| 2020-07-13 14:49:41 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS AN INDICATON ON THE RESPONSE SHEET # 5 |
| | REGARDING DOCUMENTS FROM THE EOR. |
| | |
| | THE APPROVAL OF THIS REVISION WILL BE PENDING THE |
| | DOCUMENTS AND THE REVISED DRAWINGS OF THE MASTER PLAN |
| | SHEETS SPECIFICALY TO THE REQUIRED SEPARATION AND |
| | PENETRATION POINTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS AN INDICATON ON THE RESPONSE SHEET # 4 |
| | REGARDING THE PIPING REMOVAL. |
| | |
| | THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL OF PERMIT #19120231 HAD HYDRAULIC |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR REMOTE AREA # 4. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF THIS PIPING AND ANY RELATED |
| | RECORD SHALL ALOS REQUIRE A REVISION OF THE PREVIOUSLY |
| | APPROVED HYDRALIC CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN OFFICIAL RETRACTION OF THOSE |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CORRIDOR SPRINKLERS, IT |
| | PPEARS THAT THE POTENTIAL FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| | REMOTE AREAS # 1 THRU 3 MAY BE AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROIVDE A REVIEW OF THOSE AREAS AND CORRECT OR |
| | PROVIDE A DETAILED NARRATIVE THAT THOSE AREAS ARE NOT |
| | AFFECTED NOR CHANGED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
