| 2021-06-16 14:08:37 | COMMENTS UPDATED 07/07/21 AND EMAILED TO VICTOR |
| | VELASQUEZ. |
| | THERE IS A CONCERN ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THE BEAM AND |
| | COLUMNS SUPPORTING THE WEIGHT OF PROPOSED 8" CONCRETE |
| | SLAB (THIS WAS DISCUSSED WITH ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL): |
| | 1- SECOND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB: |
| | A)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW AN 8" CONCRETE SLAB TO BE |
| | SUPPORTED ON 8X20 CONCRETE BEAM AND 3-1/4 X 3-1/4 X 1/4 |
| | TUBE COLUMNS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE |
| | STEEL REINFORCEMENT SPECIFIED FOR THE CONCRETE BEAM |
| | (2#5 BARS ON TOP AND 2#7 BARS AT BOTTOM)IS ADEQUATE TO |
| | TRANSFER THE BENDING MOMENT OF THE CONTINUOUS CONCRETE |
| | BEAM AT THE STEEL COLUMNS. ALSO, CHECK THE BUCKLING OF |
| | THE TUBE COLUMNS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | B)FOUNDATION PLAN IS MISSING THE FOOTING FOR COLUMN |
| | SUPPORTING THE REAR END OF 8X20 CONCRETE BEAM. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | C)CLARIFY WHY COLUMN SUPPORTING THE REAR END OF 8X20 |
| | CONCRETE BEAM IS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE SPECIFIED AT |
| | THE FRONT END. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS UPDATED 06/22/21. |
| | GOOD AFTERNOON MR. VELASQUEZ, |
| | THE ANSWER IS YES. YOU NEED TO PROVIDE AN APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS THE FIRE RATING SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| | THE ASSEMBLY NEEDS TO BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM |
| | E119 OR UL 263 OR ANY OTHER METHOD DESCRIBED IN SEC. |
| | 703.3 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | 1) ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE A FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY FOR |
| | FIRST FLOOR EXTERIOR WALL SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR |
| | ASSEMBLY SPECIFIED ON TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND |
| | BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| | I APOLOGIZE, I MEANT TO ADD THIS IN MY COMMENTS, BUT |
| | SOMEHOW I DIDN'T DO IT. NOW THAT I HAVE A SECOND CHANCE |
| | TO READ THE COMMENTS I REALIZED THIS. I WILL UPDATE MY |
| | COMMENTS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 2)ALSO, PROVIDE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | MONOLITHIC BEAM SUPPORTING THE 8" CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN |
| | ON THE TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| | I APOLOGIZE, I MEANT TO ADD THIS IN MY COMMENTS, BUT |
| | SOMEHOW I DIDN'T DO IT. NOW THAT I HAVE A SECOND CHANCE |
| | TO READ THE COMMENTS I REALIZED THIS. I WILL UPDATE MY |
| | COMMENTS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW DUPLEX (R3) BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21041108 |
| | |
| | 1- INTERIOR STEEL COLUMNS SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR |
| | CONCRETE SLAB NEED TO BE FIRE RATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R302.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED ASSEMBLIES SHOWING FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2- SECOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED ASSEMBLIES SHOWING FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE COMPLIANCE THRU FLOOR ASSEMBLY PENETRATIONS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 302.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 3- LOT DRAINAGE: |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (FIRST FLOOR): |
| | A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER?S LEGALLY |
| | DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | B)DESIGN LOCATION SPECIFIED ON TOP OF FORM 405-2020 AND |
| | UNDER CLIMATE HEADING ON PAGE 2 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THIS |
| | HOUSE IS NOT IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. NEED CORRECT LOCATION AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)ITEM #2 IS NOT CLEAR. ITEM #2 IS ASKING IF "SINGLE |
| | FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY". WHAT IS "DETACHED". REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE CORRECT ANSWER. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)ITEM #5 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | F)CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SPECIFIED ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH AREA SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S PLANS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G)CEILING INFORMATION ON ITEM #11 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | THE AREA. THE CEILING OF THE FIRST FLOOR IS THE SECOND |
| | FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND IT IS NOT VENTED. ALSO, |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DON'T SPECIFY INSULATION. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | H)ROOF INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| | WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS FOR SECOND FLOOR ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. SEE CORRECT ROOF TYPE AND ROOFING |
| | MATERIAL. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | I)ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THERE |
| | IS NOT ATTIC ON THE FIRST FLOOR. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| | WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | J)CEILING INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THE |
| | CEILING ON FIRST FLOOR IS CONCRETE NOT WOOD. SEE PLANS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| | WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | K)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| | ACCORDING TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, ENTRY |
| | DOORS HAVE A LARGE GLASS PANEL. SEE PLANS. THIS DOOR |
| | SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW/GLAZING AREA AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | L) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE WINDOW ORIENTATION, WINDOW AREA AND |
| | WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO MATCH |
| | ARCHITECT'S PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | M)BUILDER TO COMPLETE AND SIGN THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (SECOND FLOOR): |
| | A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER?S LEGALLY |
| | DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | B)DESIGN LOCATION SPECIFIED ON TOP OF FORM 405-2020 AND |
| | UNDER CLIMATE HEADING ON PAGE 2 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THIS |
| | HOUSE IS NOT IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. NEED CORRECT LOCATION AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)ITEM #2 IS NOT CLEAR. ITEM #2 IS ASKING IF "SINGLE |
| | FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY". WHAT IS "DETACHED". REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE CORRECT ANSWER. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)ITEM #5 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | F)CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SPECIFIED ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH AREA SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S PLANS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G)CEILING INFORMATION ON ITEM #11 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | THE CEILING AREA. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | H)ROOF INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. TYPE OF |
| | ROOF IS NOT GABLE. THE ROOFING MATERIAL IS NOT BARREL |
| | TILE. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | I)ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| | TYPICALLY VENT RATIO IS 1/150. SEE SEC. R806.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | (PLANS DON'T SHOW VENTILATION RATIO OF 1/300 AS ALLOWED |
| | BY THE EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | J)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| | ACCORDING TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, ENTRY |
| | DOORS HAVE A LARGE GLASS PANEL. SEE PLANS. THIS DOOR |
| | SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW/GLAZING AREA AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | K) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE WINDOW ORIENTATION, WINDOW AREA AND |
| | WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO MATCH |
| | ARCHITECT'S PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | L)BUILDER TO COMPLETE AND SIGN THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS SHOWING COMPLIANCE TABLE |
| | R301.5, SEC. R311.7.8 AND SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR. |
| | B)SLIDING GLASS DOORS. |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS |
| | D)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | E)ROOF RIDGE VENT. SEE ROOF RIDGE DETAIL ON SHEET A-5. |
| | F)SHUTTERS WITH COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IF DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR SECOND FLOOR |
| | FINISH FLOOR. NEED FLOOR SOUND INSULATION BETWEEN |
| | DWELLING UNITS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 105.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | THE FOLLOWING FLOOR SOUND INFORMATION MAY BE SUBMITTED |
| | LATER AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL WHEN REVIEWED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT OF RECORD: |
| | FLOORING SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: |
| | A) PROVIDE COPY OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE |
| | DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 |
| | OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 7TH EDITION |
| | (2020). |
| | B) PROVIDE COPY OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS (STC) |
| | TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 7TH EDITION (2020). |
| | C) PROVIDE COPY OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) |
| | TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 7TH EDITION (2020). |
| | |
| | 9- WINDOWS AND DOORS DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 ARE MISSING |
| | THE STRUCTURAL BUCK FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS. DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY FASTENER TYPE, SIZE AND |
| | SPACING. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 10- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $359,252. THE |
| | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1825.90. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |