| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20061478 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-30 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-30 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-30 13:41:20 | NOT SUITE 200, IF TAKING OVER OLD LUCKY BRAND JEANS | | | STORE THEN THE SUITE WOULD BE 126. PLEASE EMAIL | | | [email protected] TO CONFIRM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-28 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-28 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
Time |
07:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
Time |
07:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-07-21 |
Time |
18:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-07-21 |
Time |
18:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-21 18:18:34 | NO ELEC WORK REVIEWED OR APPPROVED |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-12-12 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-11-20 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-10-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-10-07 |
Time |
06:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-09-14 |
Time |
12:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-08-12 |
Time |
11:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-07-23 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-06-30 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-12-02 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-26 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-09-09 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
Time |
07:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-08-31 |
Time |
07:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
Time |
15:28 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-06 15:29:14 | FAILED | | | | | | WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN - YETI SIGN "B" | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL | | | STAMP IS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS. STAFF CONTINUES TO BE | | | UNABLE TO LOCATE STAMPED PLANS OR A LETTER FROM | | | CITYPLACE RETAIL APPROVING THE PLANS IN THE RESUBMITTAL | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | | CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN | | | A MARGIN AT LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE | | | PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | PERMIT SHOW THAT THERE IS A MARGIN OF ONLY 1.125 | | | INCHES, NOT THE REQUIRED THREE (3) INCHES. THE ROSEMARY | | | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT PROVIDE FOR A WAIVER | | | OF THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | PERMITTED: 4 SF | | | PROPOSED: 4 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-09-11 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-09-11 |
Time |
13:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-11 14:59:59 | FAILED | | | | | | WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS REQUIRED | | | ON THE PLANS. WHILE THE RESPONSE COMMENT STATES THAT | | | THIS IS PROVIDED, STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATED STAMPED | | | PLANS OR A LETTER FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL APPROVING THE | | | PLANS IN THE RESUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA APPROVED ON | | | SEPTEMBER 8, 2020, REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA | | | SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN AT LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM | | | ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. THE PLANS | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE | | | SIGN AND THE DIMENSION OF THE COPY AREA. WHILE THE | | | DIMENSION FROM THE EDGE OF THE COPY AREA IS NOT | | | PROVIDED, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COPY AREA AND THE | | | SIGN WIDTH IS ONLY 2.25 INCHES, WHICH IS LESS THAN THE | | | TOTAL OF SIX (6) INCHES THAT THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT | | | SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE. ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020, JORDAN | | | RATHLEV, FROM RELATED, SENT STAFF A BLADE SIGN PLAN | | | WHICH INCLUDED THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE COPY AREA TO THE | | | EDGE OF THE SIGN AND IT VERIFIES THAT THERE IS ONLY | | | 1.125 INCHES, NOT THE REQUIRED THREE (3) INCHES. THE | | | ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT PROVIDE FOR | | | A WAIVER OF THIS REQUIREMENT. THE RESUBMITTED PLANS | | | SHALL SHOW THE DIMENSION LINES FROM THE COPY TO THE | | | EDGE OF THE SIGN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE | | | TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. | | | | | | PERMITTED: 4 SF | | | PROPOSED: 4 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-22 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-22 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-22 16:45:22 | FAILED | | | | | | WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS REQUIRED | | | ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 2) THE CURRENT ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA | | | REQUIRE BLADE SIGNS TO BE SUSPENDED ON A METAL BRACKET, | | | NOT FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL, SO THE PROPOSED BLADE | | | SIGN DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. CITYPLACE RETAIL | | | CURRENTLY HAS AN AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEMARY SQUARE | | | TENANT SIGN CRITERIA UNDER REVIEW BY THE CITY. IF | | | APPROVED (TENTATIVELY IN SEPTEMBER), BLADE SIGNS WOULD | | | BE PERMITTED TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL; HOWEVER, | | | ZONING CANNOT APPROVE A FLUSH MOUNTED DESIGN UNTIL THE | | | SIGN CRITERIA ARE AMENDED. | | | | | | 3) SHEET 4 OF 4 STATES THAT THERE WILL BE TWO BLADE | | | SIGNS MANUFACTURED AND INSTALLED. ONLY ONE BLADE SIGN | | | IS PERMITTED. | | | | | | 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | | THAT THE LETTERS ON A NON-ILLUMINATED BLADE SIGN TO BE | | | PAINTED ON. THE PROPOSED SIGN SHOWS APPLIED ACRYLIC | | | LETTERS. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA | | | PERMIT CITYPLACE RETAIL TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO USE | | | ALTERNATE MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER | | | SIGN PLAN. A WAIVER I MUST BE GRANTED IN WRITING BY | | | CITYPLACE RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 5) THE CURRENT ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA | | | REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN | | | AT LEAST SIX (6) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED | | | SIGN AREA. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE SIGN FACE THAT | | | VERIFIES THIS REQUIREMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT USING THE | | | DIMENSIONS PROVIDED; IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE SIX | | | (6) INCH MINIMUM IS MET. CITYPLACE RETAIL CURRENTLY HAS | | | AN AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | | CRITERIA UNDER REVIEW BY THE CITY. IF APPROVED | | | (TENTATIVELY IN SEPTEMBER), THE MARGIN WILL BE REDUCED | | | TO THREE (3) INCHES MINIMUM; HOWEVER, ZONING CANNOT | | | APPROVE THREE (3) INCHES UNTIL THE AMENDMENT HAS | | | PASSED. THE PROPOSED DESIGN DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE | | | THREE (3) INCH MINIMUM EITHER. | | | | | | PERMITTED: 4 SF | | | PROPOSED: 4 SF | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|