Plan Review Details - Permit 21010664
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21010664
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-01-05 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-01-05 Time 12:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2021-12-15 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2021-12-15 Time 13:26 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-05-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2021-05-04 Time 15:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2021-05-04 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-04 15:31:34ANTENNA
 REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON
 561-805-6716
 [email protected].
 CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1
 AMENDMENT
  
 CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE THE STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND
 CALCULATIONS FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR THE POLE
 AND MOUNTED ANTENNA SHOWING FOUNDATION AND ATTACHMENTS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE WIND LOADS PER FBC 1609
 2) WIND SPEED USED FOR DESIGN SHOULD BE 170MPH FOR A
 RISK CATEGORY II PER FBC WPB SECTION 120.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-07-08 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-07-08 Time 13:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By equinone Date 2021-04-27 Time 10:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By equinone Date 2021-04-27 Time 10:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By equinone Date 2021-02-09 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By equinone Date 2021-02-09 Time 15:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-10-03 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-10-03 Time 09:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-06-23 Time 09:50 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-01-05 Time 12:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-12-07 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2021-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2021-05-25 Time 16:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-04-20 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By equinone Date 2021-02-09 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By equinone Date 2021-01-27 Time 12:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-07-08 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-07-08 Time 13:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2021-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2021-12-15 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2021-12-15 Time 13:26 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-15 13:29:18SIGNATURE REVIEW
  
 DRAWING LABELED "RAYCAP_POLE DESIGN_32-FOOT
 POLE-09-28-2021.PDF" DOES NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED
 IN ADOBE READER -
  
 SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR
 ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A
 CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED
 A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF
 E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES
 NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN
 DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED
 DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING
 DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL.
  
 REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON
 561-805-6716
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2021-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By equinone Date 2021-04-27 Time 10:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By equinone Date 2021-04-27 Time 10:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By equinone Date 2021-02-09 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By equinone Date 2021-02-09 Time 15:55 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-09 15:55:41CODES IN EFFECT
 CODES IN EFFECT:
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2020
 7TH ED, CHAPTER 1.
 FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020
 7TH EDITION
 FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION
 NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
 FS = FLORIDA STATUTES
 FAC = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW:
  
 FS471, FS481, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A DIGITALLY
 SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN ORIGINAL, PDF MUST
 HAVE THE INTEGRATED DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 EITHER SUBMIT A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED
 PLAN, OR YOU CAN MAIL (OR DROP OFF) ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED
 AND SEALED PAPER ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE.
  
 ENRIQUE QUINONEZ P.E.
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 CITY OF WEST PAM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 1ST FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS,
 561-805-6746.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 2022-09-29 Time 10:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 2022-09-29 Time 10:52 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-29 10:53:021. THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO
 THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS INCLUDED WITH
 THIS ELECTRICAL PERMIT MUST MATCH THE PLANS APPROVED
 WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED PERMIT. SOME OF THE COMMENTS
 BELOW ARE INCLUDED ON THE PLACEMENT PERMIT REVIEW AS
 WELL AS WITH THIS PERMIT.
  
  
 9.29.22 ZONING REVIEW - 19020395 128 @ EVERNIA WPB NODE
 11
 1. TOPOGRAPHIC SITE SURVEY HAS CALLOUT FOR PROPOSED
 POLE LOCATION, BUT DOESN???T NOT PROVIDE LEADER OR
 CLARIFY WHICH ELEMENT IS THE PROPOSED POLE. SITE PLAN
 PROVIDES THE CALLOUT/LEADER.
  
 2. PROPOSED POLE LOCATION SHOWN TO POTENTIALLY CONFLICT
 WITH EXISTING PRIVATE COMMUNICATION LINE, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE NECESSARY UTILITY LETTERS GRANTING
 APPROVAL/NO OBJECTION OF THIS POLE LOCATION AND DEPTH,
 IF NO RESPONSE CAN BE OBTAINED FROM UTILITY PROVIDER,
 PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF COMMUNICATION AND A LETTER OF
 NO RESPONSE.
  
 3. APPEARS POWER IS BEING PULLED FROM A TRANSFORMER
 WITHIN CITY/PRIVATE PROPERTY, PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF
 UTILITY/ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE SURVEY OR PROVIDE
 OWNER???S CONSENT. OTHERWISE HAVE TO DRAW POWER FROM
 ALTERNATIVE LOCATION.
  
 4. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN AND COLOR MEETS CITY
 STANDARDS.
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 (561)822-1426 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-01-04 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-01-04 Time 15:50 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-01-04 Time 15:44 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-04 15:50:02FAILED
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO
 THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. SOME OF THE COMMENTS BELOW
 ARE INCLUDED ON THE PLACEMENT PERMIT REVIEW AS WELL AS
 WITH THIS PERMIT.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR IS TO MATCH THE EXISTING DECORATIVE CITY
 LIGHT POLES (SPECKLED CONCRETE) LOCATED ON SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE AND EVERNIA STREET.
  
 3) THE POLE LOCATION IS APPROVED BY THE SPECIAL EVENTS;
 HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CLARITY IS REQUIRED SO
 PLANNING STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS PROPER ADA
 CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE POLE AND THE EDGE OF THE
 SIDEWALK:
  
 A. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RAYCAP POLE DESIGN
 INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED, AND IT SHOWS A 14-INCH
 DIAMETER POLE MOUNTED ON A 16-INCH OUTSIDE DIMENSION
 BASE PLATE. THE BASE PLATE SETS THE WIDTH OF THE ABOVE
 GROUND FACILITY AT GRADE. SHEET C-3 SHOWS THE CAISSON
 EXTENDING 8-INCHES PAST THE EDGE OF THE POLE, WHICH IS
 7-INCHES PAST THE EDGE OF THE BASE PLATE.
  
 B. THE SURVEY MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE DIMENSION FROM THE
 INSIDE EDGE OF THE CURB TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND
 THE DIMENSION FROM THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE CURB FOR THE
 WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK. THE 6-INCH CURB MAY NOT BE
 INCLUDED IN THIS MEASURE, SINCE THE 6-INCH CURB IS NOT
 CONSIDERED A FLUSH SURFACE AND MAY NOT BE USED TO MEET
 THE REQUIRED ADA MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH OF 36-INCHES.
  
 C. BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED ON THE
 SURVEY AND THE POLE SPECIFICATIONS, STAFF WILL VERIFY
 THAT THERE IS ADA SIDEWALK CLEARANCE. NOTE: IF THE
 CAISSON IS INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY,
 THEN THE BASE PLATE EXTENDS 23-INCHES FROM THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND INTO THE SIDEWALK. IN ORDER TO
 HAVE THE 36-INCH CLEARANCE, THE WIDTH FROM THE INSIDE
 EDGE OF THE CURB TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE MUST BE SHOWN
 ON THE SURVEY AS AT LEAST 59-INCHES OR 4.92-FEET.
  
 4) FROM THE INFORMATION PRESENTED, THE 14-INCH DIAMETER
 POLE DOES NOT FIT AT THIS LOCATION.
  
 5) THE COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT PERMIT - CITY
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHOWS THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BEING
 SUPPLIED FROM AN FPL TRANSFORMER THAT IS LOCATED ON
 CITY PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF EVERNIA STREET. THE
 SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW THAT THE AREA WHERE YOU PLAN TO
 PULL POWER FROM ACROSS CITY PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN
 A UTILITY EASEMENT. IF NO EASEMENT IS PRESENT, YOU WILL
 NEED TO GET THE POWER FROM AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION. THE
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PLANS MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 ELECTRIC PERMIT 21010664.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2021-05-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-05-25 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2021-05-25 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-25 14:28:54FAILED
  
 PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT, YOU ARE
 REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ISSUED COMMUNICATION FACILITY
 PLACEMENT PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE PLANS
 INCLUDED WITH THIS ELECTRICAL PERMIT MUST MATCH THE
 PLANS APPROVED WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED PERMIT. THE
 COMMENTS BELOW WHERE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE
 COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT PERMIT - CITY
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND APPLY FOR THE ECLECTIC PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 1) THE COVER SHEET "SCOPE OF WORK" CALLS OUT THAT THERE
 WILL BE AN ENCLOSURE CABINET. THIS POLE IS APPROVED TO
 BE A STEALTH POLE, WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT AN ENCLOSURE
 CABINET MOUNTED TO IT.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR IS TO MATCH THE EXISTING DECORATIVE CITY
 LIGHT POLES (SPECKLED CONCRETE) LOCATED ON SOUTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE AND EVERNIA STREET.
  
 3) THE POLE LOCATION IS APPROVED BY THE SPECIAL EVENTS;
 HOWEVER, THERE IS ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE SURVEY
 AND SITE PLAN AND THE EQUIPMENT PLAN REGARDING THE POLE
 DIAMETER WHICH NEED TO BE CORRECTED SO PLANNING STAFF
 CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS PROPER ADA CLEARANCE BETWEEN
 THE POLE AND THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT:
  
 A. THE STEALTH POLE SHOWN ON SHEET C3, ELEVATION AND
 EQUIPMENT PLAN, HAS A 14-INCH DIAMETER. THE SURVEY
 SHOWS A FOUR (4) INCH DIAMETER POLE. SHEET C2, SITE
 PLAN, DOES NOT CALL OUT THE DIAMETER OF THE POLE, BUT
 SEEMS TO MIRROR THE SURVEY.
  
 B. THE SURVEY AND THE SITE PLAN SHOW A SIDEWALK WIDTH
 OF FOUR (4) FEET PLUS A SIX (6) INCH CURB FOR A TOTAL
 OF 54 INCHES IN WIDTH. A 14-INCH DIAMETER POLE OFFSET 7
 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESULTS IN THE
 OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE POLE BEING 33 INCHES FROM THE
 TRAVEL LANE NOT 43 INCHES AS LISTED ON THE SURVEY. ADA
 REQUIRES A 36-INCH-WIDE FLUSH SURFACE, WHICH YOU DO NOT
 HAVE AT 33 INCHES. NOTE: THE FULL SIX (6) INCH CURB IS
 NOT CONSIDERED A FLUSH SURFACE SINCE THE OUTSIDE
 PORTION OF THE CURB SLOPES INTO A ROUNDED CONDITION
 WHERE IT TRANSITIONS TO THE ROADSIDE FACE OF THE CURB,
 SO YOU HAVE EVEN LESS THAN 33 INCHES AT THIS LOCATION.
  
 4) FROM THE INFORMATION PRESENTED, THE 14-INCH DIAMETER
 POLE DOES NOT FIT AT THIS LOCATION.
  
 NOTE: A RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF
 THE POLE WITHIN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL BE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-02-04 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-02-04 Time 12:01 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2021-02-04 Time 12:01 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-04 12:03:54FAILED
  
 THE PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (CITY
 OWNED) AND NOT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION THAT A) THE CITY PERMITTED VERIZON TO
 INSTALL A POLE ON IT'S PRIVATE PROPERTY AND B) THAT THE
 POLE HAS BEEN ISSUED A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY
 APPROVAL.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved