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 5- BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS W1 AND W3 DON'T COMPLY WITH
 SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 WINDOW SCHEDULE SPECIFY 5'-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.
 TYPICALLY, 5-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS DON'T PROVIDE
 THE 24" CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR
 PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT
 SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE PROVIDES 24" CLEAR OPENING AND
 MIN. REQUIRED TOTAL CLEAR OPENING.
  
 6- NEED BATHROOM WITH MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRIVACY AND A
 DOOR THAT PROVIDES 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R320 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE
 BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 8- IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT ROOF MATERIAL IS GOING TO BE
 INSTALLED IN THIS HOUSE. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW ROOF
 TILE, SHINGLES AND METAL ROOF. COORDINATE
 SPECIFICATIONS ON ALL PLANS TO MATCH ( BUILDING
 SECTIONS AND DETAILS). REVISE AS REQUIRED. IF
 INSTALLING ROOF TILE , THEN SPECIFY FASTENING METHOD,
 FOAM OR MECHANICALLY FASTENED. IF SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY
 SIZE AND NUMBER. SEC. 107.2.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 9- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW
 COMPLYING WITH THE NEW 2020 CODE REQUIREMENT FOR
 ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. SEC. R905.1.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH METHOD OF SEC. R905.1.1.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL IS GOING TO BE USED. AND PROVIDE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY F.A.C. 61G20-3.001
  
 10- STRUCTURAL PLANS:
 A)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW SHINGLES AS THE ROOF FINISH
 MATERIAL. STRUCTURAL LOADS ARE BASED ON THIS MATERIAL.
 STRUCTURAL PLANS TO BE COORDINATED WITH REVISED
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE COMMENTS ON ITEM #8 ABOVE AND
 REVISE STRUCTURAL LOADS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. IF ACTUAL
 ROOF MATERIAL IS SHINGLES, THEN REVISION NO REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B)STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND
 LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS.
 INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE
 R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G".
  
 C)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW A VENTED ATTIC. COORDINATE WITH
 REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTIC
 IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEE COMMENT BELOW.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 10-SHEET A5.0:
 A)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH A VENTED
 OR UNVENTED ATTIC. TYPICAL WALL SECTION SHOWS AN
 UNVENTED ATTIC, WHILE THE SECTION AT BOND BEAM DETAIL
 ABOVE THE WALL SECTION SHOWS A VENTED ATTIC.
 REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: IF VENTED, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND SPACING.
 IF UNVENTED, THEN PROVIDE PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT
 FOR THE FOAM R-30 INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT
 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN
 WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 B)EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL SPECIFIES 1X4 OR 2X4 P.T.
 BUCK. THIS SIZE OF BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
 THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED. BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C)TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHOWS BEVELED BUCK. BEVELED
 BUCKS ARE NOT ALLOWED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 11- PROVIDE FIRE RATING SPECIFICATIONS FOR GARAGE DOOR
 LEADING TO THE INTERIOR OF THE HOUSE SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. R302.5.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 12- PARTITIONS ON FLOOR PLAN AND WALL LEGEND SHOWN ON
 SHEET A2.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE SHEAR WALLS
 SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ON SHEET S1. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 13- REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE PROVISION SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET A0.0. THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS R3 NOT R2.
 SEC. 310.5 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED
 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S
 ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY
 THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND
 JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C)A/C AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T MATCH A/C AREA
 SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D)ITEM #11 WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH REVISED
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE ITEM #10(A) ABOVE. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 E)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4.
 TYPICALLY, THE RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS
 SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY
 THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. R806.2. NOTE: ARCHITECT OF RECORD
 NEEDS TO REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS,
 DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS
 FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY
 THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE
 TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 H) BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE
 LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 15- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 A)ROOF FINISH MATERIAL.
 -ROOF TILE AND CLEARLY MARK ROOF TILE FASTENING METHOD:
 SCREWS, PADDY SIZE, ETC.
 -SHINGLES.
 -METAL ROOF AND CLEARLY MARK FASTENING METHOD.
  
 B)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEE ONE
 LISTED ON TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 C)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 16- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES ALSO TO PRODUCT APPROVALS ALREADY
 SUBMITTED.
  
 17-VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS,
 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $250.738. THE
 PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $2920.18.
  
 18- SIDEWALK NOTES ON SHEET A1.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SIDEWALK IS NOT
 INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
 COORDINATE NOTES WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
 SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-01 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2023-02-01 Time 21:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2023-02-01 Time 19:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2023-01-03 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2023-01-03 Time 20:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2023-01-03 Time 18:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-06-06 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-06-06 Time 23:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-06-06 Time 22:13 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-01-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-01-03 Time 10:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-01-03 Time 10:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-03 10:55:472ND ELECTRICAL REVIEW FAILED
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS STILL NOT ADDRESSED
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 MICHAEL PETERSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6746
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-08-23 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2021-08-23 Time 21:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2021-08-23 Time 20:54 Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-23 21:42:53ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 1. RECEPTACLE SPACING IN BEDROOMS IS NOT CODE
 COMPLIANT. MUST HAVE RECEPTACLE WITHIN 6' OF ENTRY
 DOORS AND ON WALLS GREATER THAN 2'. NEC 210.52
  
 2. ELECTRICAL PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED BY PERSON
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. PROVIDE CORRECTION. FS
 481.229; WPB FBC 107.2.1, 107.3.5.1.2
  
 3. SMOKE ALARMS OUTSIDE BEDROOMS MUST BE SMOKE/CARBON
 COMBOS AND BE WITHIN 10' OF BEDROOM DOORS. FBC-R 314
 AND 315, NFPA 72
  
 END OF COMMENTS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES
 INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
 CODES IN EFFECT:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/FORMS/B
 UILDING-PERMIT-FORMS
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH ED.
 FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
 FS = FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 V/R,
  
 FRANK GIAQUINTO III
 ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 CELL: 561-805-6744
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-12-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 2022-12-14 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 2022-12-14 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2023-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-02-21 Time 21:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2023-01-24 Time 15:25 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2023-01-03 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2023-01-03 Time 20:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-12-08 Time 15:49 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-05-21 Time 09:43 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By vbroglia Date 2022-02-08 Time 12:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vbroglia Date 2021-11-17 Time 06:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-08-05 Time 10:50 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2023-02-24 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-02-24 Time 13:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2023-02-21 Time 15:54 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-24 11:30:32RECEIPT MU-2023-007736-0000 $11,913.65 PAID
2023-02-21 15:54:45EMAILED IMPACT FOR REVIEW-AO
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-12-30 Time 08:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-12-30 Time 08:52 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 08:53:09 
 IMPACT FEES
 PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
 PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
 DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
 OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
 FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
 OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
 IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
 THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
 CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
 TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
 APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
 YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-10-26 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-10-26 Time 12:58 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-26 12:59:11 
 IMPACT FEES
 PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
 PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
 DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
 OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
 FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
 OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
 IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
 THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
 CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
 TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
 APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
 YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:02 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-14 11:03:06 
 IMPACT FEES
 PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
 PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
 DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
 OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
 FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
 OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
 IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
 THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
 CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
 TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
 APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
 YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-12-30 Time 07:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-12-30 Time 07:30 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-05-25 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-05-25 Time 16:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-11-22 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2021-11-22 Time 09:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2021-11-22 Time 09:26 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-22 09:26:51PLEASE ADDRESS 1AT CYCLE MECHANICAL COMMENTS BELOW:
  
 1ST REVIEW FBC-2020 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT-21070135
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
  
 FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE
 FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION
 FBC FG- FLORIDA FUEL GAS
 FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE
 FBC RES- FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
 FS- FLORIDA STATUTES
 FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) PLEASE SHOW THE BATH EXHAUST TERMINATION LOCATIONS.
 FBC RES M303.5
  
 2) PLEAS SHOW THE DRYER EXHAUST TERMINATION LOCATION.
 FBC RES M1502.3
  
 3) PLEASE SHOW THE KITCHEN HOOD AND DUCT TERMINATION IF
 VENTED TO OUTDOORS. FBC RES M1503.1
  
 4) PLEASE PROVIDE THE CFM?S OF THE KITCHEN EXHAUST
 HOOD. FBC RES M1503.4
  
 5) PLEASE SHOW THE ANCHORAGE OF THE OUTDOOR APPLIANCE.
 FBC RES M1307.2
  
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM.
  
 MICHAEL EDWARDS
 MECHANICAL EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
 561-805-6728
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-08-20 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2021-08-20 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2021-08-20 Time 13:01 Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-20 13:02:191ST REVIEW FBC-2020 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT-21070135
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
  
 FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE
 FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION
 FBC FG- FLORIDA FUEL GAS
 FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE
 FBC RES- FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
 FS- FLORIDA STATUTES
 FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) PLEASE SHOW THE BATH EXHAUST TERMINATION LOCATIONS.
 FBC RES M303.5
  
 2) PLEAS SHOW THE DRYER EXHAUST TERMINATION LOCATION.
 FBC RES M1502.3
  
 3) PLEASE SHOW THE KITCHEN HOOD AND DUCT TERMINATION IF
 VENTED TO OUTDOORS. FBC RES M1503.1
  
 4) PLEASE PROVIDE THE CFM?S OF THE KITCHEN EXHAUST
 HOOD. FBC RES M1503.4
  
 5) PLEASE SHOW THE ANCHORAGE OF THE OUTDOOR APPLIANCE.
 FBC RES M1307.2
  
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM.
  
 MICHAEL EDWARDS
 MECHANICAL EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
 561-805-6728
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 13:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-12-29 Time 17:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-12-29 Time 17:39 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-29 17:40:00CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REVIEW:
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 1- REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT
 IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF
 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E).
  
 RESPONSE:
 EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE GARAGE IS NOT DESCRIBED. ALSO,
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR A/C PROPOSED ELEVATION
 (INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNIT). THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ON THE NOTES SECTION OF SECTION D. SEE FEMA
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
  
 2- REVISE ITEM A7. BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED THE
 BUILDING DIAGRAM NUMBER IS 1A NOT 1B. SEE FEMA
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 13:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 13:09 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-12 13:35:44NFIP PEER REVIEW
  
 CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O., CFM
 PLANS EXAMINER II PX3169/SFP306
 INSPECTOR BN4338
 BUILDING OFFICIAL BU1635
 ASFPM CERTIFIED FLOODPLAIN MANAGER US-21-11935
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 (561) 805-6726
 [email protected]
  
 CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. LINE A1 OWNERS NAME APPEARS TO BE RICARDO RODRIGUEZ.
 PER WARRANTY DEED SUBMITTE4D FOR REVIEW, THE OWNER'S
 NAME SHOULD BE "HG 1041 LAKEWOOD LLC"
 (SEE ALSO-PERMIT APPLICATION)
 PROVIDE CLARIFICATION (CONTRACT FOR SALE/WARRANTY
 DEED/OTHER), THAT RICARDO RODRIGUEZ IS THE OWNER?
  
 2. LINE C2(F) IS MISSING DATA.
  
 3. LINE C2(G) IS MISSING DATA
  
  
  
  
  
2022-07-11 13:10:06NFIP REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET
 S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED
 FINISHEDD ELEVATION OF THE MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT
 SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE.
 ALSO, FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE
 FINISHE FLOOR ELEVATION AT THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE
 GARAGE. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR
 PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC.
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. STILL UNABLE TO OPEN
 DRAWINGS. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND
 LAYERS AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR
 PERMITTING PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY
 INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:
 C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 (1) OK.
 (2)OK.
 (3)OK.
  
 (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 RESPONSE:
 PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT
 IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF
 EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E).
  
 NEW COMMENT:
 THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DATES WHEN THE SURVEYOR SIGNED
 AND SEALED THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. SIGNATURE DATE
 SHOULD BE THE DATE IT WAS SIGNED BY THE SURVEYOR. THESE
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS REVISED. ONLY THE DATE OF THE
 DIGITAL SIGNATURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-21 10:02:10NFIP REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD
 ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 12.2 FEET BASED ON NAVD
 1988.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2)
 FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC.
 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS.
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THREE DIFFERENT
 FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED (SEC.
 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
 B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
 C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION.
 NOTE:
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW.
  
 RESPONSE:
 A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET
 S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
 PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS
 LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR
 PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC.
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO DRAWING A1.0 ALSO. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 (1) GARAGE INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. THIS BUILDING HAS
 AN ATTACHED GARAGE.
 (2)THE VERTICAL DATUM SPECIFIED ON ITEM C2 DOESN'T
 MATCH VERTICAL DATUM USED FOR THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION
 (BFE),
 (3)SPECIFY GARAGE SLAB PROPOSED ELEVATION.
 (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION.
  
 D)REVISE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE THE
 TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A5.0.
 COORDINATE WITH PLANS AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE TO
 AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:03 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-14 11:05:15NFIP REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD
 ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 12.2 FEET BASED ON NAVD
 1988.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2)
 FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC.
 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS.
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THREE DIFFERENT
 FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED (SEC.
 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
 B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
 C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION.
 NOTE:
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rwbrown Date 2022-12-30 Time 06:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rwbrown Date 2022-12-30 Time 06:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By rwbrown Date 2022-05-24 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rwbrown Date 2022-05-24 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By abelisle Date 2021-11-29 Time 17:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By abelisle Date 2021-11-29 Time 13:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-08-30 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2021-08-30 Time 06:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2021-08-23 Time 14:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-30 06:33:431) SHT. A2.0 - FLOOR PLAN NOTE #2 REFERS TO A WHOLE
 HOUSE TANKLESS WATER HEATER BUT THE FLOOR PLAN AND
 WATER RISER SHOWS A TANK TYPE WATER HEATER. CLARIFY.
 2) SHT. A5.0 - DETAIL #1 REFERS TO RAINWATER
 CALCULATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN. THERE ARE NO RAINWATER
 CALCULATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN. CLARIFY.
 3) RAINWATER SHALL DISCHARGE A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT FROM
 THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL. FBC-RES. SEC. 318.5.
 4) SHT. P-1 AND P-2 DO NOT BEAR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 AND SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PER FL. ADMIN. CODE
 RULE 61G15-23.004, 61G15-23.005.
 5) SHT. IR-1 - THE IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE LOCATED A
 MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL PER
 FBC-RES.SEC. 318.5.
 6) THE RELIEF VALVE DISCHARGE FOR THE WATER HEATER
 SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC-RES. SEC. P2804.6.1 AND BE
 LOCATED IN THE SAMEE ROOM AS THE WATER HEATER.
 7) AN AIR ARRETOR IS REQUIRED FOR THE DISHWASHER PER
 FBC-RES. SEC.P2903.5.
  
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop P-IRRIGATE IRRIGATION REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-08-30 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2021-08-30 Time 07:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2021-08-30 Time 07:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-12-30 Time 09:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-12-30 Time 08:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 09:02:04ROOFING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW
 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL
 PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):
  
 A)ROOFING COVER MATERIAL (NOTE: COORDINATE WITH PLANS.
 ELEVATIONS CALL FOR CONCRETE TILE, SECTIONS ON SHEET
 A4.0 CALL METAL ROOFING PANELS, WALL SECTIONS CALL FOR
 SHINGLES UNDER A ROOF TILE NOTE???. REVISE/CLARIFY ALL
 PLANS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 TO AVOID MORE CONFUSION/DEALS PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE
 PRODUCT APPROVALS AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AFTER THE
 PERMIT ISSUED AS MENTIONED ON ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE
 LETTER. COORDINATE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH DESIGNER
 OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ARCHITECT'S LETTER STATING THAT HE APPROVES ALL THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS AND NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
 SUBMITTED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING
 WHICH PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED/APPROVED.
 WHEN PROVIDING A LETTER FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW,
 THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH SPECIFIC
 PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND MODEL.
 A PREFER ALTERNATIVE IS FOR ARCHITECT TO STAMP A REVIEW
 STAMP OR TO WRITE ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE
 REVIEWED/APPROVED. THIS WAY IT WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW
 PROCESS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-11 15:28:34ROOFING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 A)ROOF SHINGLES.
  
 B) ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL L PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:03 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-21 10:04:59ROOFING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 A)ROOF SHINGLES.
  
 B) ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL L PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-14 Time 11:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-14 11:06:50ROOFING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1- PRODUCT APPROVALS
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001
 FOR:
 A)ROOF FINISH MATERIAL.
 -ROOF TILE AND CLEARLY MARK ROOF TILE FASTENING METHOD:
 SCREWS, PADDY SIZE, ETC.
 -SHINGLES.
 -METAL ROOF AND CLEARLY MARK FASTENING METHOD.
  
 B)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEE ONE
 LISTED ON TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 C)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 2- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 12:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2023-02-21 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-12-30 Time 08:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-12-29 Time 17:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 07:31:10MECHANICAL DIGITAL SIGNATURES APPROVED ME
2022-12-29 17:49:37DIGITAL SIGNATURE
  
 1- DRAWINGS A0.1, A1.1, A2.0, A2.2, AND E1 SUBMITTED
 ELECTRONICALLY NEED TO HAVE THE VERIFIABLE DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF RECORD AS
 REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 F.S AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN
 SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2022-07-11 Time 15:28 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-11 15:47:19DIGITAL SIGNATURE
  
 1- ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SUBMITTED
 ELECTRONICALLY NEED TO HAVE THE VERIFIABLE DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF RECORD AS
 REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 F.S AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN
 SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 2- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED NEEDS ORIGINAL
 SEAL/SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN
 SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. PROVIDE
 HARD COPY WITH ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE OR UPLOAD REPORT
 WITH ORIGINAL DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
 DIGITAL SIGNATURES FOR MECHANICAL APPROVED ME
  
2022-05-25 16:05:18DIGITAL SIGNATURES FOR MECHANICAL APPROVED ME
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-12-21 Time 10:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-21 10:07:31DIGITAL SIGNATURE
  
 1- DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY NEED TO HAVE THE
 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S AND CHAPTER 481
 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
  
 2- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED NEEDS ORIGINAL
 SEAL/SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN
 SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. PROVIDE
 HARD COPY WITH ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE OR UPLOAD REPORT
 WITH ORIGINAL DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 NOTE: PLANS/DOCUMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED (OR
 MAILED) TO CITY HALL FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2021-08-20 Time 13:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-08-20 Time 13:08 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-14 11:09:36DIGITAL SIGNATURE
  
 1- DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY NEED TO HAVE THE
 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S AND CHAPTER 481
 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
  
 2- SURVEY NEEDS ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 472 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS. PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH ORIGINAL
 SEAL/SIGNATURE OR UPLOAD SURVEY WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 NOTE: PLANS/DOCUMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED (OR
 MAILED) TO CITY HALL FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
2021-08-20 13:10:33DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED APPEAR TO HAVE A COPY OF AN
 ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER DOCUMENT. PLEASE
 UPLOAD ORIGINAL DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS. SOME OF THE
 DRAWINGS DO NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE FROM THE
 DESIGNER.
  
 PER THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, EACH SHEET OF PLAN
 (INCLUDING THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS) IS REQUIRED TO BE
 SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
 DESIGN. A DIGITAL PLAN REQUIRES A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 WITH THE PROPER THIRD PARTY VERIFICATION. PROVIDE
 CORRECTION. ALTERNATIVELY, A SIGNED/SEALED PAPER SET
 MAY BE SUPPLIED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN ALL
 TRADES ARE APPROVED. WPB FBC 107.1; FS 471/481
 MICHAEL EDWARDS
  
 MECHANICAL EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
 561-805-6728
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2023-02-15 Cont ID  
Sent By ASangele Date 2023-02-15 Time 11:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 2023-02-15 Time 11:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By asangela Date 2022-12-29 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 2022-12-29 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By asangele Date 2022-06-02 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By asangele Date 2022-06-02 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-02 11:23:34FAIL
 PER CITIES ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATIONS
 ARTICLE III. SECTION 94-72
  
 THE SIDE SETBACK: FIVE FEET MINIMUM, 15 FEET TOTAL.
  
 HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM FIRST FLOOR GRADE AND IS
 MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF
  
 AS PREVIOUS COMMENTS STATED SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED
 FOR
 * DRIVEWAY
 * MECHANICAL
 *LANDSCAPE
  
  
  
  
 ALEXIS SANGELEER
 ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By vbroglia Date 2022-02-08 Time 12:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vbroglia Date 2022-02-08 Time 12:36 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-08 12:41:442/8/22 FAILED, PLEASE REVIEW AND ADDRESS PERVIOUS
 COMMENT IN REGARDS TO SEPERATE PERMITS FOR
 GATES/WALL/FENCE, DRIVEWAY, LANDSCAPE, AND MECHANICAL.
 PERMITS MUST FIRST BE SUBMITTED.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE HIEGHT OF THE BULIDNG STARTING FROM
 GRADE.
  
 VALENTINA BROGLIA
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-08-30 Cont ID  
Sent By awooten Date 2021-08-30 Time   Rev Time  
Received By awooten Date 2021-08-30 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-30 10:29:48***************ZONING
 REVIEW****************************
  
 SUBMIT THE LANDSCAPE PLANS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
  
 ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR FENCE/WALL,
 GENERATORS, POOL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 ALANA WOOTEN
 PLANNER
 PLANNING DIVISION
 561-822-1449
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved