Plan Review Details - Permit 20061469
Plan Review Stops For Permit 20061469
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2020-09-09 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2020-09-09 Time 12:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2020-09-09 Time 12:20 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-09 12:20:51SUITE 126
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-06-30 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2020-06-30 Time 13:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2020-06-30 Time 13:34 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-30 13:37:25NOT SUITE 200, IF TAKING OVER OLD LUCKY BRAND JEANS
 STORE THEN THE SUITE WOULD BE 126. PLEASE EMAIL
 [email protected] TO CONFIRM
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2020-12-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-12-14 Time 11:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-12-14 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2020-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-11-30 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-11-30 Time 08:13 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-30 08:18:49SFR REMODEL
 REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON
 561-805-6716
 [email protected].
 CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2017 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1
 AMENDMENTS
  
 CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107
 1) THE SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWING FROM THE ENGINEER HAS
 BEEN LOCKED (REMOVED) FROM BEING APPROVED BECAUSE THE
 DRAWING WAS REVISED - THE REVISED DRAWING NEEDS TO BE
 SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2020-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-09-16 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-09-16 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-09-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2020-09-09 Time 08:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2020-09-09 Time 08:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-08-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-08-26 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-08-26 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-26 14:43:51SIGN
 REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON
 561-805-6716
 [email protected].
 CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2017 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1
 AMENDMENTS
  
 CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SIGN ATTACHMENT
 DETAILS FROM AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH
 THE WIND LOADS PER FBC 1609
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-07-17 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-07-17 Time 08:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2020-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2020-12-12 Time 09:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2020-11-20 Time 15:25 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-10-07 Time 06:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-09-15 Time 11:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2020-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By ccarvaja Date 2020-09-14 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccarvaja Date 2020-08-12 Time 11:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2020-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-07-17 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-06-30 Time 13:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2020-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-12-15 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-12-15 Time 10:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2020-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-11-30 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-11-30 Time 08:13 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-30 08:16:11SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR
 ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW.
 DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW IN "ADOBE READER" AS
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. - OR - IF YOUR
 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR
 DIGITAL SIGNATURE - PLEASE DROP OFF (CITY HALL DROP
 BOX) THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS
 ALONG WITH A "PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM" EXPLAINING THE
 REASON FOR SUBMITTING THE DOCUMENT OR DRAWINGS. PLAN
 REVIEW REQUEST FORM CAN BE OBTAINED BY E MAILING
 [email protected] AND ASKING FOR THE FORM.
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2020-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-09-16 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-09-16 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-09-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2020-09-09 Time 08:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2020-09-09 Time 08:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-08-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-08-26 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-08-26 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-26 14:45:10SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR
 ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW.
 DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW IN "ADOBE READER" AS
 DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. - OR - IF YOUR
 ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE - PLEASE DROP OFF (CITY HALL DROP BOX) THE
 ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS ALONG
 WITH A "PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM" EXPLAINING THE REASON
 FOR SUBMITTING THE DOCUMENT OR DRAWINGS. PLAN REVIEW
 REQUEST FORM CAN BE OBTAINED BY E MAILING [email protected]
 AND ASKING FOR THE FORM.
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2020-07-17 Time 08:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2020-07-17 Time 08:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2020-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-12-11 Time 14:49 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-12-11 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-10-06 Time 15:44 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-10-06 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-06 15:45:16FAILED
  
 WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN - YETI SIGN "C"
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL
 STAMP IS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS. STAFF CONTINUES TO BE
 UNABLE TO LOCATE STAMPED PLANS OR A LETTER FROM
 CITYPLACE RETAIL APPROVING THE PLANS IN THE RESUBMITTAL
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN
 A MARGIN AT LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE
 PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE
 PERMIT SHOW THAT THERE IS A MARGIN OF ONLY 1.125
 INCHES, NOT THE REQUIRED THREE (3) INCHES. THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT PROVIDE FOR A WAIVER
 OF THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 PERMITTED: 4 SF
 PROPOSED: 4 SF
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-09-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-09-11 Time 15:27 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-09-11 Time 15:27 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-11 15:28:23FAILED
  
 WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS REQUIRED
 ON THE PLANS. WHILE THE RESPONSE COMMENT STATES THAT
 THIS IS PROVIDED, STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATED STAMPED
 PLANS OR A LETTER FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL APPROVING THE
 PLANS IN THE RESUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS.
  
 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA APPROVED ON
 SEPTEMBER 8, 2020, REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA
 SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN AT LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM
 ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. THE PLANS
 SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 SIGN AND THE DIMENSION OF THE COPY AREA. WHILE THE
 DIMENSION FROM THE EDGE OF THE COPY AREA IS NOT
 PROVIDED, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COPY AREA AND THE
 SIGN WIDTH IS ONLY 2.25 INCHES, WHICH IS LESS THAN THE
 TOTAL OF SIX (6) INCHES THAT THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE. ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020, JORDAN
 RATHLEV SENT STAFF A BLADE SIGN PLAN WHICH INCLUDED THE
 DIMENSIONS FROM THE COPY AREA TO THE EDGE OF THE SIGN
 AND IT VERIFIES THAT THERE IS ONLY 1.125 INCHES, NOT
 THE REQUIRED THREE (3) INCHES. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT PROVIDE FOR A WAIVER OF
 THIS REQUIREMENT. THE RESUBMITTED PLANS SHALL SHOW THE
 DIMENSION LINES FROM THE COPY TO THE EDGE OF THE SIGN
 IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA.
  
 PERMITTED: 4 SF
 PROPOSED: 4 SF
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By eshcneid Date 2020-07-15 Time 17:03 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2020-07-15 Time 16:13 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-15 17:05:09FAILED
  
 WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL STAMP IS REQUIRED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 2) THE CURRENT ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA
 REQUIRE BLADE SIGNS TO BE SUSPENDED ON A METAL BRACKET,
 NOT FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL, SO THE PROPOSED BLADE
 SIGN DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. CITYPLACE RETAIL
 CURRENTLY HAS AN AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA UNDER REVIEW BY THE CITY. IF
 APPROVED (TENTATIVELY IN SEPTEMBER), BLADE SIGNS WOULD
 BE PERMITTED TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL; HOWEVER,
 ZONING CANNOT APPROVE THREE (3) INCHES UNTIL THE
 AMENDMENT HAS PASSED.
  
 3) SHEET 4 OF 4 STATES THAT THERE WILL BE TWO BLADE
 SIGNS MANUFACTURED AND INSTALLED. ONLY ONE BLADE SIGN
 IS PERMITTED.
  
 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE LETTERS ON A NON-ILLUMINATED BLADE SIGN TO BE
 PAINTED ON. THE PROPOSED SIGN SHOWS APPLIED ACRYLIC
 LETTERS. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA
 PERMIT CITYPLACE RETAIL TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO USE
 ALTERNATE MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER
 SIGN PLAN. A WAIVER I MUST BE GRANTED IN WRITING BY
 CITYPLACE RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN AT
 LEAST SIX (6) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED
 SIGN AREA. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE SIGN FACE THAT
 VERIFIES THIS REQUIREMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT USING THE
 DIMENSIONS PROVIDED; IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE SIX
 (6) INCH MINIMUM IS MET. CITYPLACE RETAIL CURRENTLY HAS
 AN AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA UNDER REVIEW BY THE CITY. IF APPROVED
 (TENTATIVELY IN SEPTEMBER), THE MARGIN WILL BE REDUCED
 TO THREE (3) INCHES MINIMUM; HOWEVER, ZONING CANNOT
 APPROVE THREE (3) INCHES UNTIL THE AMENDMENT HAS
 PASSED.
  
 PERMITTED: 4SF
 PROPOSED: 4 SF
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved