| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20120237 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
Time |
18:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-25 18:07:28 | VEHICLE BARRIER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
Time |
13:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-11 13:06:26 | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, 7H BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | PROPOSED VEHICLE BARRIER: | | | 1-TYPICALLY, VEHICLE BARRIERS ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY | | | WITH THE GUARDRAIL REQUIREMENTS ALSO. PROPOSED VEHICLE | | | BARRIER DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE GUARDRAIL REQUIREMENTS. | | | THERE IS A NOTE FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ON SHEET | | | BC01 STATING "CHAINLINK FENCE ATTACHED TO BARRIER | | | CABLES BY OTHERS". NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING CHAINLINK FENCE INSTALLATION. | | | SPECIFY FASTENING METHOD AND OPENINGS SIZE TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH GUARDRAIL REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 1015 | | | FBC-BUILDING AND SEC. 1607.8.1 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | NOTE: SENT TO ZONING REVIEW FOR PROPOSED RAILING | | | SYSTEM-APPROVAL WITH CHAIN LINK FENCE. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-28 16:51:47 | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, 6TH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 1- REVIEW CAN NOT BE PERFORMED. UNABLE TO READ | | | INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS. UPLOADED | | | DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS ARE NOT LEGIBLE. PLEASE | | | UPLOAD LEGIBLE DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: | | | WALKER CONSULTANTS REVIEW STAMP INDICATE THAT THERE ARE | | | SOME CORRECTIONS NOTED AND SUBMITTAL IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | I WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE WHAT ARE THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS | | | EITHER. NEED TO SHOW THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | 2-- PLEASE MAKE SURE RESUBMITTED DRAWINGS AND | | | CALCULATIONS ARE REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. | | | SEC. 107.3.4 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 3- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-25 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-25 |
Time |
16:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-25 16:05:09 | GOOD AFTERNOON MATTHEW, | | | | | | FIRST OF ALL I WANT TO APOLOGIZE FOR NOT GETTING BACK | | | TO YOU EARLIER. I WAS DISCUSSING THIS ISSUE WITH ROBERT | | | BROWN AND I WAS DOING SOME RESEARCH TO VERIFY WHICH | | | BUILDING CODE WAS THIS BUILDING BUILT UNDER. THE REASON | | | FOR THIS IS THAT THERE ARE SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE | | | 1979 AND THE 1982 STANDARD BUILDING CODES AND I WANTED | | | TO BE SURE WHICH BUILDING CODE TO APPLY IN THIS | | | DISCUSSION. BOTH BUILDING CODE EDITIONS ADDRESS THE | | | ISSUE WITH THE IMPACT GUARDRAILS BUT THE MAIN | | | DIFFERENCE IS THE DESIGN STANDARDS. THE 1979 CODE | | | REQUIRES IMPACT GUARDRAILS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING AN | | | IMPACT OF NOT LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY (150) | | | POUNDS PER LINEAL FOOT, WHILE THE 1982 CODE REQUIRES | | | IMPACT GUARDRAILS CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING AN IMPACT OF | | | NOT LESS THAN TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (2,500) | | | FOOT-POUNDS. | | | | | | BASED ON MY RESEARCH 777 S. FLAGLER DR. BUILDING WAS | | | BUILT UNDER THE 1982 EDITION. SEE ATTACHED ?CERTIFICATE | | | OF CODE CONFORMANCE BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER | | | AFFIDAVIT?. | | | THEREFORE, THE IMPACT GUARDRAILS NEED TO COMPLY WITH | | | THE 2,500 FOOT-POUND IMPACT. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN AND I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH YOUR | | | INTERPRETATION. SECTION 412.7(D) OF THE 1982 SBC | | | REQUIRES TWO THINGS. PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAILS AND IMPACT | | | GUARDRAILS. FIRST SENTENCE CALLS FOR PEDESTRIAN | | | GUARDRAILS WHEN THE DROP EXCEEDS 3 FEET . AND, THE | | | SECOND SENTENCE CALLS FOR IMPACT GUARDRAILS AT THE | | | PARKING AREAS. NOTE THAT THE IMPACT GUARDRAILS ARE ONLY | | | REQUIRED AT THE PARKING AREAS NO AT THE PEDESTRIAN OR | | | VEHICULAR ACCESS. | | | TO BETTER ILLUSTRATE THIS POINT, PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT | | | THE PHOTO YOU SENT ME EARLIER SHOWING A CAR PARKED | | | BEHIND THE GUARDRAIL. THIS PHOTO CLEARLY SHOWS THE | | | GUARDRAIL THAT NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED AS AN IMPACT | | | GUARDRAIL AT THE PARKING AREA. THEREFORE, ALL THE | | | GUARDRAILS THAT ARE IN FRONT OF THE PARKED CARS NEED TO | | | BE DESIGNED AS IMPACT GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | THANK YOU | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *****NOTE: | | | ALL THE COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW STILL APPLY. | | | | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A | | | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED | | | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED | | | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY | | | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT | | | THIS. | | | | | | 2- SHEET F-1: | | | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN | | | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE | | | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, | | | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE | | | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE | | | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 | | | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH THE MASTER PERMIT WAS | | | ISSUED IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION | | | (2017) NOT FBC 2020. CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- SHEET F-2: | | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM | | | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 | | | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH | | | EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING | | | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A | | | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH | | | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. | | | | | | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE | | | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-15 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-15 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-15 18:02:43 | 01/15/21 DISCUSSED WITH ROBERT BROWN (BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL) THE LETTER EMAILED TO ME ON 01/13/2021 BY | | | MATTHEW L. CONLEY P.E. THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD FROM WALKER CONSULTANTS FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | THE BUILDING WAS BUILT IN 1985. IS OK TO DO THE | | | GUARDRAIL REPAIRS BASED ON THE CODE IN EFFECT AT THAT | | | TIME INSTEAD OF TODAY'S REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | THE CODE IN EFFECT WAS THE SBC 1982 EDITION. | | | | | | BACK THEN THE CODE USED THE TERM GUARDRAIL FOR | | | GUARDRAILS IN PARKING STRUCTURES NO "VEHICLE BARRIER". | | | BASED ON SEC. 1204.2(C) OF SBC 1982 THE "GUARDRAILS OR | | | INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS ACTING AS GUARDRAILS, IN | | | PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ABSORB AN | | | ENERGY OF TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (2,500) FOOT-POUNDS | | | APPLIED AT EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AT ANY | | | POINT HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE SPAN OF THE GUARDRAIL. ALL | | | ELEMENTS OF THE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM, INCLUDING SUPPORTS | | | AND CONNECTIONS, SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ABSORB THIS | | | ENERGY BY THE FORMULA PA/24 = 2500FT-LBS. | | | WHERE : | | | P=THE EQUIVALENT STATIC LOAD IN POUNDS AT THE POINT OF | | | IMPACT. | | | A= DEFLECTION OR MOVEMENT OF THE GUARDRAIL AT THE POINT | | | OF IMPACT IN INCHES. | | | | | | NOTE: CURRENT CODE SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC REQUIRES A DESIGN | | | TO RESIST A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 6,000 POUNDS. | | | | | | | | | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A | | | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED | | | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED | | | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY | | | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT | | | THIS. | | | | | | 2- SHEET F-1: | | | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN | | | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE | | | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, | | | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE | | | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE | | | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 | | | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH MASTER PERMIT WAS APPROVED | | | IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION (2017) NOT | | | FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- SHEET F-2: | | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM | | | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 | | | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH | | | EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING | | | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A | | | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH | | | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. | | | | | | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE | | | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-11 16:37:54 | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | | | | *****NOTE: | | | ALL THE COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW STILL APPLY. | | | REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | ONLY THE ENGINEER GUARDRAIL CALCULATIONS WERE | | | RESUBMITTED. THEY DON'T SEEM TO BE REVISED. SAME | | | CALCULATIONS WERE RESUBMITTED. THE ONLY INFORMATION | | | THAT WAS CHANGED WAS THE "CHECKED BY AND THE DATES. | | | ALSO, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE | | | DATES WERE CHANGED AND NOW THEY SHOW AN EARLIER DATE | | | THAN THE ONE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. | | | ENGINEER PROVIDING THE CALCULATIONS TO CLARIFY. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS | | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A | | | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED | | | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED | | | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY | | | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT | | | THIS. | | | | | | 2- SHEET F-1: | | | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN | | | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE | | | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, | | | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE | | | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE | | | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 | | | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH THE MASTER PERMIT WAS | | | ISSUED IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION | | | (2017) NOT FBC 2020. CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- SHEET F-2: | | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM | | | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 | | | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH | | | EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING | | | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A | | | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH | | | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. | | | | | | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE | | | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
Time |
17:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
Time |
17:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-07 17:59:36 | ****NOTE: | | | THERE IS NO NEW INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. SAME | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW APPLY. SEE BELOW: | | | | | | | | | | | | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A | | | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED | | | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED | | | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY | | | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT | | | THIS. | | | | | | 2- SHEET F-1: | | | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN | | | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE | | | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, | | | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE | | | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE | | | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 | | | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH MASTER PERMIT WAS APPROVED | | | IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION (2017) NOT | | | FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3- SHEET F-2: | | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM | | | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 | | | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH | | | EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING | | | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A | | | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH | | | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. | | | | | | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE | | | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-18 13:49:55 | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A | | | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED | | | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED | | | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY | | | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. | | | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT | | | THIS. | | | | | | 2- SHEET F-1: | | | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN | | | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE | | | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, | | | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE | | | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE | | | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 | | | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH | | | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. | | | | | | 3- SHEET F-2: | | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM | | | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 | | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 | | | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH | | | EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING | | | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A | | | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH MASTER PERMIT WAS APPROVED | | | IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION (2017) NOT | | | FBC 2020. | | | CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE | | | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
Time |
18:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-24 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2021-06-18 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-08 |
Time |
17:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-18 |
Time |
06:41 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-01-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-15 |
Time |
18:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-15 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-08 |
Time |
15:04 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
Time |
18:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-04 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-04 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
Time |
18:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-25 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-06-11 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-11 11:09:43 | VEHICLE BARRIER DRAWINGS & CALCULATIONS WITH ENGINEER'S | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE FILED IN THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-05-28 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-28 16:33:37 | SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY | | | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | BUILDING DIVISION | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
17:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-11 17:21:49 | DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEAL/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2021-01-07 |
Time |
17:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-07 18:00:15 | DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-12-18 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-18 14:08:34 | DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | | | | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED | | | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN | | | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A | | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. | | | | | | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE | | | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. | | | | | | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS | | | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY | | | HALL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2021-06-17 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|