Plan Review Details - Permit 20031379
Plan Review Stops For Permit 20031379
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 9 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2023-05-29 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2023-05-29 Time 19:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2023-05-29 Time 19:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2023-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2023-05-09 Time 14:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2023-05-09 Time 14:25 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2023-03-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2023-03-28 Time 06:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2023-03-21 Time 08:06 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-09-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2022-09-06 Time 11:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2022-04-06 Time 11:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-07-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-07-22 Time 10:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-07-22 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2020-06-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-06-14 Time 07:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-06-14 Time 07:17 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-14 07:38:47BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED BUT NO STAMP ON THE PLANS
 UNTIL THE SIGNATURES ON PLANS CAN BE APPROVED.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-04-06 Time 07:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-04-06 Time 07:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 9 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2023-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2023-05-30 Time 15:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2023-05-30 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2023-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2023-05-11 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2023-05-11 Time 14:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2023-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2023-03-22 Time 14:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2023-03-22 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-09-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2022-09-22 Time 02:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2022-09-22 Time 02:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-04-25 Time 14:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-04-25 Time 14:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-08-06 Time 07:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-08-03 Time 16:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-06-24 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-06-24 Time 12:25 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-24 12:36:28CODES IN EFFECT:
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION
 FBC CE = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014
 5TH EDITION
 FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2014 5TH EDITION,
 PART VIII ELECTRICAL
 NEC = NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
 FS = FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 6TH ED
 NFPA 70 2014 EDITION
  
 JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
 VALUE OF SIGNS NEVER ADDRESSED (2200) TOTAL VALUE OF
 SIGNS AND INSTALLTION
  
 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS. IF, IN THE OPINION OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF
 BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS,
 MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE
 UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE
 DENIED, UNLESS THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW DETAILED,
 QUANTITY ESTIMATES, AND/OR BONA FIDE SIGNED CONTRACTS
 (EXCLUDING LAND VALUE) TO MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION
 OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT
 VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, PLUMBING,
 MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE WORK,
 ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS,
 OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE.
 VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED
 DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES
 (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY
 INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT
 VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-04-08 Time 11:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-04-08 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-08 11:21:30ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 6TH ED
 NFPA 70 2014 EDITION
  
 JAKE LEAHY BN, BU, PX
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
 1) VALUE FOR SIGNS TO INCLUDE SIGNS AND LABOR.
  
 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS. IF, IN THE OPINION OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF
 BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS,
 MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE
 UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE
 DENIED, UNLESS THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW DETAILED,
 QUANTITY ESTIMATES, AND/OR BONA FIDE SIGNED CONTRACTS
 (EXCLUDING LAND VALUE) TO MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION
 OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT
 VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, PLUMBING,
 MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE WORK,
 ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS,
 OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE.
 VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED
 DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES
 (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY
 INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT
 VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 2) PLANS NOT SIGNED
  
 PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL OR THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR QUALIFIER. FS
 471.003(2)(H); 471.025; FBC 107.2.1
2020-04-07 07:57:12JAKE LEAHY REVIEWING.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 9 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By amcgrego Date 2023-07-27 Time 14:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status N Date 2023-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2023-05-30 Time 15:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2023-05-01 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2023-04-12 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-04-12 Time 10:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2023-03-20 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2022-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-10-14 Time 12:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-08-30 Time 16:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-08-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-08-15 Time 11:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2022-07-12 Time 07:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-05-03 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-04-04 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-08-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2020-08-20 Time 17:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2020-07-15 Time 09:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2020-06-25 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-06-25 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-06-11 Time 09:35 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2020-04-24 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-04-24 Time 16:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-03-30 Time 09:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 9 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2023-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2023-05-11 Time 14:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2023-05-11 Time 14:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2023-03-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2023-03-28 Time 06:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2023-03-28 Time 06:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2022-09-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2022-09-06 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-08-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcphers Date 2022-08-15 Time 11:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcphers Date 2022-08-15 Time 11:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2022-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-05-03 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-05-03 Time 14:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-08-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-08-04 Time 13:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-06-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-06-14 Time 07:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-06-14 Time 07:29 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-14 07:36:421) SHEETS DRAWN BY CONTRACTOR: CERTIFICATION BY
 CONTRACTOR.
 107.3.4.3 CERTIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR. PLEASE NOTE THE
 EXCEPTION TO ENGINEERED PLANS UNDER 471.003(H)
 ELECTRICAL/ PLUMBING/ MECHANICAL, 481.229(1)(C)
 (BUILDING) REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR FOR THAT TRADE THAT
 WILL BE LICENSED IN THAT TRADE, WILL ALSO BE THE
 CONTRACTOR THAT DESIGNS THE SYSTEM UNDER THAT TRADE.
 THE CONTRACTOR (QUALIFIER) THAT CREATED / DRAWN THE SET
 OF PLANS WILL NEED TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AS THE AUTHOR
 OF THE PLANS. PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, SIGN YOUR NAME
 AND LICENSE NUMBER FOR THE TRADE YOU ARE LICENSED IN
 AND PLANS DRAWN. FOR EACH TRADE THE CONTRACTOR
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN UNDER THE TRADE LICENSED IN
 MUST PRINT THEIR NAME, SIGN THEIR NAME AND LICENSE
 NUMBER, NOTE THESE PLANS APPEAR TO BE DRAWN BY ONE
 INDUVIAL, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE LICENSED AS A BUILDING,
 ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ALL THESE
 TRADES UNDER ONE SHEET.
  
 2) THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL ON THE ENGINEERING SHEET
 (WIND DESIGN) BY TONY JACOBS P. E. # 85008IT APPEARS TO
 BE A PAPER PLAN UPLOADED TO BE A DIGITAL PLAN.
 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES FOR SIGNING AND SEALING
 ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS (DIGITAL SIGNATURES),
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.005 (3)(C) A
 SCANNED, FACSIMILE, DIGITALLY CREATED OR COPIED IMAGE
 OF THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE SHALL NOT BE USED ON
 DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED ENGIN20040980EERING PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 3) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW
 COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE
 THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE NOTE WE ARE WORKING FROM HOME BECAUSE OF COVID
 19 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTACT ME, MY CELL NUMBER IS
 561-718-9724.
 JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 BUILDING DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402
 TEL: 561-805-6717
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-04-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-04-08 Time 12:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-04-08 Time 12:49 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-08 12:49:50PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL OR THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR QUALIFIER. FS
 471.003(2)(H); 471.025; FBC 107.2.1
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 9 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2023-05-26 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2023-05-26 Time 16:09 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2023-05-26 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2023-05-26 16:10:51FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGNS TO GO PLANS DO NOT
 VERIFY THAT THE CONDUIT, CROSSOVERS, WIRING, ETC.,
 NECESSARY FOR THE SIGN'S ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE
 CONCEALED AND NOT VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. ****
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SENT TO CONTRACTOR VIA EMAIL.
 ****
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGNS TO GO PLANS SO NOT
 VERIFY THAT THE SIGN IS CENTERED WITHIN THE ARCADE
 ARCHWAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY THIS
 REQUIREMENT. **** NO DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS
 FOR STAFF TO VERIFY THE STATEMENT IN THE RESPONSE
 LETTER. ****
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 THE BLADE SIGN COMPLIES WITH ZONING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 7 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2023-04-11 Time   Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2023-04-11 Time 17:14 Sent To  
Notes
2023-04-11 18:03:46FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) THE PLANS UPLOADED ON MARCH 20, 2023 ARE ON A
 DIFFERENT TITLE BLOCK THAN THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED
 PLANS (DESIGNS TO GO VS SIGNAGE SOLUTIONS) AND SHOW
 INCONSISTENT INFORMATION.
  
 A. THE NEWLY SUBMITTED DESIGN TO GO DRAWING SHOWS THE
 LETTER "P" EXCEEDING THE ROSEMARY SQUARE SIGN CRITERIA
 PERMITTED 18-INCH LETTER HEIGHT BASED ON THE DIMENSION
 LINES PROVIDED. NOTE: ALL OF THE LETTERS ARE SHOWN AS
 TALLER; HOWEVER ONLY THE "P" DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE
 SIGN CRITERIA.
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE ENGINEER SIGNED DRAWINGS
 INCLUDED AS SHEET 1 OF 1 (UPLOAD DATE 7/12/22) AND THE
 STOREFRONT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5 (UPLOAD DATE
 4/4/22) WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE NEW CODE
 COMPLIANT SIGN PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT,
 CODE COMPLIANT CONDITIONS.
 C. THE NEW DESIGNS TO GO PLANS DO NOT VERIFY THAT THE
 CONDUIT, CROSSOVERS, WIRING, ETC., NECESSARY FOR THE
 SIGN'S ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE CONCEALED AND NOT
 VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA.
 D. THE NEW DESIGNS TO GO PLANS SO NOT VERIFY THAT THE
 SIGN IS CENTERED WITHIN THE ARCADE ARCHWAY IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY THIS
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 THE NEW DESIGNS TO GO SIGN COMPLIES WITH SIZE
 REQUIREMENTS; HOWEVER, THE BLADE SIGN DRAWING DOES NOT
 PROVIDE HOW THE SIGN'S ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE
 CONCEALED AND NOT VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC OR PROVIDE HOW
 THE MOUNTING PLATE IS SECURED TO THE WALL OR THAT THAT
 THE MOUNTING HARDWARE (BOLTS OR SCREWS) ARE RIVETS,
 SCREWS AND OTHER FASTENERS THAT EXTEND TO VISIBLE
 SURFACES SHALL BE FLUSH, FILLED AND FINISHED SO AS TO
 BE UNNOTICEABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2022-10-14 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-10-14 Time 10:04 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-10-14 Time 08:46 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-14 10:05:09FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 THE REVISED SIGN AS SHOWN ON PAGE 4 OF 5 (UPLOAD DATE
 8/30/22) COMPLIES WITH CODE; HOWEVER, THE ENGINEER
 SIGNED DRAWINGS INCLUDED AS SHEET 1 OF 1 (UPLOAD DATE
 7/12/22) AND THE STOREFRONT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PAGE 3
 OF 5 (UPLOAD DATE 4/4/22) WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT
 THE NEW CODE COMPLIANT SIGN PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW
 CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT CONDITIONS.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 THE SIGN COMPLIES WITH CODE. SEE PROVISO FOR MOUNTING
 BOLTS.
  
 PROVISO: THE BOLT HEADS THAT EXTEND PAST THE MOUNTING
 PLATE, MUST BE CONCEALED BY CAPS MATCHING THE COLOR OF
 THE MOUNTING PLATE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2022-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-11 Time 08:58 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-11 Time 08:43 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-11 08:59:04FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA PERMIT A MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES
 FOR AN ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN. WHILE THIS IS VERIFIED FOR
 THE "C", YOU NEED TO PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE "P".
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE LETTERS ARE TO BE FABRICATED
 OUT OF ALUMINUM WITH A MINIMUM METAL THICKNESS OF .060
 INCHES WITH A PAINTED FINISH. THE SIGN DETAIL SHOWS
 THAT THE LETTER BACKS ARE 0.125 INCHES THICK DIBOLD.
 THIS DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE ALUMINUM COMPONENT IS
 .060 INCHES THICK, NOR IS THE DIBOLD MATERIAL
 PERMITTED. THIS USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS ON THE
 SIGN REQUIRES A WAIVER I WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM
 CITYPLACE RETAIL TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT. NO
 INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO SHOW THAT THE RETURNS MEET
 THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE ALL CONDUIT, RACEWAYS, WIRING, BALLAST
 BOXES, TRANSFORMERS, JUNCTION BOXES, BELL BOXES, POWER
 SUPPLY AND OTHER EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SIGN
 CONNECTION SHALL BE CONCEALED AND NOT VISIBLE TO THE
 PUBLIC. THE PERMIT DRAWINGS SHOW THE 3/4 INCH DIAMETER
 EMT CONDUIT NOT MEETING THIS REQUIREMENT SINCE EXPOSED
 CONDUIT IS ATTACHED TO THE INSIDE OF THE ARCADE.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT COPY AREA BE AT LEAST 3 INCHES
 FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM THE COPY TO THE EDGE OF THE SIGN SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLAN VIEW SHOW TWO DIFFERENT
 DIMENSIONS FOR THE SIGN ELEMENTS - 24 INCHES AND 23.5
 INCHES. ALL DRAWINGS MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE
 DIMENSIONS. (DOUBLE FACE ILLUMINATED BLADE SIGN DETAIL
 VS. MANUFACTURING DETAILS ON PAGE 5 OF 5)
  
 NOTE: YOU WERE ASSESSED A 4 TIMES THE FEE PENALTY FOR
 INSTALLING THE SIGNS WITHOUT A PERMIT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-05-02 Time 11:57 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-04-29 Time 11:37 Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-02 11:57:41FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT A
 MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES FOR A ARCADE
 IDENTITY SIGN. WHILE THIS IS VERIFIED FOR THE "C", YOU
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE "P".
  
 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT RIVETS, SCREWS AND OTHER FASTENERS THAT EXTEND TO
 VISIBLE SURFACES SHALL BE FLUSH, FILLED AND FINISHED SO
 AS TO BE UNNOTICEABLE. THE BOLT HEADS THAT EXTEND PAST
 THE MOUNTING PLATE DO NOT MEET THIS STANDARD. IF THE
 BOLT HEADS MUST EXTEND PAST THE MOUNTING PLATE, THEY
 NEED TO BE CONCEALED BY CAPS MATCHING THE COLOR OF THE
 MOUNTING PLATE.
  
 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA ONLY PERMIT
 WHITE ACRYLIC FOR PUSH THROUGH APPLICATIONS AND DO NOT
 SPECIFICALLY PERMIT IT AS A SIGN FACE; THEREFORE, THIS
 USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS ON THE SIGN REQUIRES A
 WAIVER I WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT.
  
 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE LETTERS ARE TO BE FABRICATED OUT OF ALUMINUM
 WITH A MINIMUM METAL THICKNESS OF .060 INCHES WITH A
 PAINTED FINISH. THE SIGN DETAIL SHOWS THAT THE LETTER
 BACKS ARE 0.125 INCHES THICK DIBOLD. THIS DOES NOT
 VERIFY THAT THE ALUMINUM COMPONENT IS .060 INCHES
 THICK, NOR IS THE DIBOLD MATERIAL PERMITTED. THIS USE
 OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS ON THE SIGN REQUIRES A WAIVER
 I WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT. NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED
 TO SHOW THAT THE RETURNS MEET THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA.
  
 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE ALL
 CONDUIT, RACEWAYS, WIRING, BALLAST BOXES, TRANSFORMERS,
 JUNCTION BOXES, BELL BOXES, POWER SUPPLY AND OTHER
 EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SIGN CONNECTION SHALL BE
 CONCEALED AND NOT VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. THE PERMIT
 DRAWINGS SHOW THE 3/4 INCH DIAMETER EMT CONDUIT NOT
 MEETING THIS REQUIREMENT SINCE EXPOSED CONDUIT IS
 ATTACHED TO THE INSIDE OF THE ARCADE.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 6) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT COPY AREA BE AT LEAST 3 INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF
 THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM THE
 COPY TO THE EDGE OF THE SIGN SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
 COMPLIANCE.
  
 7) THE PLAN VIEW SHOW TWO DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 SIGN ELEMENTS - 24 INCHES AND 23.5 INCHES. ALL DRAWINGS
 MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE DIMENSIONS.
  
 8) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT
 PERMIT THE APPLIED VINYL ON THE FACE OF THE SIGN UNLESS
 THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS ON THE SIGN IS
 APPROVED AS A WAIVER I WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE
 RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT.
  
 NOTE: YOU WERE ASSESSED A 4 TIMES THE FEE PENALTY FOR
 INSTALLING THE SIGNS WITHOUT A PERMIT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-08-18 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-08-18 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-18 16:10:17FAILED - NO CHANGES WERE MADE TO ADDRESS THE ZONING
 COMMENTS.
  
 NEW COMMENT: YOU WERE ASSESSED A 4 TIMES THE FEE
 PENALTY FOR INSTALLING THE SIGN WITHOUT A PERMIT.
  
 REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO
 COMMENTS.
  
 REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DRAWINGS WHICH ARE MORE
 LEGIBLE.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT
 THE SIGN LOOKS LIKE FROM THE DRAWINGS THAT ARE
 PROVIDED, SINCE TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS ARE SHOWN.
  
 A. THE STOREFRONT ELEVATION 002 DRAWING APPEARS TO HAVE
 THE TENANT NAME MOUNTED TO A PANEL THAT IS SOMEHOW
 SUSPENDED FROM THE TOP OF THE ARCADE. THE METHOD OF
 ATTACHMENT TO THE TOP OF THE ARCADE IS UNCLEAR, SO
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF IT COMPLIES WITH THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. ADDITIONALLY,
 SINCE NO PLANS DEPICTING THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
 WERE PROVIDED, STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS
 ARE MET.
  
 B. THE SIGNED ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CHANNEL LETTERS
 MOUNTED TO AN ALUMINUM TUBE. THIS DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN OPTION 2A SUSPENDED LETTERS ON A
 RACEWAY THAT IS DEPICTED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA. (NOTE: THE CITY IS PROCESSING AN
 AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT IS POSSIBLE THAT
 THIS SIGN STYLE WOULD BE PERMITTED. ZONING WILL NOT
 REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE CHANGE IS APPROVED
 AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN THAT IS BEING
 PROPOSED.)
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: ONCE ONE DESIGN IS SUBMITTED, ZONING
 COMMENTS WILL BE ISSUED FOR THAT SIGN. AS PROVIDED,
 EACH DESIGN HAS NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. EACH DESIGN HAS MULTIPLE
 ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ADDRESS OR DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. PLEASE REVIEW THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA BEFORE YOU
 RESUBMIT TO VERIFY THAT THE SIGN DESIGN YOU CHOOSE
 MEETS THE CRITERIA AND PROVIDES THE INFORMATION NEEDED
 TO REVIEW THE PERMIT.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE BLADE SIGNS TO BE SUSPENDED ON A METAL
 BRACKET, NOT FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL. (NOTE: THE CITY
 IS PROCESSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT
 IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS SIGN STYLE WOULD BE PERMITTED.
 ZONING WILL NOT REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE
 CHANGE IS APPROVED AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN
 THAT IS BEING PROPOSED.)
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: BLADE SIGNS ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO
 HAVE THE TRADE NAME AND/OR LOGO MARK ONLY. THE "SLEEP
 STORE" TEXT IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL
 PROVIDES WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A WAIVER I. THE WRITTEN
 APPROVAL MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA STATES THAT WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN PANELS
 SHALL BE DOUBLE SIDED WITH A MAXIMUM SIGN FACE OF FOUR
 (4) SQUARE FEET PER SIDE. THE PROPOSED SIGN FACE
 EXCEEDS THIS AT 29.825 INCHES ON A SIDE. NOTE: THE
 PLANS SHOW TWO DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS FOR THE SIGN
 ELEMENTS. ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE THE SAME.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE LETTERS ON A BLADE SIGN BE
 PUSH-THROUGH WHITE ACRYLIC LETTERS.
  
 A. THE MATERIALS KEY INCLUDES M-2: 1/2 INCH WHITE
 ACRYLIC PUSH THRU, HOWEVER THIS KEY NOTE IS NOT
 INCLUDED WITH THE SIGN ITSELF. IT DOES SHOW M-3 AND
 M-4, WHICH ARE WHITE ACRYLIC, BUT DO NOT SPECIFY THAT
 THESE LETTERS ARE PUSH-THROUGH. THE M-3 NOTATION ON THE
 PLAN STATES THAT THE TEXT IS ROUTED & BACKED COPY,
 WHICH IS NOT PUSH-THROUGH.
  
 B. NOTE V1 ORACLE 052 AZURE BLUE IS SHOWN POINTING TO
 THE LETTER "R". THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA ONLY PERMIT WHITE LETTERS.
  
 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT
 CITYPLACE RETAIL TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO USE ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.
 A WAIVER I MUST BE GRANTED IN WRITING BY CITYPLACE
 RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT COPY AREA BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES
 FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION ON THE PLAN. (NOTE: THE CITY IS PROCESSING
 AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT IS POSSIBLE
 THAT THIS COPY LAYOUT WOULD BE PERMITTED. ZONING WILL
 NOT REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE CHANGE IS
 APPROVED AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN THAT IS
 BEING PROPOSED.)
  
 BANNER
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT: TEMPORARY BANNERS ARE NOT PERMITTED
 TO BE MOUNTED TO THE WALL. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE YOU ARE
 PROPOSING AN ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN, YOU ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO HAVE A FASCIA SIGN. NOTE: THE MOST RECENT
 MANAGEMENT APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED
 TEMPORARY BANNER, SO IT IS NOT PERMITTED AT ANY
 LOCATION.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-06-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-06-25 Time 09:25 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2020-06-24 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-25 09:14:06FAILED
  
 REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO
 COMMENTS.
  
 REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DRAWINGS WHICH ARE MORE
 LEGIBLE.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT
 THE SIGN LOOKS LIKE FROM THE DRAWINGS THAT ARE
 PROVIDED, SINCE TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS ARE SHOWN.
  
 A. THE STOREFRONT ELEVATION 002 DRAWING APPEARS TO HAVE
 THE TENANT NAME MOUNTED TO A PANEL THAT IS SOMEHOW
 SUSPENDED FROM THE TOP OF THE ARCADE. THE METHOD OF
 ATTACHMENT TO THE TOP OF THE ARCADE IS UNCLEAR, SO
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF IT COMPLIES WITH THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. ADDITIONALLY,
 SINCE NO PLANS DEPICTING THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
 WERE PROVIDED, STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS
 ARE MET.
  
 B. THE SIGNED ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CHANNEL LETTERS
 MOUNTED TO AN ALUMINUM TUBE. THIS DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN OPTION 2A SUSPENDED LETTERS ON A
 RACEWAY THAT IS DEPICTED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA. (NOTE: THE CITY IS PROCESSING AN
 AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT IS POSSIBLE THAT
 THIS SIGN STYLE WOULD BE PERMITTED. ZONING WILL NOT
 REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE CHANGE IS APPROVED
 AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN THAT IS BEING
 PROPOSED.)
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: ONCE ONE DESIGN IS SUBMITTED, ZONING
 COMMENTS WILL BE ISSUED FOR THAT SIGN. AS PROVIDED,
 EACH DESIGN HAS NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. EACH DESIGN HAS MULTIPLE
 ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ADDRESS OR DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. PLEASE REVIEW THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA BEFORE YOU
 RESUBMIT TO VERIFY THAT THE SIGN DESIGN YOU CHOOSE
 MEETS THE CRITERIA AND PROVIDES THE INFORMATION NEEDED
 TO REVIEW THE PERMIT.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE BLADE SIGNS TO BE SUSPENDED ON A METAL
 BRACKET, NOT FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL. (NOTE: THE CITY
 IS PROCESSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT
 IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS SIGN STYLE WOULD BE PERMITTED.
 ZONING WILL NOT REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE
 CHANGE IS APPROVED AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN
 THAT IS BEING PROPOSED.)
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: BLADE SIGNS ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO
 HAVE THE TRADE NAME AND/OR LOGO MARK ONLY. THE "SLEEP
 STORE" TEXT IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL
 PROVIDES WRITTEN APPROVAL AS A WAIVER I. THE WRITTEN
 APPROVAL MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA STATES THAT WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN PANELS
 SHALL BE DOUBLE SIDED WITH A MAXIMUM SIGN FACE OF FOUR
 (4) SQUARE FEET PER SIDE. THE PROPOSED SIGN FACE
 EXCEEDS THIS AT 29.825 INCHES ON A SIDE. NOTE: THE
 PLANS SHOW TWO DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS FOR THE SIGN
 ELEMENTS. ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE THE SAME.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE LETTERS ON A BLADE SIGN BE
 PUSH-THROUGH WHITE ACRYLIC LETTERS.
  
 A. THE MATERIALS KEY INCLUDES M-2: 1/2 INCH WHITE
 ACRYLIC PUSH THRU, HOWEVER THIS KEY NOTE IS NOT
 INCLUDED WITH THE SIGN ITSELF. IT DOES SHOW M-3 AND
 M-4, WHICH ARE WHITE ACRYLIC, BUT DO NOT SPECIFY THAT
 THESE LETTERS ARE PUSH-THROUGH. THE M-3 NOTATION ON THE
 PLAN STATES THAT THE TEXT IS ROUTED & BACKED COPY,
 WHICH IS NOT PUSH-THROUGH.
  
 B. NOTE V1 ORACLE 052 AZURE BLUE IS SHOWN POINTING TO
 THE LETTER "R". THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA ONLY PERMIT WHITE LETTERS.
  
 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT
 CITYPLACE RETAIL TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO USE ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.
 A WAIVER I MUST BE GRANTED IN WRITING BY CITYPLACE
 RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT COPY AREA BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES
 FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE
 VERIFICATION ON THE PLAN. (NOTE: THE CITY IS PROCESSING
 AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA, SO IT IS POSSIBLE
 THAT THIS COPY LAYOUT WOULD BE PERMITTED. ZONING WILL
 NOT REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL THE CODE CHANGE IS
 APPROVED AND YOU SUBMIT THE ONE SIGN DESIGN THAT IS
 BEING PROPOSED.)
  
 BANNER
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT: TEMPORARY BANNERS ARE NOT PERMITTED
 TO BE MOUNTED TO THE WALL. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE YOU ARE
 PROPOSING AN ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN, YOU ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO HAVE A FASCIA SIGN. NOTE: THE MOST RECENT
 MANAGEMENT APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED
 TEMPORARY BANNER, SO IT IS NOT PERMITTED AT ANY
 LOCATION.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-04-24 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-04-24 Time 15:39 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2020-04-22 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-24 15:39:45FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 PROVIDE DRAWIGS WHICH ARE MORE LEGIBLE.
  
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
  
 1) STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT THE SIGN LOOKS
 LIKE FROM THE DRAWINGS THAT ARE PROVIDED, SINCE TWO
 DIFFERENT DESIGNS ARE SHOWN.
  
 A. THE STOREFRONT ELEVATION 2 DRAWING APPEARS TO HAVE
 THE TENANT NAME MOUNTED TO A PANEL THAT IS SOMEHOW
 SUSPENDED FROM THE TOP OF THE ARCADE. THE METHOD OF
 ATTACHMENT TO THE TOP OF THE ARCADE IS UNCLEAR, SO
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF IT COMPLIES WITH THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. ADDITIONALLY,
 SINCE NO PLANS DEPICTING THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
 WERE PROVIDED, STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE ROSEMARY
 SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS
 ARE MET.
  
 B. THE SIGNED ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CHANNEL LETTERS
 MOUNTED TO AN ALUMINUM TUBE. THIS DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN OPTION 2A SUSPENDED LETTERS ON A
 RACEWAY THAT IS DEPICTED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA.
  
 2) ONCE ONE DESIGN IS SUBMITTED, ZONING COMMENTS WILL
 BE ISSUED FOR THAT SIGN. AS PROVIDED, EACH DESIGN HAS
 NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA. EACH DESIGN HAS MULTIPLE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT
 ADDRESS OR DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. PLEASE REVIEW THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA BEFORE YOU RESUBMIT TO VERIFY THAT
 THE SIGN DESIGN YOU CHOOSE MEETS THE CRITERIA AND
 PROVIDES THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO REVIEW THE PERMIT.
  
 BLADE SIGN
  
 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 BLADE SIGNS TO BE SUSPENDED ON A METAL BRACKET, NOT
 FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE WALL.
  
 4) BLADE SIGNS ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO HAVE THE TRADE
 NAME AND/OR LOGO MARK ONLY. THE "SLEEP STORE" TEXT IS
 NOT PERMITTED UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL PROVIDES WRITTEN
 APPROVAL AS A WAIVER I. THE WRITTEN APPROVAL MUST BE
 INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA STATES THAT
 WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN PANELS SHALL BE DOUBLE SIDED
 WITH A MAXIMUM SIGN FACE OF FOUR (4) SQUARE FEET PER
 SIDE. THE PROPOSED SIGN FACE EXCEEDS THIS AT 29.825
 INCHES ON A SIDE. NOTE: THE PLANS SHOW TWO DIFFERENT
 DIMENSIONS FOR THE SIGN ELEMENTS. ALL DIMENSIONS MUST
 BE THE SAME.
  
 6) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE LETTERS ON A BLADE SIGN BE PUSH-THROUGH WHITE
 ACRYLIC LETTERS.
  
 A. THE MATERIALS KEY INCLUDES M-2: 1/2 INCH WHITE
 ACRYLIC PUSH THRU, HOWEVER THIS KEY NOTE IS NOT
 INCLUDED WITH THE SIGN ITSELF. IT DOES SHOW M-3 AND
 M-4, WHICH ARE WHITE ACRYLIC, BUT DO NOT SPECIFY THAT
 THESE LETTERS ARE PUSH-THROUGH. THE M-3 NOTATION ON THE
 PLAN STATES THAT THE TEXT IS ROUTED & BACKED COPY,
 WHICH IS NOT PUSH-THROUGH.
  
 B. NOTE V1 ORACLE 052 AZURE BLUE IS SHOWN POINTING TO
 THE LETTER "R". THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN
 CRITERIA ONLY PERMIT WHITE LETTERS.
  
 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT
 CITYPLACE RETAIL TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO USE ALTERNATE
 MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE MASTER SIGN PLAN.
 A WAIVER I MUST BE GRANTED IN WRITING BY CITYPLACE
 RETAIL AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 8) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT COPY AREA BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF
 THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION ON THE
 PLAN.
  
 BANNER
  
 9) TEMPORARY BANNERS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE MOUNTED TO
 THE WALL. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE YOU ARE PROPOSING AN
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN, YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE A
 FASCIA SIGN.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved