| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21030029 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
09:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
Time |
11:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-19 11:54:07 | BOAT DOCK | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | | AMENDMENT | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) THERE ARE 2 SETS OF DOCK PLANS - ONE SIGNED BY | | | MICHAEL BARBER P.E. AND ONE SIGNED BY CHARLES A. DARDEN | | | JR. P.E. - PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE SET - PLEASE E MAIL | | | THE [email protected] AND ASK THEM TO REMOVE THE | | | ONE NOT NEEDED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-21 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-21 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-03-18 |
Time |
07:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-03-18 |
Time |
07:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-18 08:00:15 | NEED ZONING APPROVAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
2022-03-23 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
2022-03-23 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-23 12:53:31 | PLEASE ADDRESS ZONING COMMENST. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
2021-03-16 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
2021-03-16 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-16 12:38:39 | PLEASE ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-05-04 |
Time |
08:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-15 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-03-18 |
Time |
08:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
14:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-05 09:36:11 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) DRAWINGS FROM CSM ENGINEERING SIGNED BY CHARLES | | | A.DARDEN JR. 1 OF 3, 2 OF 3 AND 3 OF 3 DO NOT SHOW AS | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED IN ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-19 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-19 11:57:29 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) ALL SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS EXCEPT FOR THE | | | DRAWINGS NOTED BELOW BY (JG) DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY | | | SIGNED IN ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | | | 2022-04-18 15:44:16 | 04/18/22 THIS SIGNATURE REVIEW IS ONLY FOR HARD COPIES | | | OF ENGINEER DRAWINGS 1 OF 4 THRU 4 OF 4 FROM MCR | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, INC. SUBMITTED ON 04/15/22. | | | THESE DRAWINGS HAVE ENGINEER'S EMBOSSED SEAL AND WET | | | SIGNATURE. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-17 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-17 14:34:19 | 3/17/22 REVIEW OF SIGNATURE ON PAPER PLANS PASSED AND | | | ROUTED TO STORAGE.M.P. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-03-05 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-05 15:57:56 | THE DRAWINGS DATED 11/23/20 ARE COPIES OF THE DESIGNERS | | | SIGNATURE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER DRAWINGS TO OUR OFFICE. | | | | | | PER THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, EACH SHEET OF PLAN | | | (INCLUDING THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS) IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE | | | DESIGN. A DIGITAL PLAN REQUIRES A DIGITAL SIGNATURE | | | WITH THE PROPER THIRD PARTY VERIFICATION. PROVIDE | | | CORRECTION. ALTERNATIVELY, A SIGNED/SEALED PAPER SET | | | MAY BE SUPPLIED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN ALL | | | TRADES ARE APPROVED. WPB FBC 107.1; FS 471/481 | | | | | | MICHAEL EDWARDS | | | MECHANICAL EXAMINER | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401 | | | 561-805-6728 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-10 11:30:33 | 5/10/22 ? PASSED | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LENGTH OF THE DOCK (162 FT) EXCEEDS THE | | | LIMITS OF THE CODE (A MAXIMUM OF 100 FEET). [SATISFIED | | | PER REVISION, WHICH PROVIDES FURTHER CLARIFICATION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 33-22] | | | | | | APPLICANT WILL NEED TO APPLY FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION | | | CLASS A PERMIT TO GAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY | | | COMMISSION TO EXTEND PASS 100 FEET. [SATISFIED PER | | | RESOLUTION NO. 33-22] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS BUILDING AND SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-04-25 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-25 08:43:15 | 4/25/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LENGTH OF THE DOCK (162 FT) EXCEEDS THE | | | LIMITS OF THE CODE (A MAXIMUM OF 100 FEET). [SATISFIED | | | PER REVISION, WHICH PROVIDES FURTHER CLARIFICATION IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 33-22] | | | | | | APPLICANT WILL NEED TO APPLY FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION | | | CLASS A PERMIT TO GAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY | | | COMMISSION TO EXTEND PASS 100 FEET. [SATISFIED PER | | | RESOLUTION NO. 33-22] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS BUILDING AND SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
2022-03-30 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-03-30 10:26:06 | 3/30/22 ? FAILED | | | | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LENGTH OF THE DOCK (162 FT) EXCEEDS THE | | | LIMITS OF THE CODE (A MAXIMUM OF 100 FEET). | | | | | | APPLICANT WILL NEED TO APPLY FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION | | | CLASS A PERMIT TO GAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY | | | COMMISSION TO EXTEND PASS 100 FEET. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
awooten |
Date |
2021-03-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
awooten |
Date |
2021-03-12 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-12 14:26:07 | *************************ZONING REVIEW | | | FAILED************************* | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LENGTH OF THE DOCK (162 FT) EXCEEDS THE | | | LIMITS OF THE CODE (A MAXIMUM OF 100 FEET). | | | | | | APPLICANT WILL NEED TO APPLY FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION | | | CLASS A PERMIT TO GAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY | | | COMMISSION TO EXTEND PASS 100 FEET. | | | | | | ALANA WOOTEN | | | PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | 561-822-1449 | | | [email protected] |
|
|