Plan Review Details - Permit 21041684
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21041684
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2021-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 15:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2021-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-07-28 Time 15:44 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-29 15:20:56FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, FOURTH REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BOTH FLOOD VENTS SHOWN ON PAGE 7 PHOTOS ARE BIGGER THAN
 THE WALL OPENING. THEY DON'T MATCH THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD DESIGN SHOWN ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4
 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 SINCE THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS ON THE PHOTOS , THERE IS
 NOT WAY OF DETERMINING IF THE WALL OPENING AND THE
 FLOOD VENT ARE THE SAME AS THE ONES SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 PROVIDE WALL OPENING AND VENTS DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH ARCHITECT'S DESIGN. THIS IS IMPORTANT
 BECAUSE THESE VENTS WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM
 OF 913 SQ. IN. CLEAR OPENING VENT. SEE ARCHITECT'S
 DETAILS.
  
 NOTE:
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NOTE:
 THE TOTAL NET OPEN AREA SHALL BE A T LEAST 1 SQ. IN.
 FOR EACH SQ. FT. OF ENCLOSED AREA. SEE ASCE 24-14 SEC.
 2.7.2.1.
  
 NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED SURVEY:
 3- OLD SURVEY SHOWED A GRADE ELEVATION OF 11.4 ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE EXTERIOR WALL NEAR THE LOCATION OF THE
 EXTERIOR FLOOD VENT. THIS WAS OK BECAUSE IT SHOWED THAT
 THE FINISH GRADE WAS A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN THE
 INTERIOR OF THE GARAGE. THE CONCERN NOW IS THAT REVISED
 SURVEY SHOWS GRADE ELEVATIONS OF 14.9 AND 15.0 BY THE
 SAME AREA. THESE ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHER THAN THE
 INTERIOR OF THE GARAGE. THEREFORE, THE FLOOD VENTS SEEM
 TO BE BLOCKED BY THE EXTERIOR GRADE.
 PLEASE, CLARIFY THIS AND REVISE SURVEY AS REQUIRED TO
 SHOW HOW THE FLOOD VENTS ARE GOING TO WORK.
  
 4- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 PROPOSED GRADING OUTSIDE THE FLOOD VENT AREA TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH HIS/HER FLOOD PROOFING DESIGN.
 SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2021-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-25 Time 16:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-25 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-25 16:27:59EMAIL FROM JOSE DIAZ (MSA ARCHITECTS):
  
 MR. GOMEZ,
 THE TRASH ROOM IS A STORAGE ROOM FOR TRASH AND IS
 ACCESSED ONLY BY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL REMOVING THE
 CONTAINERS. RESIDENTS DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE TRASH
 ROOM ITSELF. RESIDENTS ACCESS TO THE TRASH ROOM IS ONLY
 VIA THE RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR AT ELEVATION 16.25', THE
 DFE. BOTH THE CORRIDOR AND TRASH VESTIBULE ARE AT
 16.25'. PLEASE SEE IMAGE BELOW. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THE
 TRASH ROOM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE
 RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING. CAN YOU PLEASE
 RECONSIDER.
  
 JOSE L. DIAZ, RA
 SENIOR ASSOCIATE
 DIRECTOR OF PRODUCTION
 8950 S.W. 74 COURT I SUITE 1513
 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33156
 OFFICE 305.273.9911
 FAX 305.273.9424
 WWW.MSAARCHITECTSINC.COM
  
 *******************************************************
 ******************************************************
 RESPONSE TO JOSE DIAZ:
  
 GOOD AFTERNOON MR. DIAZ,
 TODAY I DISCUSSED YOUR RESPONSE WITH ROBERT BROWN
 (BUILDING OFFICIAL). HE AGREES THIS AREA MAY BE
 CONSIDERED AS AN "ACCESSORY STORAGE" AND YOUR PLANS
 WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY SHOWING THE
 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS. IF THIS ROOM IS NOT LEVELED,
 THEN NEED TO SHOW THE TOP ELEVATIONS AT ALL CORNER
 AREAS AND AT THE TRASH COMPACTOR. FINAL SURVEY AND
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE
 ACTUAL ELEVATIONS.
 ALSO, PROVIDE THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF
 PROPOSED DRY FLOODPROOFING.
  
 NOTE: PLANS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION FOR
 REVIEW AND FEES APPLY. A NEW REVISION NUMBER WILL BE
 ISSUED FOR PROPER TRACKING AND RECORDS RETENTION.
  
 MR. DIAZ, AS PER OUR PHONE CONVERSATION, I AM ATTACHING
 BELOW MY COMMENTS REGARDING THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE.
 THERE ARE SOME ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD.
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS,
 REGARDS,
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 (NOTE: NUMBERING OF COMMENTS WAS REVISED TO SIMPLIFY
 REVIEW. ORIGINAL COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW).
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
 NOTE: SEE REVISION #19110684.
  
 RESPONSE:
 RESPONSE LETTER FROM HUMBERTO BRICENO STATES "THE
 ELEVATION 14.24' WAS TAKEN AT THE THRESHOLD, THE
 MEASURED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS 14.31' NAVD88
 (15.83' NGVD29) WHICH IS THE DESIGN ELEVATION."
  
 THIS COMMENTS APPLY TO HUMBERTO BRICENO'S RESPONSE
 LETTER:
 (A) THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS 16.25'
 NGVD. THEREFORE, 15.83' NGVD29 IS NOT THE DESIGN
 ELEVATION. HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE IS INCORRECT.
  
 (B)TRASH ROOM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 REQUIRED DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. FINISH FLOOR NEEDS TO
 BE RAISED TO MEET THE 16.25' NGVD SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)BASED ON HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE LETTER AND CONVERSATION
 WITH LUIS ORTIZ (SURVEYOR), THE TRASH ROOM HAS AN
 SLOPED FLOOR. IF THE FLOOR IS SLOPED, THEN THE FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION OF 15.83' NGVD29 IS INCORRECT BECAUSE
 THERE ARE LOW AND HIGH ELEVATIONS ON THE SAME ROOM.
 SPOT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN AS DONE
 WITH THE LOADING AREA. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THIS
 ROOM HAS EQUIPMENT THAT NEEDS TO BE LOCATED AT THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY
 PROVIDE THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION WHERE
 THE TRASH ROOM EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 COORDINATE WITH RESPONSE (C) TO ITEM #1 ABOVE. SIMILAR
 SITUATION WITH SLOPED FLOOR.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 3- BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THIS ITEM WAS REVISED, BUT THIS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 AGAIN ONCE ITEM #1 IS ADDRESSED AND IN COMPLIANCE.
 NOTE: REVISE COMMENT C2(E) AT THE BOTTOM OF SECTION D.
 NEED TO IDENTIFY THE EQUIPMENT. "TRASH ROOM" IS NOT AN
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (A)VENTS SHOWN ON THE PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 DON'T MATCH THE
 ONES DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET
 SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 NEED TO INSTALL VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
 (B)BASED ON PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7, IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 PASSAGE FROM THE GARAGE INTERIOR VENT TO THE OUTSIDE
 VENT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN.
 APPROVED REVISION #19110684 SHOWS DETAIL A ON SHEET
 A-2.1 WITH A VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE INTERIOR AND
 EXTERIOR VENTS. THIS DETAIL SHOWS THIS VOID WITH A
 CONCRETE SLAB AS THE FINISH FLOOR. PHOTO #5 SEEMS TO
 SHOW DIRT INSTEAD OF CONCRETE SLAB.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7 LOOKS LIKE IT WAS TAKEN
 WHEN THE BUILDING WAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. PHOTO NEEDS TO BE TAKEN
 WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, INCLUDING THE FINAL
 GRADING.
  
 (D) ALL PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 AND 8 NEED THE DATE WHEN THEY
 ARE TAKEN.
 THEY NEED TO BE TAKEN WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF
 CERTIFICATION. SEE ITEM A6 OF FEMA ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 6- I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS NEW COMMENT, BUT AFTER
 REVIEWING SHEET A-2.1
 TO REVIEW ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL VENTS DESIGN, I REALIZED
 THE SURVEY SHOW SOME PARTITIONS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE. THESE PARTITIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
 ARCHITECT'S PLANS. THESE PARTITIONS SEEM TO BE BLOCKING
 THE FLOOD VENTS. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2021-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-24 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-24 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-24 14:06:22RESPONSE TO DANIEL BARRETT EMAIL DRY FLOODPROOFING
 PROPOSAL:
  
 GOOD AFTERNOON LADIES AND GENTLEMAN,
 ARCHITECT IS PROPOSING DRY FLOODPROOFING. DRY
 FLOODPROOFING IS NOT ALLOWED IN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.
 ASCE 24-14 SEC. 6.2.1 .
  
 ACCORDING TO ASCE 24-14 SEC. 1.5.2 THE TRASH ROOM SHALL
 HAVE THE LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATED TO OR ABOVE THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION (DFE).
  
 ONLY ENCLOSED AREAS THAT ARE USED SOLELY FOR PARKING OF
 VEHICLES, BUILDING ACCESS, OR STORAGE SHALL BE ALLOWED
 BELOW THE DFE.
 TRASH ROOM IS NONE OF THE ABOVE.
  
 I HOPE THIS HELPS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 (NOTE: NUMBERING OF COMMENTS WAS REVISED TO SIMPLIFY
 REVIEW. ORIGINAL COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW).
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
 NOTE: SEE REVISION #19110684.
  
 RESPONSE:
 RESPONSE LETTER FROM HUMBERTO BRICENO STATES "THE
 ELEVATION 14.24' WAS TAKEN AT THE THRESHOLD, THE
 MEASURED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS 14.31' NAVD88
 (15.83' NGVD29) WHICH IS THE DESIGN ELEVATION."
  
 THIS COMMENTS APPLY TO HUMBERTO BRICENO'S RESPONSE
 LETTER:
 (A) THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS 16.25'
 NGVD. THEREFORE, 15.83' NGVD29 IS NOT THE DESIGN
 ELEVATION. HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE IS INCORRECT.
  
 (B)TRASH ROOM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 REQUIRED DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. FINISH FLOOR NEEDS TO
 BE RAISED TO MEET THE 16.25' NGVD SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)BASED ON HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE LETTER AND CONVERSATION
 WITH LUIS ORTIZ (SURVEYOR), THE TRASH ROOM HAS AN
 SLOPED FLOOR. IF THE FLOOR IS SLOPED, THEN THE FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION OF 15.83' NGVD29 IS INCORRECT BECAUSE
 THERE ARE LOW AND HIGH ELEVATIONS ON THE SAME ROOM.
 SPOT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN AS DONE
 WITH THE LOADING AREA. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THIS
 ROOM HAS EQUIPMENT THAT NEEDS TO BE LOCATED AT THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY
 PROVIDE THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION WHERE
 THE TRASH ROOM EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 COORDINATE WITH RESPONSE (C) TO ITEM #1 ABOVE. SIMILAR
 SITUATION WITH SLOPED FLOOR.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 3- BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THIS ITEM WAS REVISED, BUT THIS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 AGAIN ONCE ITEM #1 IS ADDRESSED AND IN COMPLIANCE.
 NOTE: REVISE COMMENT C2(E) AT THE BOTTOM OF SECTION D.
 NEED TO IDENTIFY THE EQUIPMENT. "TRASH ROOM" IS NOT AN
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (A)VENTS SHOWN ON THE PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 DON'T MATCH THE
 ONES DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET
 SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 NEED TO INSTALL VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
 (B)BASED ON PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7, IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 PASSAGE FROM THE GARAGE INTERIOR VENT TO THE OUTSIDE
 VENT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN.
 APPROVED REVISION #19110684 SHOWS DETAIL A ON SHEET
 A-2.1 WITH A VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE INTERIOR AND
 EXTERIOR VENTS. THIS DETAIL SHOWS THIS VOID WITH A
 CONCRETE SLAB AS THE FINISH FLOOR. PHOTO #5 SEEMS TO
 SHOW DIRT INSTEAD OF CONCRETE SLAB.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7 LOOKS LIKE IT WAS TAKEN
 WHEN THE BUILDING WAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. PHOTO NEEDS TO BE TAKEN
 WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, INCLUDING THE FINAL
 GRADING.
  
 (D) ALL PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 AND 8 NEED THE DATE WHEN THEY
 ARE TAKEN.
 THEY NEED TO BE TAKEN WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF
 CERTIFICATION. SEE ITEM A6 OF FEMA ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 6- I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS NEW COMMENT, BUT AFTER
 REVIEWING SHEET A-2.1
 TO REVIEW ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL VENTS DESIGN, I REALIZED
 THE SURVEY SHOW SOME PARTITIONS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE. THESE PARTITIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
 ARCHITECT'S PLANS. THESE PARTITIONS SEEM TO BE BLOCKING
 THE FLOOD VENTS. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2021-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 18:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-19 18:40:02FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 (NOTE: NUMBERING OF COMMENTS WAS REVISED TO SIMPLIFY
 REVIEW. ORIGINAL COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW).
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
 NOTE: SEE REVISION #19110684.
  
 RESPONSE:
 RESPONSE LETTER FROM HUMBERTO BRICENO STATES "THE
 ELEVATION 14.24' WAS TAKEN AT THE THRESHOLD, THE
 MEASURED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS 14.31' NAVD88
 (15.83' NGVD29) WHICH IS THE DESIGN ELEVATION."
  
 THIS COMMENTS APPLY TO HUMBERTO BRICENO'S RESPONSE
 LETTER:
 (A) THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS 16.25'
 NGVD. THEREFORE, 15.83' NGVD29 IS NOT THE DESIGN
 ELEVATION. HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE IS INCORRECT.
  
 (B)TRASH ROOM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 REQUIRED DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. FINISH FLOOR NEEDS TO
 BE RAISED TO MEET THE 16.25' NGVD SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)BASED ON HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE LETTER AND CONVERSATION
 WITH LUIS ORTIZ (SURVEYOR), THE TRASH ROOM HAS AN
 SLOPED FLOOR. IF THE FLOOR IS SLOPED, THEN THE FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION OF 15.83' NGVD29 IS INCORRECT BECAUSE
 THERE ARE LOW AND HIGH ELEVATIONS ON THE SAME ROOM.
 SPOT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN AS DONE
 WITH THE LOADING AREA. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THIS
 ROOM HAS EQUIPMENT THAT NEEDS TO BE LOCATED AT THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY
 PROVIDE THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION WHERE
 THE TRASH ROOM EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 COORDINATE WITH RESPONSE (C) TO ITEM #1 ABOVE. SIMILAR
 SITUATION WITH SLOPED FLOOR.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 3- BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THIS ITEM WAS REVISED, BUT THIS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 AGAIN ONCE ITEM #1 IS ADDRESSED AND IN COMPLIANCE.
 NOTE: REVISE COMMENT C2(E) AT THE BOTTOM OF SECTION D.
 NEED TO IDENTIFY THE EQUIPMENT. "TRASH ROOM" IS NOT AN
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (A)VENTS SHOWN ON THE PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 DON'T MATCH THE
 ONES DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET
 SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 NEED TO INSTALL VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
 (B)BASED ON PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7, IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 PASSAGE FROM THE GARAGE INTERIOR VENT TO THE OUTSIDE
 VENT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN.
 APPROVED REVISION #19110684 SHOWS DETAIL A ON SHEET
 A-2.1 WITH A VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE INTERIOR AND
 EXTERIOR VENTS. THIS DETAIL SHOWS THIS VOID WITH A
 CONCRETE SLAB AS THE FINISH FLOOR. PHOTO #5 SEEMS TO
 SHOW DIRT INSTEAD OF CONCRETE SLAB.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7 LOOKS LIKE IT WAS TAKEN
 WHEN THE BUILDING WAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. PHOTO NEEDS TO BE TAKEN
 WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, INCLUDING THE FINAL
 GRADING.
  
 (D) ALL PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 AND 8 NEED THE DATE WHEN THEY
 ARE TAKEN.
 THEY NEED TO BE TAKEN WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF
 CERTIFICATION. SEE ITEM A6 OF FEMA ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 6- I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS NEW COMMENT, BUT AFTER
 REVIEWING SHEET A-2.1
 TO REVIEW ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL VENTS DESIGN, I REALIZED
 THE SURVEY SHOW SOME PARTITIONS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE. THESE PARTITIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
 ARCHITECT'S PLANS. THESE PARTITIONS SEEM TO BE BLOCKING
 THE FLOOD VENTS. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-05-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 19:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 13:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-14 19:43:06FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISE INFORMATION ENTERED IN SECTION C2:
 (A) THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SURVEY FOR THE
 ELEVATION AT THE LOADING AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING. ACCORDING TO PLANS, THE ELEVATION AT THE
 ENTRANCE OF THE LOADING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE REST OF
 THE FLOOR. THIS LOOKS LIKE THE TOP OF BOTTOM FLOOR.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ELEVATIONS IN THE LOADING
 AREA. (INCLUDE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM, TRASH ROOM, DOMESTIC
 PUMP ROOM).
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (1)REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
  
 (2)CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (3)CLARIFY WHY LOADING AREA F.F.E.=14.12 AND THERE IS
 AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.62 SHOWN AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE
 LOADING AREA.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 (B)OK.
 (C)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (D)ACCORDING TO FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE
 THE TOP OF ATTACHED GARAGE ELEVATION IS TAKEN AT A
 MIDPOINT OF THE GARAGE RAMP. THE LOWEST ELEVATION OF
 THE GARAGE IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GARAGE. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 GARAGE ELEVATION WAS CHANGED, BUT THE LOCATION WHERE
 THIS ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS MISLEADING. THIS ELEVATION
 IS SHOWN AT MID POINT OF THE GARAGE. THIS GARAGE HAS
 DIFFERENT LEVELS AND THE POINT WHERE THE REVISED
 ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS HIGHER THAN THE NUMBER SHOWN.
 TYPICALLY, THE ELEVATIONS ARE MARKED AT THE POINT WHERE
 THE ELEVATION IS TAKEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NEW COMMENT TO THIS ITEM:
 (E)BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (F)OK.
 (G)OK.
 (H)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (1)ONLY THE INSIDE VENT WAS SHOWN. NEED PHOTO SHOWING
 THE OUTSIDE VENT THAT CONNECTS TO THE INSIDE VENT.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (2)VENT SHOWN ON THE PHOTO DOESN'T SEEM TO MATCH THE
 ONE DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET SHEET
 A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. DESIGNER OF
 RECORD NEEDS TO REVISE VENT DESIGN OR CONTRACTOR NEEDS
 TO INSTALL VENT THAT MATCHES THE ONE DESIGNED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 3- OK.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
 4- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
 ***********************
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-05-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-06 Time 15:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-05 Time 13:26 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 15:49:35FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 1- REVISE INFORMATION ENTERED IN SECTION C2:
 (A) THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SURVEY FOR THE
 ELEVATION AT THE LOADING AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING. ACCORDING TO PLANS, THE ELEVATION AT THE
 ENTRANCE OF THE LOADING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE REST OF
 THE FLOOR. THIS LOOKS LIKE THE TOP OF BOTTOM FLOOR.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ELEVATIONS IN THE LOADING
 AREA. (INCLUDE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM, TRASH ROOM, DOMESTIC
 PUMP ROOM).
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (B) COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (C)OK.
  
 (D)ACCORDING TO FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE
 THE TOP OF ATTACHED GARAGE ELEVATION IS TAKEN AT A
 MIDPOINT OF THE GARAGE RAMP. THE LOWEST ELEVATION OF
 THE GARAGE IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GARAGE. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 ALSO, REVISE ELEVATION 12.4. ACCORDING TO SURVEY THIS
 ELEVATION IS 12.38. THE ELEVATION NEEDS TO BE ENTERED
 TO THE NEAREST TENTH OF A FOOT AS REQUIRED BY ITEM C2
 OF FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS. THEREFORE,
 THE CORRECT ROUNDING WILL BE 12.0 NOT 12.4.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (E)OK.
  
 (F)SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT
 GRADE NEXT TO THE BUILDING. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE
 SURVEY WITH INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (G)SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW THE HIGHEST ADJACENT
 GRADE NEXT TO THE BUILDING. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE
 SURVEY WITH INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (H) SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW ELEVATION OF DECK OR
 STAIRS. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE SURVEY WITH
 INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 2- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
  
 3- FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED:
 A) PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ALL THE ELEVATIONS
 REFERENCED IN THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. COORDINATE
 WITH ITEM #1.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) THE POOL SHOWS A TOP OF POOL FORM-BOARD ELEVATION OF
 14.49'. CLARIFY WHY IT IS A FORM-BOARD ELEVATION IF
 THIS IS A FINAL SURVEY.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2021-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-03 Time 13:50 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2021-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-07-22 Time 15:39 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2021-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-25 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-25 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2021-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-24 Time 14:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-24 Time 14:02 Sent To I
Notes
2021-05-24 14:05:51DANIEL BARRETT EMAILED DRY FLOODPROOFING PROPOSAL. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2021-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 18:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 06:33 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2021-05-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 19:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2021-05-11 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-05-03 Time 12:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2021-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2021-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-29 15:21:26FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, FOURTH REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BOTH FLOOD VENTS SHOWN ON PAGE 7 PHOTOS ARE BIGGER THAN
 THE WALL OPENING. THEY DON'T MATCH THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD DESIGN SHOWN ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4
 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 SINCE THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS ON THE PHOTOS , THERE IS
 NOT WAY OF DETERMINING IF THE WALL OPENING AND THE
 FLOOD VENT ARE THE SAME AS THE ONES SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 PROVIDE WALL OPENING AND VENTS DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH ARCHITECT'S DESIGN. THIS IS IMPORTANT
 BECAUSE THESE VENTS WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM
 OF 913 SQ. IN. CLEAR OPENING VENT. SEE ARCHITECT'S
 DETAILS.
  
 NOTE:
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NOTE:
 THE TOTAL NET OPEN AREA SHALL BE A T LEAST 1 SQ. IN.
 FOR EACH SQ. FT. OF ENCLOSED AREA. SEE ASCE 24-14 SEC.
 2.7.2.1.
  
 NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED SURVEY:
 3- OLD SURVEY SHOWED A GRADE ELEVATION OF 11.4 ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE EXTERIOR WALL NEAR THE LOCATION OF THE
 EXTERIOR FLOOD VENT. THIS WAS OK BECAUSE IT SHOWED THAT
 THE FINISH GRADE WAS A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN THE
 INTERIOR OF THE GARAGE. THE CONCERN NOW IS THAT REVISED
 SURVEY SHOWS GRADE ELEVATIONS OF 14.9 AND 15.0 BY THE
 SAME AREA. THESE ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHER THAN THE
 INTERIOR OF THE GARAGE. THEREFORE, THE FLOOD VENTS SEEM
 TO BE BLOCKED BY THE EXTERIOR GRADE.
 PLEASE, CLARIFY THIS AND REVISE SURVEY AS REQUIRED TO
 SHOW HOW THE FLOOD VENTS ARE GOING TO WORK.
  
 4- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 PROPOSED GRADING OUTSIDE THE FLOOD VENT AREA TO VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE WITH HIS/HER FLOOD PROOFING DESIGN.
 SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2021-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 18:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 18:42 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-19 18:42:59FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 (NOTE: NUMBERING OF COMMENTS WAS REVISED TO SIMPLIFY
 REVIEW. ORIGINAL COMMENT IS THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW).
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
 NOTE: SEE REVISION #19110684.
  
 RESPONSE:
 RESPONSE LETTER FROM HUMBERTO BRICENO STATES "THE
 ELEVATION 14.24' WAS TAKEN AT THE THRESHOLD, THE
 MEASURED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS 14.31' NAVD88
 (15.83' NGVD29) WHICH IS THE DESIGN ELEVATION."
  
 THIS COMMENTS APPLY TO HUMBERTO BRICENO'S RESPONSE
 LETTER:
 (A) THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS 16.25'
 NGVD. THEREFORE, 15.83' NGVD29 IS NOT THE DESIGN
 ELEVATION. HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE IS INCORRECT.
  
 (B)TRASH ROOM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 REQUIRED DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. FINISH FLOOR NEEDS TO
 BE RAISED TO MEET THE 16.25' NGVD SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)BASED ON HUMBERTO'S RESPONSE LETTER AND CONVERSATION
 WITH LUIS ORTIZ (SURVEYOR), THE TRASH ROOM HAS AN
 SLOPED FLOOR. IF THE FLOOR IS SLOPED, THEN THE FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION OF 15.83' NGVD29 IS INCORRECT BECAUSE
 THERE ARE LOW AND HIGH ELEVATIONS ON THE SAME ROOM.
 SPOT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN AS DONE
 WITH THE LOADING AREA. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THIS
 ROOM HAS EQUIPMENT THAT NEEDS TO BE LOCATED AT THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY
 PROVIDE THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION WHERE
 THE TRASH ROOM EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 COORDINATE WITH RESPONSE (C) TO ITEM #1 ABOVE. SIMILAR
 SITUATION WITH SLOPED FLOOR.
  
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 3- BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 THIS ITEM WAS REVISED, BUT THIS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 AGAIN ONCE ITEM #1 IS ADDRESSED AND IN COMPLIANCE.
 NOTE: REVISE COMMENT C2(E) AT THE BOTTOM OF SECTION D.
 NEED TO IDENTIFY THE EQUIPMENT. "TRASH ROOM" IS NOT AN
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 4- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (A)VENTS SHOWN ON THE PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 DON'T MATCH THE
 ONES DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET
 SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1.
 NEED TO INSTALL VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 NOTE:THERE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-ENGINEERED
 VENTS. SEE SEC. 2.7.2.1 ASCE 24.
  
 (B)BASED ON PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7, IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 PASSAGE FROM THE GARAGE INTERIOR VENT TO THE OUTSIDE
 VENT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN.
 APPROVED REVISION #19110684 SHOWS DETAIL A ON SHEET
 A-2.1 WITH A VOID SPACE BETWEEN THE INTERIOR AND
 EXTERIOR VENTS. THIS DETAIL SHOWS THIS VOID WITH A
 CONCRETE SLAB AS THE FINISH FLOOR. PHOTO #5 SEEMS TO
 SHOW DIRT INSTEAD OF CONCRETE SLAB.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 (C)PHOTO #5 SHOWN ON PAGE 7 LOOKS LIKE IT WAS TAKEN
 WHEN THE BUILDING WAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS A
 FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. PHOTO NEEDS TO BE TAKEN
 WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, INCLUDING THE FINAL
 GRADING.
  
 (D) ALL PHOTOS ON PAGE 7 AND 8 NEED THE DATE WHEN THEY
 ARE TAKEN.
 THEY NEED TO BE TAKEN WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF
 CERTIFICATION. SEE ITEM A6 OF FEMA ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 BASED ON THE REVISED NET AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NET
 AREA DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE NET AREA SPECIFIED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON FLOOD VENT CALCULATIONS ON SHEET
 A-2.1.
 THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4
 ABOVE.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 6- I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS NEW COMMENT, BUT AFTER
 REVIEWING SHEET A-2.1
 TO REVIEW ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL VENTS DESIGN, I REALIZED
 THE SURVEY SHOW SOME PARTITIONS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE. THESE PARTITIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE
 ARCHITECT'S PLANS. THESE PARTITIONS SEEM TO BE BLOCKING
 THE FLOOD VENTS. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.
 IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED PLANS, THEN
 THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BY
 REVISING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-05-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 19:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-14 Time 19:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-14 19:46:51FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 1- REVISE INFORMATION ENTERED IN SECTION C2:
 (A) THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SURVEY FOR THE
 ELEVATION AT THE LOADING AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING. ACCORDING TO PLANS, THE ELEVATION AT THE
 ENTRANCE OF THE LOADING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE REST OF
 THE FLOOR. THIS LOOKS LIKE THE TOP OF BOTTOM FLOOR.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ELEVATIONS IN THE LOADING
 AREA. (INCLUDE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM, TRASH ROOM, DOMESTIC
 PUMP ROOM).
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (1)REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE
 DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED
 ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH
 ELEVATION.
 SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24.
  
 (2)CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71
 SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE
 ENTRY OF THIS ROOM.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (3)CLARIFY WHY LOADING AREA F.F.E.=14.12 AND THERE IS
 AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.62 SHOWN AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE
 LOADING AREA.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 (B)OK.
 (C)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (D)ACCORDING TO FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE
 THE TOP OF ATTACHED GARAGE ELEVATION IS TAKEN AT A
 MIDPOINT OF THE GARAGE RAMP. THE LOWEST ELEVATION OF
 THE GARAGE IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GARAGE. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 GARAGE ELEVATION WAS CHANGED, BUT THE LOCATION WHERE
 THIS ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS MISLEADING. THIS ELEVATION
 IS SHOWN AT MID POINT OF THE GARAGE. THIS GARAGE HAS
 DIFFERENT LEVELS AND THE POINT WHERE THE REVISED
 ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS HIGHER THAN THE NUMBER SHOWN.
 TYPICALLY, THE ELEVATIONS ARE MARKED AT THE POINT WHERE
 THE ELEVATION IS TAKEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NEW COMMENT TO THIS ITEM:
 (E)BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE
 LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE
 GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (F)OK.
 (G)OK.
 (H)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 (1)ONLY THE INSIDE VENT WAS SHOWN. NEED PHOTO SHOWING
 THE OUTSIDE VENT THAT CONNECTS TO THE INSIDE VENT.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (2)VENT SHOWN ON THE PHOTO DOESN'T SEEM TO MATCH THE
 ONE DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET SHEET
 A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. DESIGNER OF
 RECORD NEEDS TO REVISE VENT DESIGN OR CONTRACTOR NEEDS
 TO INSTALL VENT THAT MATCHES THE ONE DESIGNED BY THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 3- OK.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
 4- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET
 AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH
 COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON
 SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN
 FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE
 ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED
 VENTS.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
 ***********************
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-05-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-06 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-06 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 15:58:15FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REVIEW COMMENTS:
 SUBMITTAL #21041684
  
 1- REVISE INFORMATION ENTERED IN SECTION C2:
 (A) THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SURVEY FOR THE
 ELEVATION AT THE LOADING AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING. ACCORDING TO PLANS, THE ELEVATION AT THE
 ENTRANCE OF THE LOADING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE REST OF
 THE FLOOR. THIS LOOKS LIKE THE TOP OF BOTTOM FLOOR.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ELEVATIONS IN THE LOADING
 AREA. (INCLUDE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM, TRASH ROOM, DOMESTIC
 PUMP ROOM).
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (B) COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (C)OK.
  
 (D)ACCORDING TO FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE
 THE TOP OF ATTACHED GARAGE ELEVATION IS TAKEN AT A
 MIDPOINT OF THE GARAGE RAMP. THE LOWEST ELEVATION OF
 THE GARAGE IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GARAGE. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 ALSO, REVISE ELEVATION 12.4. ACCORDING TO SURVEY THIS
 ELEVATION IS 12.38. THE ELEVATION NEEDS TO BE ENTERED
 TO THE NEAREST TENTH OF A FOOT AS REQUIRED BY ITEM C2
 OF FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS. THEREFORE,
 THE CORRECT ROUNDING WILL BE 12.0 NOT 12.4.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (E)OK.
  
 (F)SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT
 GRADE NEXT TO THE BUILDING. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE
 SURVEY WITH INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (G)SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW THE HIGHEST ADJACENT
 GRADE NEXT TO THE BUILDING. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE
 SURVEY WITH INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 (H) SURVEY SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW ELEVATION OF DECK OR
 STAIRS. UNABLE TO VERIFY. PROVIDE SURVEY WITH
 INFORMATION.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 2- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 A9(B).
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND
 DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT
 INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE
 OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6
 FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS.
 ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE
 PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6.
  
 SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION
 #19110684 CITY RECORDS.
  
  
 3- FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED:
 A) PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ALL THE ELEVATIONS
 REFERENCED IN THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. COORDINATE
 WITH ITEM #1.
 SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) THE POOL SHOWS A TOP OF POOL FORM-BOARD ELEVATION OF
 14.49'. CLARIFY WHY IT IS A FORM-BOARD ELEVATION IF
 THIS IS A FINAL SURVEY.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2021-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-09-08 Time 16:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2021-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-07-29 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 09:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-19 Time 09:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-05-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2021-05-05 Time 15:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2021-05-05 Time 15:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2021-05-11 Time 14:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2021-05-11 Time 13:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved